Cargando…

A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media

OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the news media coverage of statins, seeking to identify specific trends or differences in viewpoint between media outlets and examine common themes. DESIGN: The study is a content analysis of the frequency and content of the reporting of statins in a selection of the B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chisnell, Julia, Marshall, Tom, Hyde, Chris, Zhelev, Zhivko, Fleming, Lora E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012613
_version_ 1783285297090396160
author Chisnell, Julia
Marshall, Tom
Hyde, Chris
Zhelev, Zhivko
Fleming, Lora E
author_facet Chisnell, Julia
Marshall, Tom
Hyde, Chris
Zhelev, Zhivko
Fleming, Lora E
author_sort Chisnell, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the news media coverage of statins, seeking to identify specific trends or differences in viewpoint between media outlets and examine common themes. DESIGN: The study is a content analysis of the frequency and content of the reporting of statins in a selection of the British newsprint media. It involved an assessment of the number, timing and thematic content of articles followed by a discourse analysis examining the underlying narratives. The sample was the output of four UK newspapers, covering a broad-spectrum readership, over a six month timeframe 1 October 2013 to 31 March 2014. RESULTS: A total of 67 articles included reference to statins. The majority (39, 58%) were reporting or responding to publication of a clinical study. The ratio of negative to positive coverage was greater than 2:1 overall. In the more politically right-leaning newspapers, 67% of coverage was predominantly negative (30/45 articles); 32% in the more left-leaning papers (7/22 articles). Common themes were the perceived ‘medicalisation’ of the population; the balance between lifestyle modification and medical treatments in the primary prevention of heart disease; side effects and effectiveness of statins; pharmaceutical sponsorship and implications for the reliability of evidence; trust between the public and government, institutions, research organisations and the medical profession. CONCLUSIONS: Newsprint media coverage of statins was substantially influenced by the publication of national guidance and by coverage in the medical journals of clinical studies and comment. Statins received a predominantly negative portrayal, notably in the more right-leaning press. There were shared themes: concern about the balance between medication and lifestyle change in the primary prevention of heart disease; the adverse effects of treatment; and a questioning of the reliability of evidence from research institutions, scientists and clinicians in the light of their potential allegiances and funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57240982017-12-19 A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media Chisnell, Julia Marshall, Tom Hyde, Chris Zhelev, Zhivko Fleming, Lora E BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the news media coverage of statins, seeking to identify specific trends or differences in viewpoint between media outlets and examine common themes. DESIGN: The study is a content analysis of the frequency and content of the reporting of statins in a selection of the British newsprint media. It involved an assessment of the number, timing and thematic content of articles followed by a discourse analysis examining the underlying narratives. The sample was the output of four UK newspapers, covering a broad-spectrum readership, over a six month timeframe 1 October 2013 to 31 March 2014. RESULTS: A total of 67 articles included reference to statins. The majority (39, 58%) were reporting or responding to publication of a clinical study. The ratio of negative to positive coverage was greater than 2:1 overall. In the more politically right-leaning newspapers, 67% of coverage was predominantly negative (30/45 articles); 32% in the more left-leaning papers (7/22 articles). Common themes were the perceived ‘medicalisation’ of the population; the balance between lifestyle modification and medical treatments in the primary prevention of heart disease; side effects and effectiveness of statins; pharmaceutical sponsorship and implications for the reliability of evidence; trust between the public and government, institutions, research organisations and the medical profession. CONCLUSIONS: Newsprint media coverage of statins was substantially influenced by the publication of national guidance and by coverage in the medical journals of clinical studies and comment. Statins received a predominantly negative portrayal, notably in the more right-leaning press. There were shared themes: concern about the balance between medication and lifestyle change in the primary prevention of heart disease; the adverse effects of treatment; and a questioning of the reliability of evidence from research institutions, scientists and clinicians in the light of their potential allegiances and funding. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5724098/ /pubmed/28827228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012613 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Chisnell, Julia
Marshall, Tom
Hyde, Chris
Zhelev, Zhivko
Fleming, Lora E
A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title_full A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title_fullStr A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title_full_unstemmed A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title_short A content analysis of the representation of statins in the British newsprint media
title_sort content analysis of the representation of statins in the british newsprint media
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012613
work_keys_str_mv AT chisnelljulia acontentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT marshalltom acontentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT hydechris acontentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT zhelevzhivko acontentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT fleminglorae acontentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT chisnelljulia contentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT marshalltom contentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT hydechris contentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT zhelevzhivko contentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia
AT fleminglorae contentanalysisoftherepresentationofstatinsinthebritishnewsprintmedia