Cargando…

Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Core outcome sets are standardised lists of outcomes, which should be measured and reported in all clinical studies of a specific condition. This study aims to develop core outcome sets for economic evaluations in asthma studies. Economic outcomes include items such as costs, resource...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hounsome, Natalia, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Phillips, Ceri, Patel, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017054
_version_ 1783285308539797504
author Hounsome, Natalia
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Phillips, Ceri
Patel, Anita
author_facet Hounsome, Natalia
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Phillips, Ceri
Patel, Anita
author_sort Hounsome, Natalia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Core outcome sets are standardised lists of outcomes, which should be measured and reported in all clinical studies of a specific condition. This study aims to develop core outcome sets for economic evaluations in asthma studies. Economic outcomes include items such as costs, resource use or quality-adjusted life years. The starting point in developing core outcome sets will be conducting a systematic literature review to establish a preliminary list of reporting items to be considered for inclusion in the core outcome set. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct literature searches of peer-reviewed studies published from January 1990 to January 2017. These will include any comparative or observational studies (including economic models) and systematic reviews reporting economic outcomes. All identified economic outcomes will be tabulated together with the major study characteristics, such as population, study design, the nature and intensity of the intervention, mode of data collection and instrument(s) used to derive an outcome. We will undertake a ‘realist synthesis review’ to analyse the identified economic outcomes. The outcomes will be summarised in the context of evaluation perspectives, types of economic evaluation and methodological approaches. Parallel to undertaking a systematic review, we will conduct semistructured interviews with stakeholders (including people with personal experience of asthma, health professionals, researchers and decision makers) in order to explore additional outcomes which have not been considered, or used, in published studies. The list of outcomes generated from the systematic review and interviews with stakeholders will form the basis of a Delphi survey to refine the identified outcomes into a core outcome set. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The review will not involve access to individual-level data. Findings from our systematic review will be communicated to a broad range of stakeholders including clinical guideline developers, research funders, trial registries, ethics committees and other regulators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57241452017-12-19 Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review Hounsome, Natalia Fitzsimmons, Deborah Phillips, Ceri Patel, Anita BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Core outcome sets are standardised lists of outcomes, which should be measured and reported in all clinical studies of a specific condition. This study aims to develop core outcome sets for economic evaluations in asthma studies. Economic outcomes include items such as costs, resource use or quality-adjusted life years. The starting point in developing core outcome sets will be conducting a systematic literature review to establish a preliminary list of reporting items to be considered for inclusion in the core outcome set. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct literature searches of peer-reviewed studies published from January 1990 to January 2017. These will include any comparative or observational studies (including economic models) and systematic reviews reporting economic outcomes. All identified economic outcomes will be tabulated together with the major study characteristics, such as population, study design, the nature and intensity of the intervention, mode of data collection and instrument(s) used to derive an outcome. We will undertake a ‘realist synthesis review’ to analyse the identified economic outcomes. The outcomes will be summarised in the context of evaluation perspectives, types of economic evaluation and methodological approaches. Parallel to undertaking a systematic review, we will conduct semistructured interviews with stakeholders (including people with personal experience of asthma, health professionals, researchers and decision makers) in order to explore additional outcomes which have not been considered, or used, in published studies. The list of outcomes generated from the systematic review and interviews with stakeholders will form the basis of a Delphi survey to refine the identified outcomes into a core outcome set. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The review will not involve access to individual-level data. Findings from our systematic review will be communicated to a broad range of stakeholders including clinical guideline developers, research funders, trial registries, ethics committees and other regulators. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5724145/ /pubmed/28801433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017054 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Hounsome, Natalia
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Phillips, Ceri
Patel, Anita
Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title_short Developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
title_sort developing core economic outcome sets for asthma studies: a protocol for a systematic review
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017054
work_keys_str_mv AT hounsomenatalia developingcoreeconomicoutcomesetsforasthmastudiesaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT fitzsimmonsdeborah developingcoreeconomicoutcomesetsforasthmastudiesaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT phillipsceri developingcoreeconomicoutcomesetsforasthmastudiesaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT patelanita developingcoreeconomicoutcomesetsforasthmastudiesaprotocolforasystematicreview