Cargando…
Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289 |
_version_ | 1783285312140607488 |
---|---|
author | O’Donnell, Catherine A Mair, Frances S Dowrick, Christopher Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de de Brún, Tomas Burns, Nicola Lionis, Christos Saridaki, Aristoula Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Maria van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn Gravenhorst, Katja Cooper, Lucy Princz, Christine Teunissen, Erik Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen Vlahadi, Maria Spiegel, Wolfgang MacFarlane, Anne |
author_facet | O’Donnell, Catherine A Mair, Frances S Dowrick, Christopher Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de de Brún, Tomas Burns, Nicola Lionis, Christos Saridaki, Aristoula Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Maria van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn Gravenhorst, Katja Cooper, Lucy Princz, Christine Teunissen, Erik Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen Vlahadi, Maria Spiegel, Wolfgang MacFarlane, Anne |
author_sort | O’Donnell, Catherine A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. SETTING: Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. RESULTS: Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. CONCLUSION: A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5724160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57241602017-12-19 Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example O’Donnell, Catherine A Mair, Frances S Dowrick, Christopher Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de de Brún, Tomas Burns, Nicola Lionis, Christos Saridaki, Aristoula Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Maria van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn Gravenhorst, Katja Cooper, Lucy Princz, Christine Teunissen, Erik Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen Vlahadi, Maria Spiegel, Wolfgang MacFarlane, Anne BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. SETTING: Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. RESULTS: Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. CONCLUSION: A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies. BMJ Open 2017-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5724160/ /pubmed/28827231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research O’Donnell, Catherine A Mair, Frances S Dowrick, Christopher Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de de Brún, Tomas Burns, Nicola Lionis, Christos Saridaki, Aristoula Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Maria van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn Gravenhorst, Katja Cooper, Lucy Princz, Christine Teunissen, Erik Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen Vlahadi, Maria Spiegel, Wolfgang MacFarlane, Anne Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title | Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title_full | Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title_fullStr | Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title_full_unstemmed | Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title_short | Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example |
title_sort | supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using normalisation process theory as an example |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odonnellcatherinea supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT mairfrancess supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT dowrickchristopher supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT brunmaryoreillyde supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT debruntomas supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT burnsnicola supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT lionischristos supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT saridakiaristoula supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT papadakakimaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT vandenmuijsenberghmaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT vanweelbaumgartenevelyn supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT gravenhorstkatja supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT cooperlucy supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT princzchristine supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT teunissenerik supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT mareeuwfrancinevandendriessen supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT vlahadimaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT spiegelwolfgang supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample AT macfarlaneanne supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample |