Cargando…

Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example

OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, Catherine A, Mair, Frances S, Dowrick, Christopher, Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de, de Brún, Tomas, Burns, Nicola, Lionis, Christos, Saridaki, Aristoula, Papadakaki, Maria, van den Muijsenbergh, Maria, van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn, Gravenhorst, Katja, Cooper, Lucy, Princz, Christine, Teunissen, Erik, Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen, Vlahadi, Maria, Spiegel, Wolfgang, MacFarlane, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289
_version_ 1783285312140607488
author O’Donnell, Catherine A
Mair, Frances S
Dowrick, Christopher
Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de
de Brún, Tomas
Burns, Nicola
Lionis, Christos
Saridaki, Aristoula
Papadakaki, Maria
van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
Gravenhorst, Katja
Cooper, Lucy
Princz, Christine
Teunissen, Erik
Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen
Vlahadi, Maria
Spiegel, Wolfgang
MacFarlane, Anne
author_facet O’Donnell, Catherine A
Mair, Frances S
Dowrick, Christopher
Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de
de Brún, Tomas
Burns, Nicola
Lionis, Christos
Saridaki, Aristoula
Papadakaki, Maria
van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
Gravenhorst, Katja
Cooper, Lucy
Princz, Christine
Teunissen, Erik
Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen
Vlahadi, Maria
Spiegel, Wolfgang
MacFarlane, Anne
author_sort O’Donnell, Catherine A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. SETTING: Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. RESULTS: Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. CONCLUSION: A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57241602017-12-19 Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example O’Donnell, Catherine A Mair, Frances S Dowrick, Christopher Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de de Brún, Tomas Burns, Nicola Lionis, Christos Saridaki, Aristoula Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Maria van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn Gravenhorst, Katja Cooper, Lucy Princz, Christine Teunissen, Erik Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen Vlahadi, Maria Spiegel, Wolfgang MacFarlane, Anne BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN: Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. SETTING: Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. RESULTS: Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. CONCLUSION: A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies. BMJ Open 2017-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5724160/ /pubmed/28827231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
O’Donnell, Catherine A
Mair, Frances S
Dowrick, Christopher
Brún, Mary O’Reilly-de
de Brún, Tomas
Burns, Nicola
Lionis, Christos
Saridaki, Aristoula
Papadakaki, Maria
van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
Gravenhorst, Katja
Cooper, Lucy
Princz, Christine
Teunissen, Erik
Mareeuw, Francine van den Driessen
Vlahadi, Maria
Spiegel, Wolfgang
MacFarlane, Anne
Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title_full Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title_fullStr Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title_full_unstemmed Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title_short Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
title_sort supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using normalisation process theory as an example
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnellcatherinea supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT mairfrancess supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT dowrickchristopher supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT brunmaryoreillyde supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT debruntomas supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT burnsnicola supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT lionischristos supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT saridakiaristoula supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT papadakakimaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT vandenmuijsenberghmaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT vanweelbaumgartenevelyn supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT gravenhorstkatja supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT cooperlucy supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT princzchristine supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT teunissenerik supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT mareeuwfrancinevandendriessen supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT vlahadimaria supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT spiegelwolfgang supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample
AT macfarlaneanne supportingtheuseoftheoryincrosscountryhealthservicesresearchaparticipatoryqualitativeapproachusingnormalisationprocesstheoryasanexample