Cargando…

The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oczkowski, Simon J W, Ball, Ian, Saleh, Carol, Kalles, Gaelen, Chkaroubo, Anatoli, Kekewich, Mike, Miller, Paul, Dees, Marianne, Frolic, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888
_version_ 1783285320563818496
author Oczkowski, Simon J W
Ball, Ian
Saleh, Carol
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
author_facet Oczkowski, Simon J W
Ball, Ian
Saleh, Carol
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
author_sort Oczkowski, Simon J W
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of providing an assisted death. Therefore, we propose a scoping review to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of MAID, in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and professional guidelines and recommendations from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to June 2017. Eligible report types will include technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies. We will include all descriptions of MAID provision (either euthanasia or assisted suicide) in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID, for any reason, including reports where patients have provided consent to MAID in advance of the development of incapacity (eg, dementia). We will exclude reports in which patients receive involuntary euthanasia (eg, capital punishment). Two independent investigators will screen and select retrieved reports using pilot-tested screening and eligibility forms, and collect data using standardised data collection forms. We will summarise extracted data in tabular format with accompanying descriptive statistics and use narrative format to describe their clinical relevance, identify knowledge gaps and suggest topics for future research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will map the range and scope of the existing literature on the provision of MAID in jurisdictions where the practice has been decriminalised. The review will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. These results will be useful to clinicians, policy makers and researchers involved with MAID.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57242082017-12-19 The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review Oczkowski, Simon J W Ball, Ian Saleh, Carol Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of providing an assisted death. Therefore, we propose a scoping review to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of MAID, in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and professional guidelines and recommendations from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to June 2017. Eligible report types will include technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies. We will include all descriptions of MAID provision (either euthanasia or assisted suicide) in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID, for any reason, including reports where patients have provided consent to MAID in advance of the development of incapacity (eg, dementia). We will exclude reports in which patients receive involuntary euthanasia (eg, capital punishment). Two independent investigators will screen and select retrieved reports using pilot-tested screening and eligibility forms, and collect data using standardised data collection forms. We will summarise extracted data in tabular format with accompanying descriptive statistics and use narrative format to describe their clinical relevance, identify knowledge gaps and suggest topics for future research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will map the range and scope of the existing literature on the provision of MAID in jurisdictions where the practice has been decriminalised. The review will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. These results will be useful to clinicians, policy makers and researchers involved with MAID. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5724208/ /pubmed/28801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Oczkowski, Simon J W
Ball, Ian
Saleh, Carol
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title_full The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title_short The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888
work_keys_str_mv AT oczkowskisimonjw theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT ballian theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT salehcarol theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT kallesgaelen theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT chkarouboanatoli theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT kekewichmike theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT millerpaul theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT deesmarianne theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT frolicandrea theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT oczkowskisimonjw provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT ballian provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT salehcarol provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT kallesgaelen provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT chkarouboanatoli provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT kekewichmike provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT millerpaul provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT deesmarianne provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview
AT frolicandrea provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview