Cargando…
The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888 |
_version_ | 1783285320563818496 |
---|---|
author | Oczkowski, Simon J W Ball, Ian Saleh, Carol Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea |
author_facet | Oczkowski, Simon J W Ball, Ian Saleh, Carol Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea |
author_sort | Oczkowski, Simon J W |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of providing an assisted death. Therefore, we propose a scoping review to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of MAID, in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and professional guidelines and recommendations from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to June 2017. Eligible report types will include technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies. We will include all descriptions of MAID provision (either euthanasia or assisted suicide) in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID, for any reason, including reports where patients have provided consent to MAID in advance of the development of incapacity (eg, dementia). We will exclude reports in which patients receive involuntary euthanasia (eg, capital punishment). Two independent investigators will screen and select retrieved reports using pilot-tested screening and eligibility forms, and collect data using standardised data collection forms. We will summarise extracted data in tabular format with accompanying descriptive statistics and use narrative format to describe their clinical relevance, identify knowledge gaps and suggest topics for future research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will map the range and scope of the existing literature on the provision of MAID in jurisdictions where the practice has been decriminalised. The review will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. These results will be useful to clinicians, policy makers and researchers involved with MAID. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5724208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57242082017-12-19 The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review Oczkowski, Simon J W Ball, Ian Saleh, Carol Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Medical assistance in dying (MAID), a term encompassing both euthanasia and assisted suicide, was decriminalised in Canada in 2015. Although Bill C-14 legislated eligibility criteria under which patients could receive MAID, it did not provide guidance regarding the technical aspects of providing an assisted death. Therefore, we propose a scoping review to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of MAID, in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and professional guidelines and recommendations from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to June 2017. Eligible report types will include technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies. We will include all descriptions of MAID provision (either euthanasia or assisted suicide) in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID, for any reason, including reports where patients have provided consent to MAID in advance of the development of incapacity (eg, dementia). We will exclude reports in which patients receive involuntary euthanasia (eg, capital punishment). Two independent investigators will screen and select retrieved reports using pilot-tested screening and eligibility forms, and collect data using standardised data collection forms. We will summarise extracted data in tabular format with accompanying descriptive statistics and use narrative format to describe their clinical relevance, identify knowledge gaps and suggest topics for future research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will map the range and scope of the existing literature on the provision of MAID in jurisdictions where the practice has been decriminalised. The review will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. These results will be useful to clinicians, policy makers and researchers involved with MAID. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5724208/ /pubmed/28801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Palliative Care Oczkowski, Simon J W Ball, Ian Saleh, Carol Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title | The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full | The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title_short | The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
title_sort | provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review |
topic | Palliative Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oczkowskisimonjw theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT ballian theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT salehcarol theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT kallesgaelen theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT chkarouboanatoli theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT kekewichmike theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT millerpaul theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT deesmarianne theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT frolicandrea theprovisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT oczkowskisimonjw provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT ballian provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT salehcarol provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT kallesgaelen provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT chkarouboanatoli provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT kekewichmike provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT millerpaul provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT deesmarianne provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview AT frolicandrea provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingprotocolforascopingreview |