Cargando…

Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures

The purpose of this work is to estimate the uncertainty in the manual contouring of normal anatomical structures. The heart, esophagus, and spinal cord were contoured manually on six sets of computed tomography images by six dosimetrists whose experience ranged from 1 year to over 15 years. To deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collier, Dawn C., Burnett, Stuart S. C., Amin, Mayankkumar, Bilton, Stephen, Brooks, Christopher, Ryan, Amanda, Roniger, Dominique, Tran, Danny, Starkschall, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12540815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i1.2538
_version_ 1783285356780584960
author Collier, Dawn C.
Burnett, Stuart S. C.
Amin, Mayankkumar
Bilton, Stephen
Brooks, Christopher
Ryan, Amanda
Roniger, Dominique
Tran, Danny
Starkschall, George
author_facet Collier, Dawn C.
Burnett, Stuart S. C.
Amin, Mayankkumar
Bilton, Stephen
Brooks, Christopher
Ryan, Amanda
Roniger, Dominique
Tran, Danny
Starkschall, George
author_sort Collier, Dawn C.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this work is to estimate the uncertainty in the manual contouring of normal anatomical structures. The heart, esophagus, and spinal cord were contoured manually on six sets of computed tomography images by six dosimetrists whose experience ranged from 1 year to over 15 years. To determine the differences between inter‐ and intraobserver variations, each data set was contoured by one of the dosimetrists five times and once each by the five other dosimetrists. The magnitude of the discrepancies in delineating the contours was assessed. Intradosimetrist contouring discrepancies were as follows: esophagus, average 0.3 cm and maximum 2.9 cm; heart, average 0.5 cm and maximum 7.6 cm; and spinal cord, average 0.1 cm and maximum 0.7 cm. Interdosimetrist contouring discrepancies were as follows: esophagus, average 0.4 cm and maximum 3.1 cm; heart, average 0.7 cm and maximum 8.1 cm; and spinal cord, average 0.2 cm and maximum 0.9 cm. Significant discrepancies can occur when normal anatomic structures are contoured manually. Interdosimetrist discrepancies are typically slightly greater than intradosimetrist discrepancies. The magnitude of the discrepancies does not appear to be correlated to the experience of the dosimetrist. © 2003 American College of Medical Physics. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.66.–a
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57244292018-04-02 Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures Collier, Dawn C. Burnett, Stuart S. C. Amin, Mayankkumar Bilton, Stephen Brooks, Christopher Ryan, Amanda Roniger, Dominique Tran, Danny Starkschall, George J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to estimate the uncertainty in the manual contouring of normal anatomical structures. The heart, esophagus, and spinal cord were contoured manually on six sets of computed tomography images by six dosimetrists whose experience ranged from 1 year to over 15 years. To determine the differences between inter‐ and intraobserver variations, each data set was contoured by one of the dosimetrists five times and once each by the five other dosimetrists. The magnitude of the discrepancies in delineating the contours was assessed. Intradosimetrist contouring discrepancies were as follows: esophagus, average 0.3 cm and maximum 2.9 cm; heart, average 0.5 cm and maximum 7.6 cm; and spinal cord, average 0.1 cm and maximum 0.7 cm. Interdosimetrist contouring discrepancies were as follows: esophagus, average 0.4 cm and maximum 3.1 cm; heart, average 0.7 cm and maximum 8.1 cm; and spinal cord, average 0.2 cm and maximum 0.9 cm. Significant discrepancies can occur when normal anatomic structures are contoured manually. Interdosimetrist discrepancies are typically slightly greater than intradosimetrist discrepancies. The magnitude of the discrepancies does not appear to be correlated to the experience of the dosimetrist. © 2003 American College of Medical Physics. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.66.–a John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724429/ /pubmed/12540815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i1.2538 Text en © 2003 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Collier, Dawn C.
Burnett, Stuart S. C.
Amin, Mayankkumar
Bilton, Stephen
Brooks, Christopher
Ryan, Amanda
Roniger, Dominique
Tran, Danny
Starkschall, George
Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title_full Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title_fullStr Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title_short Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
title_sort assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12540815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i1.2538
work_keys_str_mv AT collierdawnc assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT burnettstuartsc assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT aminmayankkumar assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT biltonstephen assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT brookschristopher assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT ryanamanda assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT ronigerdominique assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT trandanny assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures
AT starkschallgeorge assessmentofconsistencyincontouringofnormaltissueanatomicstructures