Cargando…

Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence

A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prisciandaro, J. I., Herman, M. G., Kruse, J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502
_version_ 1783285364612399104
author Prisciandaro, J. I.
Herman, M. G.
Kruse, J. J.
author_facet Prisciandaro, J. I.
Herman, M. G.
Kruse, J. J.
author_sort Prisciandaro, J. I.
collection PubMed
description A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block tray in which Sn/Pb wires, 1 mm in diameter, were embedded into a diamond shaped groove milled into the tray. The collimator jaws of the linac were aligned such that the light field fell directly on the corners of the diamond. A radiation detection algorithm within the EPI software determined the extent of the radiation field. The light and radiation field congruence was evaluated by comparing the vertexes of the diamond reference structure to the detected radiation field. In addition, the digital jaw settings were recorded and later compared to the light field detected on the films and EPIs. Three linear accelerators were tracked for a period ranging from 2–8 months. Light radiation field congruence tests with films and EPIs were comparable, yielding a difference of less than 0.6 mm, well within the allowed 2‐mm tolerance. A disparity was observed in the magnitude of the detected light field. The X and Y dimensions of the light field measured with film differed by less than or equal to 1.4 mm from the digital collimator settings, whereas the values extracted from the EPIs differed by up to 2.5 mm. Based on these findings, EPIs were found to be a quick and reliable alternative to film for qualitative and relative analyses. PACS number(s): 87.53.Xd, 87.56.Fc, 87.53.Oq, 87.52.–g, 87.53.–j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57244612018-04-02 Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence Prisciandaro, J. I. Herman, M. G. Kruse, J. J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block tray in which Sn/Pb wires, 1 mm in diameter, were embedded into a diamond shaped groove milled into the tray. The collimator jaws of the linac were aligned such that the light field fell directly on the corners of the diamond. A radiation detection algorithm within the EPI software determined the extent of the radiation field. The light and radiation field congruence was evaluated by comparing the vertexes of the diamond reference structure to the detected radiation field. In addition, the digital jaw settings were recorded and later compared to the light field detected on the films and EPIs. Three linear accelerators were tracked for a period ranging from 2–8 months. Light radiation field congruence tests with films and EPIs were comparable, yielding a difference of less than 0.6 mm, well within the allowed 2‐mm tolerance. A disparity was observed in the magnitude of the detected light field. The X and Y dimensions of the light field measured with film differed by less than or equal to 1.4 mm from the digital collimator settings, whereas the values extracted from the EPIs differed by up to 2.5 mm. Based on these findings, EPIs were found to be a quick and reliable alternative to film for qualitative and relative analyses. PACS number(s): 87.53.Xd, 87.56.Fc, 87.53.Oq, 87.52.–g, 87.53.–j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724461/ /pubmed/14604421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502 Text en © 2003 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Prisciandaro, J. I.
Herman, M. G.
Kruse, J. J.
Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title_full Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title_fullStr Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title_short Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
title_sort utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502
work_keys_str_mv AT prisciandaroji utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence
AT hermanmg utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence
AT krusejj utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence