Cargando…
Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence
A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502 |
_version_ | 1783285364612399104 |
---|---|
author | Prisciandaro, J. I. Herman, M. G. Kruse, J. J. |
author_facet | Prisciandaro, J. I. Herman, M. G. Kruse, J. J. |
author_sort | Prisciandaro, J. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block tray in which Sn/Pb wires, 1 mm in diameter, were embedded into a diamond shaped groove milled into the tray. The collimator jaws of the linac were aligned such that the light field fell directly on the corners of the diamond. A radiation detection algorithm within the EPI software determined the extent of the radiation field. The light and radiation field congruence was evaluated by comparing the vertexes of the diamond reference structure to the detected radiation field. In addition, the digital jaw settings were recorded and later compared to the light field detected on the films and EPIs. Three linear accelerators were tracked for a period ranging from 2–8 months. Light radiation field congruence tests with films and EPIs were comparable, yielding a difference of less than 0.6 mm, well within the allowed 2‐mm tolerance. A disparity was observed in the magnitude of the detected light field. The X and Y dimensions of the light field measured with film differed by less than or equal to 1.4 mm from the digital collimator settings, whereas the values extracted from the EPIs differed by up to 2.5 mm. Based on these findings, EPIs were found to be a quick and reliable alternative to film for qualitative and relative analyses. PACS number(s): 87.53.Xd, 87.56.Fc, 87.53.Oq, 87.52.–g, 87.53.–j |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5724461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57244612018-04-02 Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence Prisciandaro, J. I. Herman, M. G. Kruse, J. J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A method to investigate light and radiation field congruence utilizing a commercially available amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed. This method employed an EPID, the associated EPI software, and a diamond‐shaped template. The template was constructed from a block tray in which Sn/Pb wires, 1 mm in diameter, were embedded into a diamond shaped groove milled into the tray. The collimator jaws of the linac were aligned such that the light field fell directly on the corners of the diamond. A radiation detection algorithm within the EPI software determined the extent of the radiation field. The light and radiation field congruence was evaluated by comparing the vertexes of the diamond reference structure to the detected radiation field. In addition, the digital jaw settings were recorded and later compared to the light field detected on the films and EPIs. Three linear accelerators were tracked for a period ranging from 2–8 months. Light radiation field congruence tests with films and EPIs were comparable, yielding a difference of less than 0.6 mm, well within the allowed 2‐mm tolerance. A disparity was observed in the magnitude of the detected light field. The X and Y dimensions of the light field measured with film differed by less than or equal to 1.4 mm from the digital collimator settings, whereas the values extracted from the EPIs differed by up to 2.5 mm. Based on these findings, EPIs were found to be a quick and reliable alternative to film for qualitative and relative analyses. PACS number(s): 87.53.Xd, 87.56.Fc, 87.53.Oq, 87.52.–g, 87.53.–j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724461/ /pubmed/14604421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502 Text en © 2003 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Prisciandaro, J. I. Herman, M. G. Kruse, J. J. Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title | Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title_full | Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title_fullStr | Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title_short | Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
title_sort | utilizing an electronic portal imaging device to monitor light and radiation field congruence |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prisciandaroji utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence AT hermanmg utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence AT krusejj utilizinganelectronicportalimagingdevicetomonitorlightandradiationfieldcongruence |