Cargando…

CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer

Objective: To assess the impact of CT slice index and thickness (3 mm versus 5 mm) on (i) prostate volume, dimensions, and isocenter coordinates, (ii) bladder and rectal volumes, and (iii) DRR quality, in the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods: 16 patients with prostate cancer underwent two plann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berthelet, E., Liu, M., Truong, P., Czaykowski, P., Kalach, N., Yu, C., Patterson, K., Currie, T., Kristensen, S., Kwan, W., Moravan, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2511
_version_ 1783285364848328704
author Berthelet, E.
Liu, M.
Truong, P.
Czaykowski, P.
Kalach, N.
Yu, C.
Patterson, K.
Currie, T.
Kristensen, S.
Kwan, W.
Moravan, V.
author_facet Berthelet, E.
Liu, M.
Truong, P.
Czaykowski, P.
Kalach, N.
Yu, C.
Patterson, K.
Currie, T.
Kristensen, S.
Kwan, W.
Moravan, V.
author_sort Berthelet, E.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To assess the impact of CT slice index and thickness (3 mm versus 5 mm) on (i) prostate volume, dimensions, and isocenter coordinates, (ii) bladder and rectal volumes, and (iii) DRR quality, in the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods: 16 patients with prostate cancer underwent two planning CT‐scans using 3 and 5 mm slice index/thickness. Prostate, bladder, and rectum were outlined on all scans. Prostate isocenter coordinates, maximum dimensions, and volumes were compared along with bladder and rectal volumes. Bladder volumes and maximum diameters were further investigated using a second observer. A comparative analysis of DRR quality was conducted as well as a dosimetric analysis using DVH. Results: The differences in measurements of prostate volume, isocenter coordinates and maximum dimensions between the 3 and 5 mm scans, were small and not statistically significant. Similar finding was seen for rectal volume. However, bladder volume was always larger on the 3 mm scan [Formula: see text] and the findings were reproduced with the second observer [Formula: see text]. The differences in volume are caused by a slight increase in (1) the measurement of the longitudinal dimensions on the 3 mm scans, and (2) the slice by slice measured bladder area on the 3 mm scans. The latter is due to partial volume effect. The 3 mm DRR were slightly better than the 5 mm DRR. The bladder DVH differed significantly in some patients. Conclusion: Bladder volume is significantly larger on the 3 mm scans. Differences in contoured areas may be accounted for, in part, by the partial volume effect. PACS number(s): 87.57.–s, 87.53.–j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57244622018-04-02 CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer Berthelet, E. Liu, M. Truong, P. Czaykowski, P. Kalach, N. Yu, C. Patterson, K. Currie, T. Kristensen, S. Kwan, W. Moravan, V. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Objective: To assess the impact of CT slice index and thickness (3 mm versus 5 mm) on (i) prostate volume, dimensions, and isocenter coordinates, (ii) bladder and rectal volumes, and (iii) DRR quality, in the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods: 16 patients with prostate cancer underwent two planning CT‐scans using 3 and 5 mm slice index/thickness. Prostate, bladder, and rectum were outlined on all scans. Prostate isocenter coordinates, maximum dimensions, and volumes were compared along with bladder and rectal volumes. Bladder volumes and maximum diameters were further investigated using a second observer. A comparative analysis of DRR quality was conducted as well as a dosimetric analysis using DVH. Results: The differences in measurements of prostate volume, isocenter coordinates and maximum dimensions between the 3 and 5 mm scans, were small and not statistically significant. Similar finding was seen for rectal volume. However, bladder volume was always larger on the 3 mm scan [Formula: see text] and the findings were reproduced with the second observer [Formula: see text]. The differences in volume are caused by a slight increase in (1) the measurement of the longitudinal dimensions on the 3 mm scans, and (2) the slice by slice measured bladder area on the 3 mm scans. The latter is due to partial volume effect. The 3 mm DRR were slightly better than the 5 mm DRR. The bladder DVH differed significantly in some patients. Conclusion: Bladder volume is significantly larger on the 3 mm scans. Differences in contoured areas may be accounted for, in part, by the partial volume effect. PACS number(s): 87.57.–s, 87.53.–j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724462/ /pubmed/14604426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2511 Text en © 2003 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Berthelet, E.
Liu, M.
Truong, P.
Czaykowski, P.
Kalach, N.
Yu, C.
Patterson, K.
Currie, T.
Kristensen, S.
Kwan, W.
Moravan, V.
CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title_full CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title_fullStr CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title_short CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
title_sort ct slice index and thickness: impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2511
work_keys_str_mv AT berthelete ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT lium ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT truongp ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT czaykowskip ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT kalachn ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT yuc ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT pattersonk ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT curriet ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT kristensens ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT kwanw ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer
AT moravanv ctsliceindexandthicknessimpactonorgancontouringinradiationtreatmentplanningforprostatecancer