Cargando…
Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have concluded that medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) performed by non‐doctor providers may be as effective and safe as when provided by doctors. Medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage by non‐doctor providers and the treated women's acceptance o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28445596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14712 |
_version_ | 1783285370577747968 |
---|---|
author | Sjöström, S Dragoman, M Fønhus, MS Ganatra, B Gemzell‐Danielsson, K |
author_facet | Sjöström, S Dragoman, M Fønhus, MS Ganatra, B Gemzell‐Danielsson, K |
author_sort | Sjöström, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have concluded that medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) performed by non‐doctor providers may be as effective and safe as when provided by doctors. Medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage by non‐doctor providers and the treated women's acceptance of non‐doctor providers of TOP has not previously been reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical TOP, including medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage, by trained non‐doctor providers. SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA: A search strategy using appropriate medical subject headings was developed. Electronic databases (PubMed, Popline, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception through April 2016. Randomised controlled trials and comparative observational studies were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta‐analyses were performed for included randomised controlled trials regarding the outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability to women. Certainty of evidence was established using the GRADE approach assessing study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: Six papers were included. Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage is probably equally effective when performed by non‐doctor providers as when performed by doctors (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99–1.01). Women's acceptance, reported as overall satisfaction with the allocated provider, is probably equally high between groups (RR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00–1.01). CONCLUSION: Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage provided by trained non‐doctor providers is probably equally as effective and acceptable to women as when provided by doctors. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Medical termination of pregnancy performed by doctors and non‐doctors can be equally effective and acceptable |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5724486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57244862017-12-12 Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review Sjöström, S Dragoman, M Fønhus, MS Ganatra, B Gemzell‐Danielsson, K BJOG Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have concluded that medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) performed by non‐doctor providers may be as effective and safe as when provided by doctors. Medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage by non‐doctor providers and the treated women's acceptance of non‐doctor providers of TOP has not previously been reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical TOP, including medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage, by trained non‐doctor providers. SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA: A search strategy using appropriate medical subject headings was developed. Electronic databases (PubMed, Popline, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception through April 2016. Randomised controlled trials and comparative observational studies were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta‐analyses were performed for included randomised controlled trials regarding the outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability to women. Certainty of evidence was established using the GRADE approach assessing study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: Six papers were included. Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage is probably equally effective when performed by non‐doctor providers as when performed by doctors (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99–1.01). Women's acceptance, reported as overall satisfaction with the allocated provider, is probably equally high between groups (RR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00–1.01). CONCLUSION: Medical TOP and medical treatment of incomplete miscarriage provided by trained non‐doctor providers is probably equally as effective and acceptable to women as when provided by doctors. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Medical termination of pregnancy performed by doctors and non‐doctors can be equally effective and acceptable John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-17 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5724486/ /pubmed/28445596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14712 Text en © 2017 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Sjöström, S Dragoman, M Fønhus, MS Ganatra, B Gemzell‐Danielsson, K Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title | Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title_full | Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title_short | Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28445596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sjostroms effectivenesssafetyandacceptabilityoffirsttrimestermedicalterminationofpregnancyperformedbynondoctorprovidersasystematicreview AT dragomanm effectivenesssafetyandacceptabilityoffirsttrimestermedicalterminationofpregnancyperformedbynondoctorprovidersasystematicreview AT fønhusms effectivenesssafetyandacceptabilityoffirsttrimestermedicalterminationofpregnancyperformedbynondoctorprovidersasystematicreview AT ganatrab effectivenesssafetyandacceptabilityoffirsttrimestermedicalterminationofpregnancyperformedbynondoctorprovidersasystematicreview AT gemzelldanielssonk effectivenesssafetyandacceptabilityoffirsttrimestermedicalterminationofpregnancyperformedbynondoctorprovidersasystematicreview |