Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550 |
_version_ | 1783285378553217024 |
---|---|
author | Bice, W. S. Walker, E. S. Gearty, S. Walker, A. V. Marbach, J. R. Prestidge, B. R. |
author_facet | Bice, W. S. Walker, E. S. Gearty, S. Walker, A. V. Marbach, J. R. Prestidge, B. R. |
author_sort | Bice, W. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well as to investigate any improvement in the time or exposure burden due to the introduction of a new loading device. The movements and radiation exposures for two single, highly experienced dosimetrists were monitored for ten conventionally loaded iodine implant cases. These same cases were reloaded with dummy sources using the sleeved system to determine time savings, if any. Two of these ten cases were then loaded with live sources using the sleeved system to determine relative exposure to the loading staff between the two methods. The results were then analyzed to generate per‐seed and per‐needle loading time and exposure burdens. Formulas are presented that may be used to determine the average time to load implants and the resultant staff exposure, both with the conventional technique and with the sleeved method. On the average, it takes an experienced loader 48 min to prepare an implant for the operating room, receiving a hand dose of about 10 mrem and a whole body dose of about 1 mrem. The sleeved system reduced these values by at least half. The time and exposure burden associated with the preparation of iodine loose seed implants has been characterized. The use of the sleeved needles resulted in significant time and exposure reductions for the medical staff. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Xd |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5724534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57245342018-04-02 A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy Bice, W. S. Walker, E. S. Gearty, S. Walker, A. V. Marbach, J. R. Prestidge, B. R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well as to investigate any improvement in the time or exposure burden due to the introduction of a new loading device. The movements and radiation exposures for two single, highly experienced dosimetrists were monitored for ten conventionally loaded iodine implant cases. These same cases were reloaded with dummy sources using the sleeved system to determine time savings, if any. Two of these ten cases were then loaded with live sources using the sleeved system to determine relative exposure to the loading staff between the two methods. The results were then analyzed to generate per‐seed and per‐needle loading time and exposure burdens. Formulas are presented that may be used to determine the average time to load implants and the resultant staff exposure, both with the conventional technique and with the sleeved method. On the average, it takes an experienced loader 48 min to prepare an implant for the operating room, receiving a hand dose of about 10 mrem and a whole body dose of about 1 mrem. The sleeved system reduced these values by at least half. The time and exposure burden associated with the preparation of iodine loose seed implants has been characterized. The use of the sleeved needles resulted in significant time and exposure reductions for the medical staff. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Xd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724534/ /pubmed/12383046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550 Text en © 2002 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Bice, W. S. Walker, E. S. Gearty, S. Walker, A. V. Marbach, J. R. Prestidge, B. R. A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title | A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bicews acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT walkeres acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT geartys acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT walkerav acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT marbachjr acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT prestidgebr acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT bicews comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT walkeres comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT geartys comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT walkerav comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT marbachjr comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT prestidgebr comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy |