Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy

The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bice, W. S., Walker, E. S., Gearty, S., Walker, A. V., Marbach, J. R., Prestidge, B. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550
_version_ 1783285378553217024
author Bice, W. S.
Walker, E. S.
Gearty, S.
Walker, A. V.
Marbach, J. R.
Prestidge, B. R.
author_facet Bice, W. S.
Walker, E. S.
Gearty, S.
Walker, A. V.
Marbach, J. R.
Prestidge, B. R.
author_sort Bice, W. S.
collection PubMed
description The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well as to investigate any improvement in the time or exposure burden due to the introduction of a new loading device. The movements and radiation exposures for two single, highly experienced dosimetrists were monitored for ten conventionally loaded iodine implant cases. These same cases were reloaded with dummy sources using the sleeved system to determine time savings, if any. Two of these ten cases were then loaded with live sources using the sleeved system to determine relative exposure to the loading staff between the two methods. The results were then analyzed to generate per‐seed and per‐needle loading time and exposure burdens. Formulas are presented that may be used to determine the average time to load implants and the resultant staff exposure, both with the conventional technique and with the sleeved method. On the average, it takes an experienced loader 48 min to prepare an implant for the operating room, receiving a hand dose of about 10 mrem and a whole body dose of about 1 mrem. The sleeved system reduced these values by at least half. The time and exposure burden associated with the preparation of iodine loose seed implants has been characterized. The use of the sleeved needles resulted in significant time and exposure reductions for the medical staff. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Xd
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57245342018-04-02 A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy Bice, W. S. Walker, E. S. Gearty, S. Walker, A. V. Marbach, J. R. Prestidge, B. R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The loading of needles for loose seed implantation of the prostate gland results requires a significant amount of effort and some radiation exposure to members of the medical staff. This study was performed to quantify the time spent and exposure levels associated with implant preparation, as well as to investigate any improvement in the time or exposure burden due to the introduction of a new loading device. The movements and radiation exposures for two single, highly experienced dosimetrists were monitored for ten conventionally loaded iodine implant cases. These same cases were reloaded with dummy sources using the sleeved system to determine time savings, if any. Two of these ten cases were then loaded with live sources using the sleeved system to determine relative exposure to the loading staff between the two methods. The results were then analyzed to generate per‐seed and per‐needle loading time and exposure burdens. Formulas are presented that may be used to determine the average time to load implants and the resultant staff exposure, both with the conventional technique and with the sleeved method. On the average, it takes an experienced loader 48 min to prepare an implant for the operating room, receiving a hand dose of about 10 mrem and a whole body dose of about 1 mrem. The sleeved system reduced these values by at least half. The time and exposure burden associated with the preparation of iodine loose seed implants has been characterized. The use of the sleeved needles resulted in significant time and exposure reductions for the medical staff. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Xd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724534/ /pubmed/12383046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550 Text en © 2002 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Bice, W. S.
Walker, E. S.
Gearty, S.
Walker, A. V.
Marbach, J. R.
Prestidge, B. R.
A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_full A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_short A comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_sort comparative evaluation of loading times and exposures for permanent prostate brachytherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2550
work_keys_str_mv AT bicews acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT walkeres acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT geartys acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT walkerav acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT marbachjr acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT prestidgebr acomparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT bicews comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT walkeres comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT geartys comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT walkerav comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT marbachjr comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT prestidgebr comparativeevaluationofloadingtimesandexposuresforpermanentprostatebrachytherapy