Cargando…

A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Background: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers. Materials and Methods: This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadek, Paul, Pan, Xiao, Shepherd, Phil, Malandain, Elise, Carney, John, Coleman, Hugh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jcr.2017.0025
_version_ 1783285384737718272
author Sadek, Paul
Pan, Xiao
Shepherd, Phil
Malandain, Elise
Carney, John
Coleman, Hugh
author_facet Sadek, Paul
Pan, Xiao
Shepherd, Phil
Malandain, Elise
Carney, John
Coleman, Hugh
author_sort Sadek, Paul
collection PubMed
description Background: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers. Materials and Methods: This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Caffeinated chewing gum and a serving of instant coffee, each containing ∼50 mg caffeine, were administered with blood samples collected before and up to 24 hours after administration starts. Plasma caffeine levels were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology. Results: There were no statistical differences between the two caffeine products in t(max) (p = 0.3308) and k(a) (p = 0.3894). Although formulated at ∼50 mg caffeine each, mean dose released from chewing gum was ∼18% less than beverage. Dose-normalized area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)(0-t), AUC(0-∞), and C(max) was similar between products. Although the criteria were not set a priori and the study was not powered for concluding bioequivalence, the 90% confidence intervals fell within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%. Conclusions: Existing scientific literature on caffeine, based mostly on data from caffeinated beverages, can be leveraged to support the safety of caffeine delivered by chewing gum and current maximum safe caffeine dose advice should be applicable irrespective of delivery method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57245812017-12-11 A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers Sadek, Paul Pan, Xiao Shepherd, Phil Malandain, Elise Carney, John Coleman, Hugh J Caffeine Res Original Research Articles Background: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers. Materials and Methods: This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Caffeinated chewing gum and a serving of instant coffee, each containing ∼50 mg caffeine, were administered with blood samples collected before and up to 24 hours after administration starts. Plasma caffeine levels were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology. Results: There were no statistical differences between the two caffeine products in t(max) (p = 0.3308) and k(a) (p = 0.3894). Although formulated at ∼50 mg caffeine each, mean dose released from chewing gum was ∼18% less than beverage. Dose-normalized area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)(0-t), AUC(0-∞), and C(max) was similar between products. Although the criteria were not set a priori and the study was not powered for concluding bioequivalence, the 90% confidence intervals fell within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%. Conclusions: Existing scientific literature on caffeine, based mostly on data from caffeinated beverages, can be leveraged to support the safety of caffeine delivered by chewing gum and current maximum safe caffeine dose advice should be applicable irrespective of delivery method. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-12-01 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724581/ /pubmed/29230348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jcr.2017.0025 Text en © Paul Sadek et al. 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This article is available under the Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Permission only needs to be obtained for commercial use and can be done via RightsLink.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Sadek, Paul
Pan, Xiao
Shepherd, Phil
Malandain, Elise
Carney, John
Coleman, Hugh
A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title_full A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title_fullStr A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title_short A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers
title_sort randomized, two-way crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum versus a marketed caffeinated beverage in healthy adult volunteers
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jcr.2017.0025
work_keys_str_mv AT sadekpaul arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT panxiao arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT shepherdphil arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT malandainelise arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT carneyjohn arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT colemanhugh arandomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT sadekpaul randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT panxiao randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT shepherdphil randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT malandainelise randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT carneyjohn randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers
AT colemanhugh randomizedtwowaycrossoverstudytoevaluatethepharmacokineticsofcaffeinedeliveredusingcaffeinatedchewinggumversusamarketedcaffeinatedbeverageinhealthyadultvolunteers