A comparison of computer‐controlled versus manual on‐line patient setup adjustment

A study was performed to determine the relative advantage of computer‐controlled couch movement versus manual repositioning to correct patient setup error measured using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Twenty‐eight on‐line setup adjustment trials of anterior‐posterior (AP) pelvic projections were evaluated, with 13 setups corrected by automated couch movement determined by direct feedback from the EPID image alignment tool and 15 setups manually corrected based on the transformation displayed from the same tool. The speed of setup adjustment and accuracy of corrected setup were determined. Computer controlled setup adjustment was determined to be faster (25.4 s versus 101.9 s) and slightly more accurate (1.8 mm versus 2.5 mm error in adjusted setup) than manual correction. PACS number(s): 87.57.–s, 87.53.–j