Cargando…

Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant

We describe a fast, PC‐based optimization planning system for a planar permanent‐seed implant. Sites where this system is applicable include brain, lung, and head and neck. The system described here allowsplacing ribbons of different strengths and of different lengths along and across the implant pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fung, Albert Y. C., Amols, Howard I., Zaider, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12132944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2566
_version_ 1783285387362304000
author Fung, Albert Y. C.
Amols, Howard I.
Zaider, Marco
author_facet Fung, Albert Y. C.
Amols, Howard I.
Zaider, Marco
author_sort Fung, Albert Y. C.
collection PubMed
description We describe a fast, PC‐based optimization planning system for a planar permanent‐seed implant. Sites where this system is applicable include brain, lung, and head and neck. The system described here allowsplacing ribbons of different strengths and of different lengths along and across the implant plane. The program takes full advantage of the availability of different source strengths in inventory, and attempts to find configurations of ribbons that result in optimal dose uniformity over the prescription plane. Dosimetry is based on the AAPM TG 43 Report [R. Nath et al., Med. Phys. 22, 209–234 (1995)]. Compared with TG 43 parameters, the classical tables underestimate the I‐125 source strengths needed by 40%. The use of several source strengths improves the plan. Typical optimization yields dose uniformity of 10%, and computing times are within 2–3 min No further enhancement is obtained if ribbons are placed in a grid pattern as opposed to the (simpler) arrangement along parallel lines. Nor is it valuable to have variable ribbon lengths. For an I‐125 implant the optimization system described here is a practical alternative to the (strictly speaking inapplicable) classical systems. It calculates correctly the total source strengths, and ‐ most notably ‐ generates plans with optimal dose uniformity. The fast computing time is well suited for planning during surgery in the operating room. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57245962018-04-02 Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant Fung, Albert Y. C. Amols, Howard I. Zaider, Marco J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We describe a fast, PC‐based optimization planning system for a planar permanent‐seed implant. Sites where this system is applicable include brain, lung, and head and neck. The system described here allowsplacing ribbons of different strengths and of different lengths along and across the implant plane. The program takes full advantage of the availability of different source strengths in inventory, and attempts to find configurations of ribbons that result in optimal dose uniformity over the prescription plane. Dosimetry is based on the AAPM TG 43 Report [R. Nath et al., Med. Phys. 22, 209–234 (1995)]. Compared with TG 43 parameters, the classical tables underestimate the I‐125 source strengths needed by 40%. The use of several source strengths improves the plan. Typical optimization yields dose uniformity of 10%, and computing times are within 2–3 min No further enhancement is obtained if ribbons are placed in a grid pattern as opposed to the (simpler) arrangement along parallel lines. Nor is it valuable to have variable ribbon lengths. For an I‐125 implant the optimization system described here is a practical alternative to the (strictly speaking inapplicable) classical systems. It calculates correctly the total source strengths, and ‐ most notably ‐ generates plans with optimal dose uniformity. The fast computing time is well suited for planning during surgery in the operating room. PACS number(s): 87.53Jw, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724596/ /pubmed/12132944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2566 Text en © 2002 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Fung, Albert Y. C.
Amols, Howard I.
Zaider, Marco
Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title_full Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title_fullStr Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title_full_unstemmed Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title_short Optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
title_sort optimized planning for intraoperative planar permanent‐seed implant
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12132944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2566
work_keys_str_mv AT fungalbertyc optimizedplanningforintraoperativeplanarpermanentseedimplant
AT amolshowardi optimizedplanningforintraoperativeplanarpermanentseedimplant
AT zaidermarco optimizedplanningforintraoperativeplanarpermanentseedimplant