Cargando…

Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system

An inverse treatment planning (ITP) module on a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) (Helax AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is being used for an in‐house clinical trial for treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer with contralateral parotid sparing. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields are deliv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKenzie, M. A., Lachaine, M., Murray, B., Fallone, B. G., Robinson, D., Field, G. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11958650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2580
_version_ 1783285390236450816
author MacKenzie, M. A.
Lachaine, M.
Murray, B.
Fallone, B. G.
Robinson, D.
Field, G. C.
author_facet MacKenzie, M. A.
Lachaine, M.
Murray, B.
Fallone, B. G.
Robinson, D.
Field, G. C.
author_sort MacKenzie, M. A.
collection PubMed
description An inverse treatment planning (ITP) module on a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) (Helax AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is being used for an in‐house clinical trial for treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer with contralateral parotid sparing. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields are delivered by step and shoot multileaf collimator (MLC) with a DMLC enabled Varian 2300 CD (Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA). A series of testing procedures have been devised to quantify the modeling and delivery accuracy of routine clinical inverse planned IMRT using Helax TMS and the Varian step and shoot MLC delivery option. Testing was done on specific aspects of the TPS modeling germane to DMLC. Measured relative dose factors (head scatter plus phantom scatter) for small MLC fields, normalized to a [Formula: see text] non‐MLC field, were found to differ by [Formula: see text] from the TPS values for the smallest of the fields tested. Relative distributions for small off axis fields were found to be in good agreement. A process for the routine clinical verification of IMRT fields has been implemented. Each IMRT field in an inverse plan is imported into a flat water tank plan and a “beam's eye view” (BEV) dose distribution is generated. This is compared to the corresponding measured BEV dose distribution. The IMRT verification process has also been performed using an anthropomorphic phantom. Large clinical fields (i.e., greater than 14.5 cm in the leaf direction) caused difficulties due to a vendor specific machine restriction, and several techniques for dealing with these were examined. These techniques were (i) the use of static stepping of closed junctions, (ii) the use of two separate IMRT fields for a given gantry angle, and (iii) restricting the overall maximum field size used. The overall process has allowed implementation of an in‐house protocol for IMRT use on an initial clinical site. Results of the verification measurements for the first ten patients treated at this center reveal an average maximum dose per IMRT field delivered of 71.0 cGy, with a mean local deviation from the planned dose of – 1.2 cGy, and a standard deviation of 2.4 cGy. PACS number(s): 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57246082018-04-02 Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system MacKenzie, M. A. Lachaine, M. Murray, B. Fallone, B. G. Robinson, D. Field, G. C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An inverse treatment planning (ITP) module on a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) (Helax AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is being used for an in‐house clinical trial for treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer with contralateral parotid sparing. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields are delivered by step and shoot multileaf collimator (MLC) with a DMLC enabled Varian 2300 CD (Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA). A series of testing procedures have been devised to quantify the modeling and delivery accuracy of routine clinical inverse planned IMRT using Helax TMS and the Varian step and shoot MLC delivery option. Testing was done on specific aspects of the TPS modeling germane to DMLC. Measured relative dose factors (head scatter plus phantom scatter) for small MLC fields, normalized to a [Formula: see text] non‐MLC field, were found to differ by [Formula: see text] from the TPS values for the smallest of the fields tested. Relative distributions for small off axis fields were found to be in good agreement. A process for the routine clinical verification of IMRT fields has been implemented. Each IMRT field in an inverse plan is imported into a flat water tank plan and a “beam's eye view” (BEV) dose distribution is generated. This is compared to the corresponding measured BEV dose distribution. The IMRT verification process has also been performed using an anthropomorphic phantom. Large clinical fields (i.e., greater than 14.5 cm in the leaf direction) caused difficulties due to a vendor specific machine restriction, and several techniques for dealing with these were examined. These techniques were (i) the use of static stepping of closed junctions, (ii) the use of two separate IMRT fields for a given gantry angle, and (iii) restricting the overall maximum field size used. The overall process has allowed implementation of an in‐house protocol for IMRT use on an initial clinical site. Results of the verification measurements for the first ten patients treated at this center reveal an average maximum dose per IMRT field delivered of 71.0 cGy, with a mean local deviation from the planned dose of – 1.2 cGy, and a standard deviation of 2.4 cGy. PACS number(s): 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724608/ /pubmed/11958650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2580 Text en © 2002 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
MacKenzie, M. A.
Lachaine, M.
Murray, B.
Fallone, B. G.
Robinson, D.
Field, G. C.
Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title_full Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title_fullStr Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title_short Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
title_sort dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11958650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2580
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenziema dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem
AT lachainem dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem
AT murrayb dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem
AT fallonebg dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem
AT robinsond dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem
AT fieldgc dosimetricverificationofinverseplannedstepandshootmultileafcollimatorfieldsfromacommercialtreatmentplanningsystem