Cargando…

CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume

This study presents a 3D dose mapping of complex dose distributions using an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) polymer gel dosimetry technique. Two polyacrylamide gels (PAGs) of identical composition were irradiated with the same four arc stereotactic treatment to maximum doses of 15 Gy (PAG1) and 8 Gy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Audet, C., Hilts, M., Jirasek, A., Duzenli, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11958651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2575
_version_ 1783285390959968256
author Audet, C.
Hilts, M.
Jirasek, A.
Duzenli, C.
author_facet Audet, C.
Hilts, M.
Jirasek, A.
Duzenli, C.
author_sort Audet, C.
collection PubMed
description This study presents a 3D dose mapping of complex dose distributions using an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) polymer gel dosimetry technique. Two polyacrylamide gels (PAGs) of identical composition were irradiated with the same four arc stereotactic treatment to maximum doses of 15 Gy (PAG1) and 8 Gy (PAG2). The PAGs were CT imaged using a previously defined protocol that involves image averaging and background subtraction to improve image quality. For comparison with the planned isodose distribution, the PAG images were converted to relative dose maps using a CT number‐dose calibration curve or simple division. The PAG images were then co‐registered with the planning CT images in the BrainLab® treatment planning software which automatically provides reconstructed sagittal and coronal images for 3D evaluation of measured and planned dose. The hypo‐intense high dose region in both sets of gel images agreed with the planned 80% isodose contour and was shifted by up to 1.5 and 3.0 mm in the axial and reconstructed planes, respectively. This demonstrates the ability of the CT gel technique to accurately localize the high dose region produced by the stereotactic treatment. The resulting agreement of the measured relative dose volume for PAG1 was within 3.0 mm for the 50% and 80% isodose surfaces. However, the dose contrast was too low in PAG2 to allow for accurate definition of measured relative dose surfaces. Thus, a PAG should be irradiated to higher doses if quantitative relative dose information is required. Unfortunately, this implies use of an additional PAG and its CT number dose response since doses greater than 8–10 Gy fall outside the linear regions of the response. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.57.–s, 87.59.Fm
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57246112018-04-02 CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume Audet, C. Hilts, M. Jirasek, A. Duzenli, C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study presents a 3D dose mapping of complex dose distributions using an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) polymer gel dosimetry technique. Two polyacrylamide gels (PAGs) of identical composition were irradiated with the same four arc stereotactic treatment to maximum doses of 15 Gy (PAG1) and 8 Gy (PAG2). The PAGs were CT imaged using a previously defined protocol that involves image averaging and background subtraction to improve image quality. For comparison with the planned isodose distribution, the PAG images were converted to relative dose maps using a CT number‐dose calibration curve or simple division. The PAG images were then co‐registered with the planning CT images in the BrainLab® treatment planning software which automatically provides reconstructed sagittal and coronal images for 3D evaluation of measured and planned dose. The hypo‐intense high dose region in both sets of gel images agreed with the planned 80% isodose contour and was shifted by up to 1.5 and 3.0 mm in the axial and reconstructed planes, respectively. This demonstrates the ability of the CT gel technique to accurately localize the high dose region produced by the stereotactic treatment. The resulting agreement of the measured relative dose volume for PAG1 was within 3.0 mm for the 50% and 80% isodose surfaces. However, the dose contrast was too low in PAG2 to allow for accurate definition of measured relative dose surfaces. Thus, a PAG should be irradiated to higher doses if quantitative relative dose information is required. Unfortunately, this implies use of an additional PAG and its CT number dose response since doses greater than 8–10 Gy fall outside the linear regions of the response. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.57.–s, 87.59.Fm John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2002-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5724611/ /pubmed/11958651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2575 Text en © 2002 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Audet, C.
Hilts, M.
Jirasek, A.
Duzenli, C.
CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title_full CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title_fullStr CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title_full_unstemmed CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title_short CT gel dosimetry technique: Comparison of a planned and measured 3D stereotactic dose volume
title_sort ct gel dosimetry technique: comparison of a planned and measured 3d stereotactic dose volume
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11958651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2575
work_keys_str_mv AT audetc ctgeldosimetrytechniquecomparisonofaplannedandmeasured3dstereotacticdosevolume
AT hiltsm ctgeldosimetrytechniquecomparisonofaplannedandmeasured3dstereotacticdosevolume
AT jiraseka ctgeldosimetrytechniquecomparisonofaplannedandmeasured3dstereotacticdosevolume
AT duzenlic ctgeldosimetrytechniquecomparisonofaplannedandmeasured3dstereotacticdosevolume