Cargando…

Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses

Objective: To evaluate fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns designed with different porcelain layer thicknesses. Materials and Methods: Sixty crowns, divided into six groups of 10, were used in this study. Groups were divided according to different thicknesses of porcel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakitian, Fahad, Seweryniak, Przemek, Papia, Evaggelia, Larsson, Christel, Vult von Steyern, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1403288
_version_ 1783285415479869440
author Bakitian, Fahad
Seweryniak, Przemek
Papia, Evaggelia
Larsson, Christel
Vult von Steyern, Per
author_facet Bakitian, Fahad
Seweryniak, Przemek
Papia, Evaggelia
Larsson, Christel
Vult von Steyern, Per
author_sort Bakitian, Fahad
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns designed with different porcelain layer thicknesses. Materials and Methods: Sixty crowns, divided into six groups of 10, were used in this study. Groups were divided according to different thicknesses of porcelain veneer on translucent zirconium dioxide cores of equal thickness (0.5 mm). Porcelain thicknesses were 2.5, 2.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.5 and 0.3 mm. Crowns were artificially aged before loaded to fracture. Determination of fracture mode was performed using light microscope. Results: Group 1.0 mm showed significantly (p ≤ .05) highest fracture loads (mean 1540 N) in comparison with groups 2.5, 2.0 and 0.3 mm (mean 851, 910 and 1202 N). There was no significant difference (p>.05) in fracture loads among groups 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5 mm (mean 1540, 1313 and 1286 N). There were significantly (p ≤ .05) more complete fractures in group 0.3 mm compared to all other groups which presented mainly cohesive fractures. Conclusions: Translucent zirconium dioxide crowns can be veneered with minimal thickness layer of 0.5 mm porcelain without showing significantly reduced fracture strength compared to traditionally veneered (1.0–2.0 mm) crowns. Fracture strength of micro-veneered crowns with a layer of porcelain (0.3 mm) is lower than that of traditionally veneered crowns but still within range of what may be considered clinically sufficient. Porcelain layers of 2.0 mm or thicker should be used where expected loads are low only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57248002017-12-14 Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses Bakitian, Fahad Seweryniak, Przemek Papia, Evaggelia Larsson, Christel Vult von Steyern, Per Acta Biomater Odontol Scand Original Article Objective: To evaluate fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns designed with different porcelain layer thicknesses. Materials and Methods: Sixty crowns, divided into six groups of 10, were used in this study. Groups were divided according to different thicknesses of porcelain veneer on translucent zirconium dioxide cores of equal thickness (0.5 mm). Porcelain thicknesses were 2.5, 2.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.5 and 0.3 mm. Crowns were artificially aged before loaded to fracture. Determination of fracture mode was performed using light microscope. Results: Group 1.0 mm showed significantly (p ≤ .05) highest fracture loads (mean 1540 N) in comparison with groups 2.5, 2.0 and 0.3 mm (mean 851, 910 and 1202 N). There was no significant difference (p>.05) in fracture loads among groups 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5 mm (mean 1540, 1313 and 1286 N). There were significantly (p ≤ .05) more complete fractures in group 0.3 mm compared to all other groups which presented mainly cohesive fractures. Conclusions: Translucent zirconium dioxide crowns can be veneered with minimal thickness layer of 0.5 mm porcelain without showing significantly reduced fracture strength compared to traditionally veneered (1.0–2.0 mm) crowns. Fracture strength of micro-veneered crowns with a layer of porcelain (0.3 mm) is lower than that of traditionally veneered crowns but still within range of what may be considered clinically sufficient. Porcelain layers of 2.0 mm or thicker should be used where expected loads are low only. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5724800/ /pubmed/29242815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1403288 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bakitian, Fahad
Seweryniak, Przemek
Papia, Evaggelia
Larsson, Christel
Vult von Steyern, Per
Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title_full Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title_fullStr Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title_full_unstemmed Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title_short Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
title_sort fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1403288
work_keys_str_mv AT bakitianfahad fracturestrengthofveneeredtranslucentzirconiumdioxidecrownswithdifferentporcelainthicknesses
AT seweryniakprzemek fracturestrengthofveneeredtranslucentzirconiumdioxidecrownswithdifferentporcelainthicknesses
AT papiaevaggelia fracturestrengthofveneeredtranslucentzirconiumdioxidecrownswithdifferentporcelainthicknesses
AT larssonchristel fracturestrengthofveneeredtranslucentzirconiumdioxidecrownswithdifferentporcelainthicknesses
AT vultvonsteyernper fracturestrengthofveneeredtranslucentzirconiumdioxidecrownswithdifferentporcelainthicknesses