Cargando…

Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: We examined the usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The diagnostic accuracy of the NMP22 BladderChek tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zijie, Que, Hongliang, Suo, Chuanjian, Han, Zhijian, Tao, Jun, Huang, Zhengkai, Ju, Xiaobin, Tan, Ruoyun, Gu, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246009
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22065
_version_ 1783285465604947968
author Wang, Zijie
Que, Hongliang
Suo, Chuanjian
Han, Zhijian
Tao, Jun
Huang, Zhengkai
Ju, Xiaobin
Tan, Ruoyun
Gu, Min
author_facet Wang, Zijie
Que, Hongliang
Suo, Chuanjian
Han, Zhijian
Tao, Jun
Huang, Zhengkai
Ju, Xiaobin
Tan, Ruoyun
Gu, Min
author_sort Wang, Zijie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The diagnostic accuracy of the NMP22 BladderChek test was evaluated via pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve (AUC). Inter-study heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: We included 23 studies in the systematic review and 19 in the quantitative meta-analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 56% (52–59%) and 88% (87–89%), respectively; pooled PLR and NLR were 4.36 (3.02–6.29) and 0.51 (0.40–0.66), respectively; DOR was 9.29 (5.55–15.55) with an AUC of 0.8295. The mean sensitivity for Ta, T1, ≥ T2, Tis, G1, G2, and G3 disease was 13.68%, 29.49%, 74.03%, 34.62%, 44.16%, 56.25%, and 67.34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NMP22 BladderChek test shows good discrimination ability for detecting bladder cancer and a high-specificity algorithm that can be used for early detection to rule out patients with higher bladder cancer risk. It also has better potential for screening higher-grade and higher-stage tumors, and better diagnostic performance in Asians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5725051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57250512017-12-14 Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Zijie Que, Hongliang Suo, Chuanjian Han, Zhijian Tao, Jun Huang, Zhengkai Ju, Xiaobin Tan, Ruoyun Gu, Min Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: We examined the usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The diagnostic accuracy of the NMP22 BladderChek test was evaluated via pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve (AUC). Inter-study heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: We included 23 studies in the systematic review and 19 in the quantitative meta-analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 56% (52–59%) and 88% (87–89%), respectively; pooled PLR and NLR were 4.36 (3.02–6.29) and 0.51 (0.40–0.66), respectively; DOR was 9.29 (5.55–15.55) with an AUC of 0.8295. The mean sensitivity for Ta, T1, ≥ T2, Tis, G1, G2, and G3 disease was 13.68%, 29.49%, 74.03%, 34.62%, 44.16%, 56.25%, and 67.34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NMP22 BladderChek test shows good discrimination ability for detecting bladder cancer and a high-specificity algorithm that can be used for early detection to rule out patients with higher bladder cancer risk. It also has better potential for screening higher-grade and higher-stage tumors, and better diagnostic performance in Asians. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5725051/ /pubmed/29246009 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22065 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Wang, Zijie
Que, Hongliang
Suo, Chuanjian
Han, Zhijian
Tao, Jun
Huang, Zhengkai
Ju, Xiaobin
Tan, Ruoyun
Gu, Min
Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of the nmp22 bladderchek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246009
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22065
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzijie evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quehongliang evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suochuanjian evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanzhijian evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taojun evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangzhengkai evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT juxiaobin evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanruoyun evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gumin evaluationofthenmp22bladderchektestfordetectingbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis