Cargando…
Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all
This study sought to determine whether additional radiotherapy is necessary in patients after optimal surgery for stage IIA rectal cancer and how the different covariates influence the efficacy of radiotherapy. The first primary rectal cancer was identified from the 1988–December 2013 Surveillance,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29245914 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19683 |
_version_ | 1783285478654476288 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Xiang Li, Ya-Qi Li, Qing-Guo Ma, Yan-Lei Peng, Jun-Jie Cai, San-Jun |
author_facet | Hu, Xiang Li, Ya-Qi Li, Qing-Guo Ma, Yan-Lei Peng, Jun-Jie Cai, San-Jun |
author_sort | Hu, Xiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study sought to determine whether additional radiotherapy is necessary in patients after optimal surgery for stage IIA rectal cancer and how the different covariates influence the efficacy of radiotherapy. The first primary rectal cancer was identified from the 1988–December 2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. We identified 13647 patients with IIA rectal cancer, in which 39.6% received neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and in another 14.96% patients the adjuvant radiotherapy were performed. Neo-adjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy group had better survival with 10-Year cancer-specific survival estimates as 75.1% and 73.8% compared to 68.4% of no radiotherapy group (P < 0.01). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) demonstrated neo-adjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR: 0.814 and 0.848) were all associated with significantly decreased risk for cancer death. However, radiotherapy did not seem to yield the same survival benefit in selected population. Adjusted stratified analysis demonstrated patients with increasing age, relative large tumor size, and more retrieved regional lymph nodes had no additional benefit for cancer specific survival based on radiation use. In conclusions, unselected patients with stage IIA rectal cancer receiving radiotherapy experienced better survival in comparison to patients without radiation. However, additional radiotherapy is not beneficial for all. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5725105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57251052017-12-14 Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all Hu, Xiang Li, Ya-Qi Li, Qing-Guo Ma, Yan-Lei Peng, Jun-Jie Cai, San-Jun Oncotarget Research Paper This study sought to determine whether additional radiotherapy is necessary in patients after optimal surgery for stage IIA rectal cancer and how the different covariates influence the efficacy of radiotherapy. The first primary rectal cancer was identified from the 1988–December 2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. We identified 13647 patients with IIA rectal cancer, in which 39.6% received neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and in another 14.96% patients the adjuvant radiotherapy were performed. Neo-adjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy group had better survival with 10-Year cancer-specific survival estimates as 75.1% and 73.8% compared to 68.4% of no radiotherapy group (P < 0.01). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) demonstrated neo-adjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR: 0.814 and 0.848) were all associated with significantly decreased risk for cancer death. However, radiotherapy did not seem to yield the same survival benefit in selected population. Adjusted stratified analysis demonstrated patients with increasing age, relative large tumor size, and more retrieved regional lymph nodes had no additional benefit for cancer specific survival based on radiation use. In conclusions, unselected patients with stage IIA rectal cancer receiving radiotherapy experienced better survival in comparison to patients without radiation. However, additional radiotherapy is not beneficial for all. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5725105/ /pubmed/29245914 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19683 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hu, Xiang Li, Ya-Qi Li, Qing-Guo Ma, Yan-Lei Peng, Jun-Jie Cai, San-Jun Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title | Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title_full | Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title_fullStr | Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title_short | Radiotherapy for stage IIA rectal cancer may not benefit all |
title_sort | radiotherapy for stage iia rectal cancer may not benefit all |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29245914 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxiang radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall AT liyaqi radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall AT liqingguo radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall AT mayanlei radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall AT pengjunjie radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall AT caisanjun radiotherapyforstageiiarectalcancermaynotbenefitall |