Cargando…

Hearing loss screening tool (COBRA score) for newborns in primary care setting

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a simple screening tool to assess hearing loss in newborns. A derived score was compared with the standard clinical practice tool. METHODS: This cohort study was designed to screen the hearing of newborns using transiently evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poonual, Watcharapol, Navacharoen, Niramon, Kangsanarak, Jaran, Namwongprom, Sirianong, Saokaew, Surasak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pediatric Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2017.60.11.353
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a simple screening tool to assess hearing loss in newborns. A derived score was compared with the standard clinical practice tool. METHODS: This cohort study was designed to screen the hearing of newborns using transiently evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response, and to determine the risk factors associated with hearing loss of newborns in 3 tertiary hospitals in Northern Thailand. Data were prospectively collected from November 1, 2010 to May 31, 2012. To develop the risk score, clinical-risk indicators were measured by Poisson risk regression. The regression coefficients were transformed into item scores dividing each regression-coefficient with the smallest coefficient in the model, rounding the number to its nearest integer, and adding up to a total score. RESULTS: Five clinical risk factors (Craniofacial anomaly, Ototoxicity, Birth weight, family history [Relative] of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, and Apgar score) were included in our COBRA score. The screening tool detected, by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, more than 80% of existing hearing loss. The positive-likelihood ratio of hearing loss in patients with scores of 4, 6, and 8 were 25.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.69–43.26), 58.52 (95% CI, 36.26–94.44), and 51.56 (95% CI, 33.74–78.82), respectively. This result was similar to the standard tool (The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing) of 26.72 (95% CI, 20.59–34.66). CONCLUSION: A simple screening tool of five predictors provides good prediction indices for newborn hearing loss, which may motivate parents to bring children for further appropriate testing and investigations.