Cargando…

Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study

BACKGROUND: Currently, people at risk for dementia and their caregivers are confronted with confusing choices about what behavioral interventions are most effective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine which empirically supported behavioral interventions most impact the outcomes h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Glenn, Chandler, Melanie, Locke, Dona EC, Fields, Julie, Phatak, Vaishali, Crook, Julia, Hanna, Sherrie, Lunde, Angela, Morris, Miranda, Graff-Radford, Michelle, Hughes, Christine A, Lepore, Susan, Cuc, Andrea, Caselli, Maria, Hurst, Duane, Wethe, Jennifer, Francone, Andrea, Eilertsen, Jeanne, Lucas, Pauline, Hoffman Snyder, Charlene, Kuang, LeeAnn, Becker, Marigrace, Dean, Pamela, Diehl, Nancy, Lofquist, Marvin, Vanderhook, Shirley, Myles, Diana, Cochran, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8103
_version_ 1783285569844936704
author Smith, Glenn
Chandler, Melanie
Locke, Dona EC
Fields, Julie
Phatak, Vaishali
Crook, Julia
Hanna, Sherrie
Lunde, Angela
Morris, Miranda
Graff-Radford, Michelle
Hughes, Christine A
Lepore, Susan
Cuc, Andrea
Caselli, Maria
Hurst, Duane
Wethe, Jennifer
Francone, Andrea
Eilertsen, Jeanne
Lucas, Pauline
Hoffman Snyder, Charlene
Kuang, LeeAnn
Becker, Marigrace
Dean, Pamela
Diehl, Nancy
Lofquist, Marvin
Vanderhook, Shirley
Myles, Diana
Cochran, Denise
author_facet Smith, Glenn
Chandler, Melanie
Locke, Dona EC
Fields, Julie
Phatak, Vaishali
Crook, Julia
Hanna, Sherrie
Lunde, Angela
Morris, Miranda
Graff-Radford, Michelle
Hughes, Christine A
Lepore, Susan
Cuc, Andrea
Caselli, Maria
Hurst, Duane
Wethe, Jennifer
Francone, Andrea
Eilertsen, Jeanne
Lucas, Pauline
Hoffman Snyder, Charlene
Kuang, LeeAnn
Becker, Marigrace
Dean, Pamela
Diehl, Nancy
Lofquist, Marvin
Vanderhook, Shirley
Myles, Diana
Cochran, Denise
author_sort Smith, Glenn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, people at risk for dementia and their caregivers are confronted with confusing choices about what behavioral interventions are most effective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine which empirically supported behavioral interventions most impact the outcomes highly valued by patients with mild cognitive impairment and their partners. METHODS: This protocol describes a comparative effectiveness trial targeting 300 participants with mild cognitive impairment and their study partners. The trial is being conducted at the Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and the University of Washington in Seattle. The study examines the contribution of five behavioral interventions (yoga, memory compensation training, computerized cognitive training, support groups, and wellness education) on primary outcomes of participant and partner quality of life and self-efficacy. In this unique 10-day multicomponent intervention, groups of couples were randomized to have one of the five interventions withheld while receiving the other four. Although the longitudinal follow-up is still under way, enrollment results are available and reported. RESULTS: In total, 272 couples have been enrolled in the trial and follow-up visits continue. Outcomes will be assessed at the end-of-intervention and 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups. We anticipate reporting on our primary and secondary outcomes across time points in the next 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes the protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness study of behavioral interventions to prevent or delay dementia. We describe of the rationale, design, power analysis, and analysis plan. Also because enrollment is complete and we are in follow-up phases of the study, we have included enrollment data from the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02265757; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ctsshow/ NCT02265757 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ueRfwSYv)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5725623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57256232017-12-14 Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study Smith, Glenn Chandler, Melanie Locke, Dona EC Fields, Julie Phatak, Vaishali Crook, Julia Hanna, Sherrie Lunde, Angela Morris, Miranda Graff-Radford, Michelle Hughes, Christine A Lepore, Susan Cuc, Andrea Caselli, Maria Hurst, Duane Wethe, Jennifer Francone, Andrea Eilertsen, Jeanne Lucas, Pauline Hoffman Snyder, Charlene Kuang, LeeAnn Becker, Marigrace Dean, Pamela Diehl, Nancy Lofquist, Marvin Vanderhook, Shirley Myles, Diana Cochran, Denise JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Currently, people at risk for dementia and their caregivers are confronted with confusing choices about what behavioral interventions are most effective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine which empirically supported behavioral interventions most impact the outcomes highly valued by patients with mild cognitive impairment and their partners. METHODS: This protocol describes a comparative effectiveness trial targeting 300 participants with mild cognitive impairment and their study partners. The trial is being conducted at the Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and the University of Washington in Seattle. The study examines the contribution of five behavioral interventions (yoga, memory compensation training, computerized cognitive training, support groups, and wellness education) on primary outcomes of participant and partner quality of life and self-efficacy. In this unique 10-day multicomponent intervention, groups of couples were randomized to have one of the five interventions withheld while receiving the other four. Although the longitudinal follow-up is still under way, enrollment results are available and reported. RESULTS: In total, 272 couples have been enrolled in the trial and follow-up visits continue. Outcomes will be assessed at the end-of-intervention and 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups. We anticipate reporting on our primary and secondary outcomes across time points in the next 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes the protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness study of behavioral interventions to prevent or delay dementia. We describe of the rationale, design, power analysis, and analysis plan. Also because enrollment is complete and we are in follow-up phases of the study, we have included enrollment data from the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02265757; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ctsshow/ NCT02265757 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ueRfwSYv) JMIR Publications 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5725623/ /pubmed/29180344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8103 Text en ©Glenn Smith, Melanie Chandler, Dona EC Locke, Julie Fields, Vaishali Phatak, Julia Crook, Sherrie Hanna, Angela Lunde, Miranda Morris, Michelle Graff-Radford, Christine A Hughes, Susan Lepore, Andrea Cuc, Maria Caselli, Duane Hurst, Jennifer Wethe, Andrea Francone, Jeanne Eilertsen, Pauline Lucas, Charlene Hoffman Snyder, LeeAnn Kuang, Marigrace Becker, Pamela Dean, Nancy Diehl, Marvin Lofquist, Shirley Vanderhook, Diana Myles, Denise Cochran. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 27.11.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Smith, Glenn
Chandler, Melanie
Locke, Dona EC
Fields, Julie
Phatak, Vaishali
Crook, Julia
Hanna, Sherrie
Lunde, Angela
Morris, Miranda
Graff-Radford, Michelle
Hughes, Christine A
Lepore, Susan
Cuc, Andrea
Caselli, Maria
Hurst, Duane
Wethe, Jennifer
Francone, Andrea
Eilertsen, Jeanne
Lucas, Pauline
Hoffman Snyder, Charlene
Kuang, LeeAnn
Becker, Marigrace
Dean, Pamela
Diehl, Nancy
Lofquist, Marvin
Vanderhook, Shirley
Myles, Diana
Cochran, Denise
Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title_full Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title_fullStr Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title_short Behavioral Interventions to Prevent or Delay Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
title_sort behavioral interventions to prevent or delay dementia: protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8103
work_keys_str_mv AT smithglenn behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT chandlermelanie behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT lockedonaec behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT fieldsjulie behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT phatakvaishali behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT crookjulia behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT hannasherrie behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT lundeangela behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT morrismiranda behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT graffradfordmichelle behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT hugheschristinea behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT leporesusan behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT cucandrea behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT casellimaria behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT hurstduane behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT wethejennifer behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT franconeandrea behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT eilertsenjeanne behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT lucaspauline behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT hoffmansnydercharlene behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT kuangleeann behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT beckermarigrace behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT deanpamela behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT diehlnancy behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT lofquistmarvin behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT vanderhookshirley behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT mylesdiana behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy
AT cochrandenise behavioralinterventionstopreventordelaydementiaprotocolforarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessstudy