Cargando…
The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds
Molecular methods allow noninvasive assessment of vertebrate predator–prey systems at high taxonomic resolution by examining dietary samples such as faeces and pellets. To facilitate the interpretation of field‐derived data, feeding trials, investigating the impacts of biological, methodological and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12706 |
_version_ | 1783285609338503168 |
---|---|
author | Thalinger, Bettina Oehm, Johannes Obwexer, Armin Traugott, Michael |
author_facet | Thalinger, Bettina Oehm, Johannes Obwexer, Armin Traugott, Michael |
author_sort | Thalinger, Bettina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular methods allow noninvasive assessment of vertebrate predator–prey systems at high taxonomic resolution by examining dietary samples such as faeces and pellets. To facilitate the interpretation of field‐derived data, feeding trials, investigating the impacts of biological, methodological and environmental factors on prey DNA detection, have been conducted. The effect of meal size, however, has not yet been explicitly considered for vertebrate consumers. Moreover, different noninvasively obtained sample types remain to be compared in such experiments. Here, we present a feeding trial on abundant piscivorous birds, Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo), to assess meal size effects on postfeeding prey DNA detection success. Faeces and pellets were sampled twice a day after the feed of large (350–540 g), medium (190–345 g) and small (15–170 g) fish meals contributing either a large (>79%) or small (<38%) share to the daily consumption. Samples were examined for prey DNA and fish hard parts. Molecular analysis of faeces revealed that both large meal size and share had a significantly positive effect on prey DNA detection rate postfeeding. Furthermore, large meals were detectable for a significantly longer time span with a detection limit at ~76 hr and a 50% detection probability at ~32 hr postfeeding. In pellets, molecular methods reliably identified the meal consumed the previous day, which was not possible via morphological analysis or when examining individual faeces. The less reliable prey DNA detection of small meals or meal shares in faeces signifies the importance of large numbers of dietary samples to obtain reliable trophic data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5725817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57258172017-12-18 The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds Thalinger, Bettina Oehm, Johannes Obwexer, Armin Traugott, Michael Mol Ecol Resour RESOURCE ARTICLES Molecular methods allow noninvasive assessment of vertebrate predator–prey systems at high taxonomic resolution by examining dietary samples such as faeces and pellets. To facilitate the interpretation of field‐derived data, feeding trials, investigating the impacts of biological, methodological and environmental factors on prey DNA detection, have been conducted. The effect of meal size, however, has not yet been explicitly considered for vertebrate consumers. Moreover, different noninvasively obtained sample types remain to be compared in such experiments. Here, we present a feeding trial on abundant piscivorous birds, Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo), to assess meal size effects on postfeeding prey DNA detection success. Faeces and pellets were sampled twice a day after the feed of large (350–540 g), medium (190–345 g) and small (15–170 g) fish meals contributing either a large (>79%) or small (<38%) share to the daily consumption. Samples were examined for prey DNA and fish hard parts. Molecular analysis of faeces revealed that both large meal size and share had a significantly positive effect on prey DNA detection rate postfeeding. Furthermore, large meals were detectable for a significantly longer time span with a detection limit at ~76 hr and a 50% detection probability at ~32 hr postfeeding. In pellets, molecular methods reliably identified the meal consumed the previous day, which was not possible via morphological analysis or when examining individual faeces. The less reliable prey DNA detection of small meals or meal shares in faeces signifies the importance of large numbers of dietary samples to obtain reliable trophic data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-14 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5725817/ /pubmed/28776942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12706 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESOURCE ARTICLES Thalinger, Bettina Oehm, Johannes Obwexer, Armin Traugott, Michael The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title | The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title_full | The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title_fullStr | The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title_short | The influence of meal size on prey DNA detectability in piscivorous birds |
title_sort | influence of meal size on prey dna detectability in piscivorous birds |
topic | RESOURCE ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thalingerbettina theinfluenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT oehmjohannes theinfluenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT obwexerarmin theinfluenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT traugottmichael theinfluenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT thalingerbettina influenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT oehmjohannes influenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT obwexerarmin influenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds AT traugottmichael influenceofmealsizeonpreydnadetectabilityinpiscivorousbirds |