Cargando…

How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The CARe methodology aims to improve the quality of life of people with severe mental illness by supporting them in realizing their goals, handling their vulnerability and improving the quality of their social environment. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the CARe meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitter, Neis, Roeg, Diana, van Assen, Marcel, van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs, van Weeghel, Jaap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1565-y
_version_ 1783285609600647168
author Bitter, Neis
Roeg, Diana
van Assen, Marcel
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs
van Weeghel, Jaap
author_facet Bitter, Neis
Roeg, Diana
van Assen, Marcel
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs
van Weeghel, Jaap
author_sort Bitter, Neis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The CARe methodology aims to improve the quality of life of people with severe mental illness by supporting them in realizing their goals, handling their vulnerability and improving the quality of their social environment. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the CARe methodology for people with severe mental illness on their quality of life, personal recovery, participation, hope, empowerment, self-efficacy beliefs and unmet needs. METHODS: A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted in 14 teams of three organizations for sheltered and supported housing in the Netherlands. Teams in the intervention group received training in the CARe methodology. Teams in the control group continued working according to care as usual. Questionnaires were filled out at baseline, after 10 months and after 20 months. A total of 263 clients participated in the study. RESULTS: Quality of life increased in both groups, however, no differences between the intervention and control group were found. Recovery and social functioning did not change over time. Regarding the secondary outcomes, the number of unmet needs decreased in both groups. All intervention teams received the complete training program. The model fidelity at T1 was 53.4% for the intervention group and 33.4% for the control group. At T2 this was 50.6% for the intervention group and 37.2% for the control group. CONCLUSION: All clients improved in quality of life. However we did not find significant differences between the clients of the both conditions on any outcome measure. Possible explanations of these results are: the difficulty to implement rehabilitation-supporting practice, the content of the methodology and the difficulty to improve the lives of a group of people with longstanding and severe impairments in a relatively short period. More research is needed on how to improve effects of rehabilitation trainings in practice and on outcome level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN77355880, retrospectively registered (05/07/2013).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5725818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57258182017-12-13 How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial Bitter, Neis Roeg, Diana van Assen, Marcel van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs van Weeghel, Jaap BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The CARe methodology aims to improve the quality of life of people with severe mental illness by supporting them in realizing their goals, handling their vulnerability and improving the quality of their social environment. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the CARe methodology for people with severe mental illness on their quality of life, personal recovery, participation, hope, empowerment, self-efficacy beliefs and unmet needs. METHODS: A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted in 14 teams of three organizations for sheltered and supported housing in the Netherlands. Teams in the intervention group received training in the CARe methodology. Teams in the control group continued working according to care as usual. Questionnaires were filled out at baseline, after 10 months and after 20 months. A total of 263 clients participated in the study. RESULTS: Quality of life increased in both groups, however, no differences between the intervention and control group were found. Recovery and social functioning did not change over time. Regarding the secondary outcomes, the number of unmet needs decreased in both groups. All intervention teams received the complete training program. The model fidelity at T1 was 53.4% for the intervention group and 33.4% for the control group. At T2 this was 50.6% for the intervention group and 37.2% for the control group. CONCLUSION: All clients improved in quality of life. However we did not find significant differences between the clients of the both conditions on any outcome measure. Possible explanations of these results are: the difficulty to implement rehabilitation-supporting practice, the content of the methodology and the difficulty to improve the lives of a group of people with longstanding and severe impairments in a relatively short period. More research is needed on how to improve effects of rehabilitation trainings in practice and on outcome level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN77355880, retrospectively registered (05/07/2013). BioMed Central 2017-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5725818/ /pubmed/29228919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1565-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bitter, Neis
Roeg, Diana
van Assen, Marcel
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs
van Weeghel, Jaap
How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort how effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (care) methodology? a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1565-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bitterneis howeffectiveisthecomprehensiveapproachtorehabilitationcaremethodologyaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT roegdiana howeffectiveisthecomprehensiveapproachtorehabilitationcaremethodologyaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanassenmarcel howeffectiveisthecomprehensiveapproachtorehabilitationcaremethodologyaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vannieuwenhuizenchijs howeffectiveisthecomprehensiveapproachtorehabilitationcaremethodologyaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanweegheljaap howeffectiveisthecomprehensiveapproachtorehabilitationcaremethodologyaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial