Cargando…

A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Medical simulators offer an invaluable educational resource for medical trainees. However, owing to cost and portability restrictions, they have traditionally been limited to simulation centres. With the advent of sophisticated mobile technology, simulators have become cheaper and more a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartlett, Richard D., Radenkovic, Dina, Mitrasinovic, Stefan, Cole, Andrew, Pavkovic, Iva, Denn, Peyton Cheong Phey, Hussain, Mahrukh, Kogler, Magdalena, Koutsopodioti, Natalia, Uddin, Wasima, Beckley, Ivan, Abubakar, Hana, Gill, Deborah, Smith, Daron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1085-y
_version_ 1783285609852305408
author Bartlett, Richard D.
Radenkovic, Dina
Mitrasinovic, Stefan
Cole, Andrew
Pavkovic, Iva
Denn, Peyton Cheong Phey
Hussain, Mahrukh
Kogler, Magdalena
Koutsopodioti, Natalia
Uddin, Wasima
Beckley, Ivan
Abubakar, Hana
Gill, Deborah
Smith, Daron
author_facet Bartlett, Richard D.
Radenkovic, Dina
Mitrasinovic, Stefan
Cole, Andrew
Pavkovic, Iva
Denn, Peyton Cheong Phey
Hussain, Mahrukh
Kogler, Magdalena
Koutsopodioti, Natalia
Uddin, Wasima
Beckley, Ivan
Abubakar, Hana
Gill, Deborah
Smith, Daron
author_sort Bartlett, Richard D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical simulators offer an invaluable educational resource for medical trainees. However, owing to cost and portability restrictions, they have traditionally been limited to simulation centres. With the advent of sophisticated mobile technology, simulators have become cheaper and more accessible. Touch Surgery is one such freely downloadable mobile application simulator (MAS) used by over one million healthcare professionals worldwide. Nevertheless, to date, it has never been formally validated as an adjunct in undergraduate medical education. METHODS: Medical students in the final 3 years of their programme were recruited and randomised to one of three revision interventions: 1) no formal revision resources, 2) traditional revision resources, or 3) MAS. Students completed pre-test questionnaires and were then assessed on their ability to complete an undisclosed male urinary catheterisation scenario. Following a one-hour quarantined revision period, all students repeated the scenario. Both attempts were scored by allocation-blinded examiners against an objective 46-point mark scheme. RESULTS: A total of 27 medical students were randomised (n = 9 per group). Mean scores improved between baseline and post-revision attempts by 8.7% (p = 0.003), 19.8% (p = 0.0001), and 15.9% (p = 0.001) for no resources, traditional resources, and MAS, respectively. However, when comparing mean score improvements between groups there were no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile simulators offer an unconventional, yet potentially useful adjunct to enhance undergraduate clinical skills education. Our results indicate that MAS’s perform comparably to current gold-standard revision resources; however, they may confer significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and practice flexibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1085-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5725819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57258192017-12-13 A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial Bartlett, Richard D. Radenkovic, Dina Mitrasinovic, Stefan Cole, Andrew Pavkovic, Iva Denn, Peyton Cheong Phey Hussain, Mahrukh Kogler, Magdalena Koutsopodioti, Natalia Uddin, Wasima Beckley, Ivan Abubakar, Hana Gill, Deborah Smith, Daron BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical simulators offer an invaluable educational resource for medical trainees. However, owing to cost and portability restrictions, they have traditionally been limited to simulation centres. With the advent of sophisticated mobile technology, simulators have become cheaper and more accessible. Touch Surgery is one such freely downloadable mobile application simulator (MAS) used by over one million healthcare professionals worldwide. Nevertheless, to date, it has never been formally validated as an adjunct in undergraduate medical education. METHODS: Medical students in the final 3 years of their programme were recruited and randomised to one of three revision interventions: 1) no formal revision resources, 2) traditional revision resources, or 3) MAS. Students completed pre-test questionnaires and were then assessed on their ability to complete an undisclosed male urinary catheterisation scenario. Following a one-hour quarantined revision period, all students repeated the scenario. Both attempts were scored by allocation-blinded examiners against an objective 46-point mark scheme. RESULTS: A total of 27 medical students were randomised (n = 9 per group). Mean scores improved between baseline and post-revision attempts by 8.7% (p = 0.003), 19.8% (p = 0.0001), and 15.9% (p = 0.001) for no resources, traditional resources, and MAS, respectively. However, when comparing mean score improvements between groups there were no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile simulators offer an unconventional, yet potentially useful adjunct to enhance undergraduate clinical skills education. Our results indicate that MAS’s perform comparably to current gold-standard revision resources; however, they may confer significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and practice flexibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1085-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5725819/ /pubmed/29228934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1085-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bartlett, Richard D.
Radenkovic, Dina
Mitrasinovic, Stefan
Cole, Andrew
Pavkovic, Iva
Denn, Peyton Cheong Phey
Hussain, Mahrukh
Kogler, Magdalena
Koutsopodioti, Natalia
Uddin, Wasima
Beckley, Ivan
Abubakar, Hana
Gill, Deborah
Smith, Daron
A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_full A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_short A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_sort pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1085-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bartlettrichardd apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT radenkovicdina apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitrasinovicstefan apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coleandrew apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pavkoviciva apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dennpeytoncheongphey apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hussainmahrukh apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koglermagdalena apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koutsopodiotinatalia apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT uddinwasima apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beckleyivan apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT abubakarhana apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gilldeborah apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithdaron apilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bartlettrichardd pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT radenkovicdina pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitrasinovicstefan pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coleandrew pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pavkoviciva pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dennpeytoncheongphey pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hussainmahrukh pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koglermagdalena pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koutsopodiotinatalia pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT uddinwasima pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beckleyivan pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT abubakarhana pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gilldeborah pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithdaron pilotstudytoassesstheutilityofafreelydownloadablemobileapplicationsimulatorforundergraduateclinicalskillstrainingasingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial