Cargando…
Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8 |
_version_ | 1783285628555755520 |
---|---|
author | Verduijn, Judith Verhoeven, Josine E. Milaneschi, Yuri Schoevers, Robert A. van Hemert, Albert M. Beekman, Aartjan T. F. Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. |
author_facet | Verduijn, Judith Verhoeven, Josine E. Milaneschi, Yuri Schoevers, Robert A. van Hemert, Albert M. Beekman, Aartjan T. F. Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. |
author_sort | Verduijn, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. METHODS: Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). RESULTS: With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5725897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57258972017-12-13 Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule Verduijn, Judith Verhoeven, Josine E. Milaneschi, Yuri Schoevers, Robert A. van Hemert, Albert M. Beekman, Aartjan T. F. Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often handled as an episodic and isolated disorder, resulting in an optimistic view about its prognosis. Herein, we test the idea that the prognosis of MDD changes if we vary the perspective in terms of (1) a longer time frame and (2) a broader diagnostic conceptualisation including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders as relevant outcomes. METHODS: Patients with current MDD at baseline (n = 903) and available 2-, 4-, and/or 6-year follow-up assessments were selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a psychiatric cohort study. Combining psychiatric DSM-IV-based diagnoses and life-chart data, patient course trajectories were classified as (1) recovered (no diagnoses at 2-year follow-up or thereafter), (2) recurrent without chronic episodes, (3) recurrent with chronic episodes or (4) consistently chronic since baseline. A chronic episode was defined as having a current diagnosis at the follow-up assessment and consistent symptoms over 2 years. Proportions of course trajectories were provided moving from a short, narrow perspective (2-year follow-up, considering only MDD diagnosis) to a long, broad perspective (6-year follow-up, including MDD, dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety diagnoses). RESULTS: With the short, narrow perspective, the recovery rate was 58% and 21% had a chronic episode. However, in the long, broad perspective the recovery rate was reduced to 17%, while 55% of the patients experienced chronic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Results from a long and rigorous follow-up in a large cohort suggests that most MDD patients have an unfavourable prognosis. Longer follow-up and broader diagnostic conceptualisation show that the majority of patients have a disabling and chronic disorder. Conceptualising and handling MDD as a narrowly defined and episodic disorder may underestimate the prognosis of the majority of depressed patients and, consequently, the type of care that is appropriate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5725897/ /pubmed/29228943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verduijn, Judith Verhoeven, Josine E. Milaneschi, Yuri Schoevers, Robert A. van Hemert, Albert M. Beekman, Aartjan T. F. Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title | Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_full | Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_fullStr | Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_short | Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
title_sort | reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verduijnjudith reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT verhoevenjosinee reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT milaneschiyuri reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT schoeversroberta reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT vanhemertalbertm reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT beekmanaartjantf reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule AT penninxbrendawjh reconsideringtheprognosisofmajordepressivedisorderacrossdiagnosticboundariesfullrecoveryistheexceptionratherthantherule |