Cargando…

Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy

We have developed a treatment planning protocol for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy of the prostate using commercially available inverse planning software. Treatment plans were developed for ten patients using the Corvus version 3.8 planning system, testing various prescription options, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ezzell, Gary A., Schild, Steven E., Wong, William W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2614
_version_ 1783285650146983936
author Ezzell, Gary A.
Schild, Steven E.
Wong, William W.
author_facet Ezzell, Gary A.
Schild, Steven E.
Wong, William W.
author_sort Ezzell, Gary A.
collection PubMed
description We have developed a treatment planning protocol for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy of the prostate using commercially available inverse planning software. Treatment plans were developed for ten patients using the Corvus version 3.8 planning system, testing various prescription options, including tissue types, dose volume histogram values for the target and normal structures, beam arrangements, and number of intensity levels. All plans were scaled so that 95% of the clinical target volume received 75.6 Gy; mean doses to the prostate were typically 79 Gy. The reproducibility of the inverse planning algorithm was tested by repeating a set of the plans five times. Plans were deemed acceptable if they satisfied predefined dose constraints for the targets and critical organs. Figures of merit for target coverage, target dose uniformity, and organ sparing were used to rank acceptable plans. Certain systematic behaviors of the optimizer were noted: the high dose regions for both targets and critical organs were 5–10 Gy more than prescribed; reducing bladder and rectum tolerance increased the range of doses within the target; increasing the number of fields incrementally improved plan quality. A set of planning parameters was found that usually satisfied the minimum requirements. Repeating the optimization with different beam order produced similar but slightly different dose distributions, which was sometimes useful for finding acceptable solutions for difficult cases. The standard set of parameters serves as a useful starting point for individualized planning. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57260022018-04-02 Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy Ezzell, Gary A. Schild, Steven E. Wong, William W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We have developed a treatment planning protocol for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy of the prostate using commercially available inverse planning software. Treatment plans were developed for ten patients using the Corvus version 3.8 planning system, testing various prescription options, including tissue types, dose volume histogram values for the target and normal structures, beam arrangements, and number of intensity levels. All plans were scaled so that 95% of the clinical target volume received 75.6 Gy; mean doses to the prostate were typically 79 Gy. The reproducibility of the inverse planning algorithm was tested by repeating a set of the plans five times. Plans were deemed acceptable if they satisfied predefined dose constraints for the targets and critical organs. Figures of merit for target coverage, target dose uniformity, and organ sparing were used to rank acceptable plans. Certain systematic behaviors of the optimizer were noted: the high dose regions for both targets and critical organs were 5–10 Gy more than prescribed; reducing bladder and rectum tolerance increased the range of doses within the target; increasing the number of fields incrementally improved plan quality. A set of planning parameters was found that usually satisfied the minimum requirements. Repeating the optimization with different beam order produced similar but slightly different dose distributions, which was sometimes useful for finding acceptable solutions for difficult cases. The standard set of parameters serves as a useful starting point for individualized planning. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726002/ /pubmed/11604050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2614 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ezzell, Gary A.
Schild, Steven E.
Wong, William W.
Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title_full Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title_short Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
title_sort development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2614
work_keys_str_mv AT ezzellgarya developmentofatreatmentplanningprotocolforprostatetreatmentsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT schildstevene developmentofatreatmentplanningprotocolforprostatetreatmentsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT wongwilliamw developmentofatreatmentplanningprotocolforprostatetreatmentsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy