Cargando…

Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography

Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effectiveness and suitability of a quality control (QC) phantom for a routine QC program in digital radiography. Materials and Methods: The chest phantom consists of copper and aluminum cutouts arranged to resemble the appearance of a chest. Performance of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mah, Eugene, Samei, Ehsan, Peck, Donald J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2621
_version_ 1783285650392350720
author Mah, Eugene
Samei, Ehsan
Peck, Donald J.
author_facet Mah, Eugene
Samei, Ehsan
Peck, Donald J.
author_sort Mah, Eugene
collection PubMed
description Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effectiveness and suitability of a quality control (QC) phantom for a routine QC program in digital radiography. Materials and Methods: The chest phantom consists of copper and aluminum cutouts arranged to resemble the appearance of a chest. Performance of the digital radiography (DR) system is evaluated using high and low contrast resolution objects placed in the “heart,” “lung,” and “subdiaphragm” areas of the phantom. In addition, the signal levels from these areas were compared to similar areas from clinical chest radiographs. Results: The test objects included within the phantom were effective in assessing image quality except within the subdiaphragm area, where most of the low contrast disks were visible. Spatial resolution for the DR systems evaluated with the phantom ranged from 2.6 lp/mm to 4 lp/mm, falling within the middle of the line pair range provided. The signal levels of the heart and diaphragm regions relative to the lung region of the phantom were significantly higher than in clinical chest radiographs (0.67 versus 0.21 and 0.28 versus 0.10 for the heart and diaphragm regions, respectively). The heart‐to‐diaphragm signal level ratio, however, was comparable to those in clinical radiographs. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the attenuation characteristics of the phantom are somewhat different from actual chests, but this did not appear to affect the post‐processing used by the imaging systems and usefulness for QC of these systems. The qualitative and quantitative measurements on the phantom for different systems were similar, suggesting that a single phantom can be used to evaluate system performance in a routine QC program for a wide range of digital radiography systems. This makes the implementation of a uniform QC program easier for institutions with a mixture of different digital radiography systems. PACS number(s): 87.57.–s, 87.62.+n
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57260032018-04-02 Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography Mah, Eugene Samei, Ehsan Peck, Donald J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effectiveness and suitability of a quality control (QC) phantom for a routine QC program in digital radiography. Materials and Methods: The chest phantom consists of copper and aluminum cutouts arranged to resemble the appearance of a chest. Performance of the digital radiography (DR) system is evaluated using high and low contrast resolution objects placed in the “heart,” “lung,” and “subdiaphragm” areas of the phantom. In addition, the signal levels from these areas were compared to similar areas from clinical chest radiographs. Results: The test objects included within the phantom were effective in assessing image quality except within the subdiaphragm area, where most of the low contrast disks were visible. Spatial resolution for the DR systems evaluated with the phantom ranged from 2.6 lp/mm to 4 lp/mm, falling within the middle of the line pair range provided. The signal levels of the heart and diaphragm regions relative to the lung region of the phantom were significantly higher than in clinical chest radiographs (0.67 versus 0.21 and 0.28 versus 0.10 for the heart and diaphragm regions, respectively). The heart‐to‐diaphragm signal level ratio, however, was comparable to those in clinical radiographs. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the attenuation characteristics of the phantom are somewhat different from actual chests, but this did not appear to affect the post‐processing used by the imaging systems and usefulness for QC of these systems. The qualitative and quantitative measurements on the phantom for different systems were similar, suggesting that a single phantom can be used to evaluate system performance in a routine QC program for a wide range of digital radiography systems. This makes the implementation of a uniform QC program easier for institutions with a mixture of different digital radiography systems. PACS number(s): 87.57.–s, 87.62.+n John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726003/ /pubmed/11604054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2621 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Mah, Eugene
Samei, Ehsan
Peck, Donald J.
Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title_full Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title_fullStr Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title_short Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
title_sort evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2621
work_keys_str_mv AT maheugene evaluationofaqualitycontrolphantomfordigitalchestradiography
AT sameiehsan evaluationofaqualitycontrolphantomfordigitalchestradiography
AT peckdonaldj evaluationofaqualitycontrolphantomfordigitalchestradiography