Cargando…
Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system
We report on initial patient studies to evaluate the performance of a commercial respiratory gating radiotherapy system. The system uses a breathing monitor, consisting of a video camera and passive infrared reflective markers placed on the patient's thorax, to synchronize radiation from a line...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i4.2596 |
_version_ | 1783285651375915008 |
---|---|
author | Mageras, Gikas S. Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth Braban, Louise Keatley, Eric Ford, Eric Leibel, Steven A. Ling, C. Clifton |
author_facet | Mageras, Gikas S. Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth Braban, Louise Keatley, Eric Ford, Eric Leibel, Steven A. Ling, C. Clifton |
author_sort | Mageras, Gikas S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We report on initial patient studies to evaluate the performance of a commercial respiratory gating radiotherapy system. The system uses a breathing monitor, consisting of a video camera and passive infrared reflective markers placed on the patient's thorax, to synchronize radiation from a linear accelerator with the patient's breathing cycle. Six patients receiving treatment for lung cancer participated in a study of system characteristics during treatment simulation with fluoroscopy. Breathing synchronized fluoroscopy was performed initially without instruction, followed by fluoroscopy with recorded verbal instruction (i.e., when to inhale and exhale) with the tempo matched to the patient's normal breathing period. Patients tended to inhale more consistently when given instruction, as assessed by an external marker movement. This resulted in smaller variation in expiration and inspiration marker positions relative to total excursion, thereby permitting more precise gating tolerances at those parts of the breathing cycle. Breathing instruction also reduced the fraction of session times having irregular breathing as measured by the system software, thereby potentially increasing the accelerator duty factor and decreasing treatment times. Fluoroscopy studies showed external monitor movement to correlate well with that of the diaphragm in four patients, whereas time delays of up to 0.7 s in diaphragm movement were observed in two patients with impaired lung function. From fluoroscopic observations, average patient diaphragm excursion was reduced from 1.4 cm (range 0.7–2.1 cm) without gating and without breathing instruction, to 0.3 cm (range 0.2–0.5 cm) with instruction and with gating tolerances set for treatment at expiration for 25% of the breathing cycle. Patients expressed no difficulty with following instruction for the duration of a session. We conclude that the external monitor accurately predicts internal respiratory motion in most cases; however, it may be important to check with fluoroscopy for possible time delays in patients with impaired lung function. Furthermore, we observe that verbal instruction can improve breathing regularity, thus improving the performance of gated treatments with this system. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.62.+n |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260072018-04-02 Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system Mageras, Gikas S. Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth Braban, Louise Keatley, Eric Ford, Eric Leibel, Steven A. Ling, C. Clifton J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We report on initial patient studies to evaluate the performance of a commercial respiratory gating radiotherapy system. The system uses a breathing monitor, consisting of a video camera and passive infrared reflective markers placed on the patient's thorax, to synchronize radiation from a linear accelerator with the patient's breathing cycle. Six patients receiving treatment for lung cancer participated in a study of system characteristics during treatment simulation with fluoroscopy. Breathing synchronized fluoroscopy was performed initially without instruction, followed by fluoroscopy with recorded verbal instruction (i.e., when to inhale and exhale) with the tempo matched to the patient's normal breathing period. Patients tended to inhale more consistently when given instruction, as assessed by an external marker movement. This resulted in smaller variation in expiration and inspiration marker positions relative to total excursion, thereby permitting more precise gating tolerances at those parts of the breathing cycle. Breathing instruction also reduced the fraction of session times having irregular breathing as measured by the system software, thereby potentially increasing the accelerator duty factor and decreasing treatment times. Fluoroscopy studies showed external monitor movement to correlate well with that of the diaphragm in four patients, whereas time delays of up to 0.7 s in diaphragm movement were observed in two patients with impaired lung function. From fluoroscopic observations, average patient diaphragm excursion was reduced from 1.4 cm (range 0.7–2.1 cm) without gating and without breathing instruction, to 0.3 cm (range 0.2–0.5 cm) with instruction and with gating tolerances set for treatment at expiration for 25% of the breathing cycle. Patients expressed no difficulty with following instruction for the duration of a session. We conclude that the external monitor accurately predicts internal respiratory motion in most cases; however, it may be important to check with fluoroscopy for possible time delays in patients with impaired lung function. Furthermore, we observe that verbal instruction can improve breathing regularity, thus improving the performance of gated treatments with this system. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.62.+n John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726007/ /pubmed/11686740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i4.2596 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Mageras, Gikas S. Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth Braban, Louise Keatley, Eric Ford, Eric Leibel, Steven A. Ling, C. Clifton Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title | Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title_full | Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title_fullStr | Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title_short | Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
title_sort | fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion reduction with a respiratory gated radiotherapy system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i4.2596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magerasgikass fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT yorkeellen fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT rosenzweigkenneth fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT brabanlouise fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT keatleyeric fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT forderic fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT leibelstevena fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem AT lingcclifton fluoroscopicevaluationofdiaphragmaticmotionreductionwitharespiratorygatedradiotherapysystem |