Cargando…
Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623 |
_version_ | 1783285654484942848 |
---|---|
author | Miften, Moyed Wiesmeyer, Mark Kapur, Ajay Ma, C.‐M. Charlie |
author_facet | Miften, Moyed Wiesmeyer, Mark Kapur, Ajay Ma, C.‐M. Charlie |
author_sort | Miften, Moyed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distributions from the measurement‐based Clarkson and model‐based MultiGrid Superposition (MGS) algorithms with those from the beam Monte Carlo code system in a set of heterogeneous phantoms. The phantom inhomogeneities mimic relevant clinical treatment sites, which include lung slab, lung‐bone slab, bone‐lung slab, mediastinum, and tumor geometries. The benchmark comparisons were performed in lung densities of 0.20 and [Formula: see text] , and a bone density of [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and 15‐MV photon beams. Benchmark comparison results show that the MGS model and beam doses match better than 3% or 3 mm, and the MGS model is more accurate than the Clarkson model in all phantoms. The MGS model, unlike the Clarkson model, predicts the build‐down and build‐up of dose near tissue interfaces and penumbra broadening in lung associated with high energy beams. The Clarkson model overestimates the dose in lung by a maximum of 10% compared to beam. Dose comparisons suggest turning‐off the effective path length inhomogeneity correction in the Clarkson model for lung treatments. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.53.Bn |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260202018-04-02 Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system Miften, Moyed Wiesmeyer, Mark Kapur, Ajay Ma, C.‐M. Charlie J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distributions from the measurement‐based Clarkson and model‐based MultiGrid Superposition (MGS) algorithms with those from the beam Monte Carlo code system in a set of heterogeneous phantoms. The phantom inhomogeneities mimic relevant clinical treatment sites, which include lung slab, lung‐bone slab, bone‐lung slab, mediastinum, and tumor geometries. The benchmark comparisons were performed in lung densities of 0.20 and [Formula: see text] , and a bone density of [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and 15‐MV photon beams. Benchmark comparison results show that the MGS model and beam doses match better than 3% or 3 mm, and the MGS model is more accurate than the Clarkson model in all phantoms. The MGS model, unlike the Clarkson model, predicts the build‐down and build‐up of dose near tissue interfaces and penumbra broadening in lung associated with high energy beams. The Clarkson model overestimates the dose in lung by a maximum of 10% compared to beam. Dose comparisons suggest turning‐off the effective path length inhomogeneity correction in the Clarkson model for lung treatments. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.53.Bn John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726020/ /pubmed/11674835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Miften, Moyed Wiesmeyer, Mark Kapur, Ajay Ma, C.‐M. Charlie Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title | Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title_full | Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title_fullStr | Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title_short | Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system |
title_sort | comparison of rtp dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam monte carlo simulation system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miftenmoyed comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem AT wiesmeyermark comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem AT kapurajay comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem AT macmcharlie comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem |