Cargando…

Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system

Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miften, Moyed, Wiesmeyer, Mark, Kapur, Ajay, Ma, C.‐M. Charlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623
_version_ 1783285654484942848
author Miften, Moyed
Wiesmeyer, Mark
Kapur, Ajay
Ma, C.‐M. Charlie
author_facet Miften, Moyed
Wiesmeyer, Mark
Kapur, Ajay
Ma, C.‐M. Charlie
author_sort Miften, Moyed
collection PubMed
description Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distributions from the measurement‐based Clarkson and model‐based MultiGrid Superposition (MGS) algorithms with those from the beam Monte Carlo code system in a set of heterogeneous phantoms. The phantom inhomogeneities mimic relevant clinical treatment sites, which include lung slab, lung‐bone slab, bone‐lung slab, mediastinum, and tumor geometries. The benchmark comparisons were performed in lung densities of 0.20 and [Formula: see text] , and a bone density of [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and 15‐MV photon beams. Benchmark comparison results show that the MGS model and beam doses match better than 3% or 3 mm, and the MGS model is more accurate than the Clarkson model in all phantoms. The MGS model, unlike the Clarkson model, predicts the build‐down and build‐up of dose near tissue interfaces and penumbra broadening in lung associated with high energy beams. The Clarkson model overestimates the dose in lung by a maximum of 10% compared to beam. Dose comparisons suggest turning‐off the effective path length inhomogeneity correction in the Clarkson model for lung treatments. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.53.Bn
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57260202018-04-02 Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system Miften, Moyed Wiesmeyer, Mark Kapur, Ajay Ma, C.‐M. Charlie J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Therapeutic treatment plan evaluation is often based on examining the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) system dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. To study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on photon dose distributions, we compared FOCUS RTP system dose distributions from the measurement‐based Clarkson and model‐based MultiGrid Superposition (MGS) algorithms with those from the beam Monte Carlo code system in a set of heterogeneous phantoms. The phantom inhomogeneities mimic relevant clinical treatment sites, which include lung slab, lung‐bone slab, bone‐lung slab, mediastinum, and tumor geometries. The benchmark comparisons were performed in lung densities of 0.20 and [Formula: see text] , and a bone density of [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and 15‐MV photon beams. Benchmark comparison results show that the MGS model and beam doses match better than 3% or 3 mm, and the MGS model is more accurate than the Clarkson model in all phantoms. The MGS model, unlike the Clarkson model, predicts the build‐down and build‐up of dose near tissue interfaces and penumbra broadening in lung associated with high energy beams. The Clarkson model overestimates the dose in lung by a maximum of 10% compared to beam. Dose comparisons suggest turning‐off the effective path length inhomogeneity correction in the Clarkson model for lung treatments. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.53.Bn John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726020/ /pubmed/11674835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Miften, Moyed
Wiesmeyer, Mark
Kapur, Ajay
Ma, C.‐M. Charlie
Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title_full Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title_fullStr Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title_short Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam Monte Carlo simulation system
title_sort comparison of rtp dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the beam monte carlo simulation system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i1.2623
work_keys_str_mv AT miftenmoyed comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem
AT wiesmeyermark comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem
AT kapurajay comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem
AT macmcharlie comparisonofrtpdosedistributionsinheterogeneousphantomswiththebeammontecarlosimulationsystem