Cargando…
The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery
The control loop in the Varian DMLC system (V4.8) requires [Formula: see text] msec to monitor and halt the irradiation of a segment, causing an “overshoot” effect: the segment ends on a fractional monitor unit larger than that planned. As a result, the actual MU delivered may differ from that plann...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11602010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i3.2607 |
_version_ | 1783285659457290240 |
---|---|
author | Ezzell, Gary A. Chungbin, Suzanne |
author_facet | Ezzell, Gary A. Chungbin, Suzanne |
author_sort | Ezzell, Gary A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The control loop in the Varian DMLC system (V4.8) requires [Formula: see text] msec to monitor and halt the irradiation of a segment, causing an “overshoot” effect: the segment ends on a fractional monitor unit larger than that planned. As a result, the actual MU delivered may differ from that planned. In general, for step‐and‐shoot treatments, the first segment receives more, the last receives less, and intermediate segments vary. The overshoot for each segment (ΔMU) is small, approximately 0.6 MU at 600 MU/min Our IMRT planning system (Corvus) produces plans often having more than 20% of the segments with less than 1 MU/segment. Such segments may be skipped if the ΔMU exceeds the segments’ planned MU. Furthermore, QA filming often requires reducing the total MU by a factor of 4–6, increasing the potential for dosimetric error. This study measured ΔMU over a range of MU/min and MU/segment. At [Formula: see text] MU/segment, the ΔMU was stable, corresponding to a delay of 62 msec. ΔMU became larger and more variable at [Formula: see text] MU/segment. The behavior was modeled in a computer program that predicted the change in delivered MU/segment and total change in delivered MU to each beamlet. Beams were analyzed for patients receiving 5 field prostate or 9 field head and neck treatments. At 400 MU/min, 28% and 16%, respectively, of the planned segments were skipped. For QA filming, up to 75% of the segments were skipped. The cumulative error averaged [Formula: see text] MU/beamlet, but individual beamlets had errors exceeding 200%. The effect is most significant for low dose regions. Recommendations are given for deciding when to treat or do QA studies with lower MU/min. In general, treatments are not significantly affected, but QA films taken at reduced MU may be improved if irradiated at lowered MU/min. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260412018-04-02 The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery Ezzell, Gary A. Chungbin, Suzanne J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The control loop in the Varian DMLC system (V4.8) requires [Formula: see text] msec to monitor and halt the irradiation of a segment, causing an “overshoot” effect: the segment ends on a fractional monitor unit larger than that planned. As a result, the actual MU delivered may differ from that planned. In general, for step‐and‐shoot treatments, the first segment receives more, the last receives less, and intermediate segments vary. The overshoot for each segment (ΔMU) is small, approximately 0.6 MU at 600 MU/min Our IMRT planning system (Corvus) produces plans often having more than 20% of the segments with less than 1 MU/segment. Such segments may be skipped if the ΔMU exceeds the segments’ planned MU. Furthermore, QA filming often requires reducing the total MU by a factor of 4–6, increasing the potential for dosimetric error. This study measured ΔMU over a range of MU/min and MU/segment. At [Formula: see text] MU/segment, the ΔMU was stable, corresponding to a delay of 62 msec. ΔMU became larger and more variable at [Formula: see text] MU/segment. The behavior was modeled in a computer program that predicted the change in delivered MU/segment and total change in delivered MU to each beamlet. Beams were analyzed for patients receiving 5 field prostate or 9 field head and neck treatments. At 400 MU/min, 28% and 16%, respectively, of the planned segments were skipped. For QA filming, up to 75% of the segments were skipped. The cumulative error averaged [Formula: see text] MU/beamlet, but individual beamlets had errors exceeding 200%. The effect is most significant for low dose regions. Recommendations are given for deciding when to treat or do QA studies with lower MU/min. In general, treatments are not significantly affected, but QA films taken at reduced MU may be improved if irradiated at lowered MU/min. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2001-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5726041/ /pubmed/11602010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i3.2607 Text en © 2001 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Ezzell, Gary A. Chungbin, Suzanne The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title | The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title_full | The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title_fullStr | The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title_short | The overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery |
title_sort | overshoot phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot imrt delivery |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11602010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i3.2607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezzellgarya theovershootphenomenoninstepandshootimrtdelivery AT chungbinsuzanne theovershootphenomenoninstepandshootimrtdelivery AT ezzellgarya overshootphenomenoninstepandshootimrtdelivery AT chungbinsuzanne overshootphenomenoninstepandshootimrtdelivery |