Cargando…

The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals

OBJECTIVE: Although conceptual definitions of person-centred care (PCC) vary, most models value the involvement of patients through patient-professional partnerships. While this may increase patients’ sense of responsibility and control, research is needed to further understand how this partnership...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolf, Axel, Moore, Lucy, Lydahl, Doris, Naldemirci, Öncel, Elam, Mark, Britten, Nicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016491
_version_ 1783285665553711104
author Wolf, Axel
Moore, Lucy
Lydahl, Doris
Naldemirci, Öncel
Elam, Mark
Britten, Nicky
author_facet Wolf, Axel
Moore, Lucy
Lydahl, Doris
Naldemirci, Öncel
Elam, Mark
Britten, Nicky
author_sort Wolf, Axel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although conceptual definitions of person-centred care (PCC) vary, most models value the involvement of patients through patient-professional partnerships. While this may increase patients’ sense of responsibility and control, research is needed to further understand how this partnership is created and perceived. This study aims to explore the realities of partnership as perceived by patients and health professionals in everyday PCC practice. DESIGN: Qualitative study employing a thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with professionals and patients. SETTING: Four internal medicine wards and two primary care centres in western Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 16 health professionals based at hospital wards or primary care centres delivering person-centred care, and 20 patients admitted to one of the hospital wards. RESULTS: Our findings identified both informal and formal aspects of partnership. Informal aspects, emerging during the interaction between healthcare professionals and patients, without any prior guidelines or regulations, incorporated proximity and receptiveness of professionals and building a close connection and confidence. This epitomised a caring, respectful relationship congruent across accounts. Formal aspects, including structured ways of sustaining partnership were experienced differently. Professionals described collaborating with patients to encourage participation, capture personal goals, plan and document care. However, although patients felt listened to and informed, they were content to ask questions and felt less involved in care planning, documentation or exploring lifeworld goals. They commonly perceived participation as informed discussion and agreement, deferring to professional knowledge and expertise in the presence of an empathetic and trusting relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients appear to value a process of human connectedness above and beyond formalised aspects of documenting agreed goals and care planning. PCC increases patients’ confidence in professionals who are competent and able to make them feel safe and secure. Informal elements of partnership provide the conditions for communication and cooperation on which formal relations of partnership can be constructed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57260732017-12-19 The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals Wolf, Axel Moore, Lucy Lydahl, Doris Naldemirci, Öncel Elam, Mark Britten, Nicky BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Although conceptual definitions of person-centred care (PCC) vary, most models value the involvement of patients through patient-professional partnerships. While this may increase patients’ sense of responsibility and control, research is needed to further understand how this partnership is created and perceived. This study aims to explore the realities of partnership as perceived by patients and health professionals in everyday PCC practice. DESIGN: Qualitative study employing a thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with professionals and patients. SETTING: Four internal medicine wards and two primary care centres in western Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 16 health professionals based at hospital wards or primary care centres delivering person-centred care, and 20 patients admitted to one of the hospital wards. RESULTS: Our findings identified both informal and formal aspects of partnership. Informal aspects, emerging during the interaction between healthcare professionals and patients, without any prior guidelines or regulations, incorporated proximity and receptiveness of professionals and building a close connection and confidence. This epitomised a caring, respectful relationship congruent across accounts. Formal aspects, including structured ways of sustaining partnership were experienced differently. Professionals described collaborating with patients to encourage participation, capture personal goals, plan and document care. However, although patients felt listened to and informed, they were content to ask questions and felt less involved in care planning, documentation or exploring lifeworld goals. They commonly perceived participation as informed discussion and agreement, deferring to professional knowledge and expertise in the presence of an empathetic and trusting relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients appear to value a process of human connectedness above and beyond formalised aspects of documenting agreed goals and care planning. PCC increases patients’ confidence in professionals who are competent and able to make them feel safe and secure. Informal elements of partnership provide the conditions for communication and cooperation on which formal relations of partnership can be constructed. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5726073/ /pubmed/28716793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016491 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Wolf, Axel
Moore, Lucy
Lydahl, Doris
Naldemirci, Öncel
Elam, Mark
Britten, Nicky
The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title_full The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title_fullStr The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title_full_unstemmed The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title_short The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
title_sort realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016491
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfaxel therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT moorelucy therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT lydahldoris therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT naldemircioncel therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT elammark therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT brittennicky therealitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT wolfaxel realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT moorelucy realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT lydahldoris realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT naldemircioncel realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT elammark realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals
AT brittennicky realitiesofpartnershipinpersoncentredcareaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpatientsandprofessionals