Cargando…
No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28739442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024 |
_version_ | 1783285668170956800 |
---|---|
author | Henson, Richard N. Horner, Aidan J. Greve, Andrea Cooper, Elisa Gregori, Mariella Simons, Jon S. Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon Browne, Georgina Kapur, Narinder |
author_facet | Henson, Richard N. Horner, Aidan J. Greve, Andrea Cooper, Elisa Gregori, Mariella Simons, Jon S. Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon Browne, Georgina Kapur, Narinder |
author_sort | Henson, Richard N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal lobe damage, unlike healthy controls, failed to show evidence of reduced priming when response contingencies were reversed between initial and repeated categorisation of objects (a signature of S-R bindings). We ran a similar though extended object classification task on 6 patients who appear to have selective hippocampal lesions, together with 24 age-matched controls. Unlike Schnyer et al. (2006), we found that reversing response contingencies abolished priming in both controls and patients. Bayes Factors provided no reason to believe that response reversal had less effect on patients than controls. We therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the hippocampus is needed for S-R bindings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260842017-12-18 No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings Henson, Richard N. Horner, Aidan J. Greve, Andrea Cooper, Elisa Gregori, Mariella Simons, Jon S. Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon Browne, Georgina Kapur, Narinder Neuropsychologia Article The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal lobe damage, unlike healthy controls, failed to show evidence of reduced priming when response contingencies were reversed between initial and repeated categorisation of objects (a signature of S-R bindings). We ran a similar though extended object classification task on 6 patients who appear to have selective hippocampal lesions, together with 24 age-matched controls. Unlike Schnyer et al. (2006), we found that reversing response contingencies abolished priming in both controls and patients. Bayes Factors provided no reason to believe that response reversal had less effect on patients than controls. We therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the hippocampus is needed for S-R bindings. Pergamon Press 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5726084/ /pubmed/28739442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Henson, Richard N. Horner, Aidan J. Greve, Andrea Cooper, Elisa Gregori, Mariella Simons, Jon S. Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon Browne, Georgina Kapur, Narinder No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title | No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title_full | No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title_fullStr | No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title_full_unstemmed | No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title_short | No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
title_sort | no effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28739442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hensonrichardn noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT horneraidanj noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT greveandrea noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT cooperelisa noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT gregorimariella noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT simonsjons noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT erzinclioglusharon noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT brownegeorgina noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings AT kapurnarinder noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings |