Cargando…

No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings

The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henson, Richard N., Horner, Aidan J., Greve, Andrea, Cooper, Elisa, Gregori, Mariella, Simons, Jon S., Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon, Browne, Georgina, Kapur, Narinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28739442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024
_version_ 1783285668170956800
author Henson, Richard N.
Horner, Aidan J.
Greve, Andrea
Cooper, Elisa
Gregori, Mariella
Simons, Jon S.
Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon
Browne, Georgina
Kapur, Narinder
author_facet Henson, Richard N.
Horner, Aidan J.
Greve, Andrea
Cooper, Elisa
Gregori, Mariella
Simons, Jon S.
Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon
Browne, Georgina
Kapur, Narinder
author_sort Henson, Richard N.
collection PubMed
description The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal lobe damage, unlike healthy controls, failed to show evidence of reduced priming when response contingencies were reversed between initial and repeated categorisation of objects (a signature of S-R bindings). We ran a similar though extended object classification task on 6 patients who appear to have selective hippocampal lesions, together with 24 age-matched controls. Unlike Schnyer et al. (2006), we found that reversing response contingencies abolished priming in both controls and patients. Bayes Factors provided no reason to believe that response reversal had less effect on patients than controls. We therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the hippocampus is needed for S-R bindings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57260842017-12-18 No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings Henson, Richard N. Horner, Aidan J. Greve, Andrea Cooper, Elisa Gregori, Mariella Simons, Jon S. Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon Browne, Georgina Kapur, Narinder Neuropsychologia Article The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal lobe damage, unlike healthy controls, failed to show evidence of reduced priming when response contingencies were reversed between initial and repeated categorisation of objects (a signature of S-R bindings). We ran a similar though extended object classification task on 6 patients who appear to have selective hippocampal lesions, together with 24 age-matched controls. Unlike Schnyer et al. (2006), we found that reversing response contingencies abolished priming in both controls and patients. Bayes Factors provided no reason to believe that response reversal had less effect on patients than controls. We therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the hippocampus is needed for S-R bindings. Pergamon Press 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5726084/ /pubmed/28739442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Henson, Richard N.
Horner, Aidan J.
Greve, Andrea
Cooper, Elisa
Gregori, Mariella
Simons, Jon S.
Erzinçlioğlu, Sharon
Browne, Georgina
Kapur, Narinder
No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title_full No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title_fullStr No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title_full_unstemmed No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title_short No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
title_sort no effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28739442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024
work_keys_str_mv AT hensonrichardn noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT horneraidanj noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT greveandrea noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT cooperelisa noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT gregorimariella noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT simonsjons noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT erzinclioglusharon noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT brownegeorgina noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings
AT kapurnarinder noeffectofhippocampallesionsonstimulusresponsebindings