Cargando…
A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study
INTRODUCTION: Bringing together continuous quality improvement (CQI) data from multiple health services offers opportunities to identify common improvement priorities and to develop interventions at various system levels to achieve large-scale improvement in care. An important principle of CQI is pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016341 |
_version_ | 1783285669346410496 |
---|---|
author | Laycock, Alison Bailie, Jodie Matthews, Veronica Cunningham, Frances Harvey, Gillian Percival, Nikki Bailie, Ross |
author_facet | Laycock, Alison Bailie, Jodie Matthews, Veronica Cunningham, Frances Harvey, Gillian Percival, Nikki Bailie, Ross |
author_sort | Laycock, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Bringing together continuous quality improvement (CQI) data from multiple health services offers opportunities to identify common improvement priorities and to develop interventions at various system levels to achieve large-scale improvement in care. An important principle of CQI is practitioner participation in interpreting data and planning evidence-based change. This study will contribute knowledge about engaging diverse stakeholders in collaborative and theoretically informed processes to identify and address priority evidence-practice gaps in care delivery. This paper describes a developmental evaluation to support and refine a novel interactive dissemination project using aggregated CQI data from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary healthcare centres in Australia. The project aims to effect multilevel system improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be gathered using document analysis, online surveys, interviews with participants and iterative analytical processes with the research team. These methods will enable real-time feedback to guide refinements to the design, reports, tools and processes as the interactive dissemination project is implemented. Qualitative data from interviews and surveys will be analysed and interpreted to provide in-depth understanding of factors that influence engagement and stakeholder perspectives about use of the aggregated data and generated improvement strategies. Sources of data will be triangulated to build up a comprehensive, contextualised perspective and integrated understanding of the project's development, implementation and findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (Project 2015-2329), the Central Australian HREC (Project 15-288) and the Charles Darwin University HREC (Project H15030) approved the study. Dissemination will include articles in peer-reviewed journals, policy and research briefs. Results will be presented at conferences and quality improvement network meetings. Researchers, clinicians, policymakers and managers developing evidence-based system and policy interventions should benefit from this research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260892017-12-19 A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study Laycock, Alison Bailie, Jodie Matthews, Veronica Cunningham, Frances Harvey, Gillian Percival, Nikki Bailie, Ross BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Bringing together continuous quality improvement (CQI) data from multiple health services offers opportunities to identify common improvement priorities and to develop interventions at various system levels to achieve large-scale improvement in care. An important principle of CQI is practitioner participation in interpreting data and planning evidence-based change. This study will contribute knowledge about engaging diverse stakeholders in collaborative and theoretically informed processes to identify and address priority evidence-practice gaps in care delivery. This paper describes a developmental evaluation to support and refine a novel interactive dissemination project using aggregated CQI data from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary healthcare centres in Australia. The project aims to effect multilevel system improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be gathered using document analysis, online surveys, interviews with participants and iterative analytical processes with the research team. These methods will enable real-time feedback to guide refinements to the design, reports, tools and processes as the interactive dissemination project is implemented. Qualitative data from interviews and surveys will be analysed and interpreted to provide in-depth understanding of factors that influence engagement and stakeholder perspectives about use of the aggregated data and generated improvement strategies. Sources of data will be triangulated to build up a comprehensive, contextualised perspective and integrated understanding of the project's development, implementation and findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (Project 2015-2329), the Central Australian HREC (Project 15-288) and the Charles Darwin University HREC (Project H15030) approved the study. Dissemination will include articles in peer-reviewed journals, policy and research briefs. Results will be presented at conferences and quality improvement network meetings. Researchers, clinicians, policymakers and managers developing evidence-based system and policy interventions should benefit from this research. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5726089/ /pubmed/28710222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016341 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Laycock, Alison Bailie, Jodie Matthews, Veronica Cunningham, Frances Harvey, Gillian Percival, Nikki Bailie, Ross A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title | A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title_full | A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title_short | A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laycockalison adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT bailiejodie adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT matthewsveronica adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT cunninghamfrances adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT harveygillian adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT percivalnikki adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT bailieross adevelopmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT laycockalison developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT bailiejodie developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT matthewsveronica developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT cunninghamfrances developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT harveygillian developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT percivalnikki developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT bailieross developmentalevaluationtoenhancestakeholderengagementinawidescaleinteractiveprojectdisseminatingqualityimprovementdatastudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy |