Cargando…
Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study
OBJECTIVES: Explore the experience of patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. Use these experiential data to inform the development of a framework to support ongoing, meaningful patient engagement in ERAS. DESIGN: Qualitative patient-led stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017002 |
_version_ | 1783285670321586176 |
---|---|
author | Gillis, Chelsia Gill, Marlyn Marlett, Nancy MacKean, Gail GermAnn, Kathy Gilmour, Loreen Nelson, Gregg Wasylak, Tracy Nguyen, Susan Araujo, Edamil Zelinsky, Sandra Gramlich, Leah |
author_facet | Gillis, Chelsia Gill, Marlyn Marlett, Nancy MacKean, Gail GermAnn, Kathy Gilmour, Loreen Nelson, Gregg Wasylak, Tracy Nguyen, Susan Araujo, Edamil Zelinsky, Sandra Gramlich, Leah |
author_sort | Gillis, Chelsia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Explore the experience of patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. Use these experiential data to inform the development of a framework to support ongoing, meaningful patient engagement in ERAS. DESIGN: Qualitative patient-led study using focus groups and narrative interviews. Data were analysed iteratively using a Participatory Grounded Theory approach. SETTING: Five tertiary care centres in Alberta, Canada, following the ERAS programme. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients who had undergone colorectal surgery in the last 12 months were recruited through purposive sampling. Seven patients participated in a codesign focus group to set and prioritise the research direction. Narrative interviews were conducted with 20 patients. RESULTS: Patients perceived that an ERAS programme should not be limited to the perioperative period, but should encompass the journey from diagnosis to recovery. Practical recommendations to improve the patient experience across the surgical continuum, and enhance patient engagement within ERAS included: (1) fully explain every protocol, and the purpose of the protocol, both before surgery and while in-hospital, so that patients can become knowledgeable partners in their recovery; (2) extend ERAS guidelines to the presurgery phase, so that patients can be ready emotionally, psychologically and physically for surgery; (3) extend ERAS guidelines to the recovery period at home to avoid stressful situations for patients and families; (4) consider activating a programme where experienced patients can provide peer support; (5) one size does not fit all; personalised adaptations within the standardised pathway are required. Drawing upon these data, and through consultation with ERAS Alberta stakeholders, the ERAS team developed a matrix to guide sustained patient involvement and action throughout the surgical care continuum at three levels: individual, unit and ERAS system. CONCLUSION: This patient-led study generated new insights into the needs of ERAS patients and informed the development of a framework to improve patient experiences and outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5726093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57260932017-12-20 Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study Gillis, Chelsia Gill, Marlyn Marlett, Nancy MacKean, Gail GermAnn, Kathy Gilmour, Loreen Nelson, Gregg Wasylak, Tracy Nguyen, Susan Araujo, Edamil Zelinsky, Sandra Gramlich, Leah BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: Explore the experience of patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. Use these experiential data to inform the development of a framework to support ongoing, meaningful patient engagement in ERAS. DESIGN: Qualitative patient-led study using focus groups and narrative interviews. Data were analysed iteratively using a Participatory Grounded Theory approach. SETTING: Five tertiary care centres in Alberta, Canada, following the ERAS programme. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients who had undergone colorectal surgery in the last 12 months were recruited through purposive sampling. Seven patients participated in a codesign focus group to set and prioritise the research direction. Narrative interviews were conducted with 20 patients. RESULTS: Patients perceived that an ERAS programme should not be limited to the perioperative period, but should encompass the journey from diagnosis to recovery. Practical recommendations to improve the patient experience across the surgical continuum, and enhance patient engagement within ERAS included: (1) fully explain every protocol, and the purpose of the protocol, both before surgery and while in-hospital, so that patients can become knowledgeable partners in their recovery; (2) extend ERAS guidelines to the presurgery phase, so that patients can be ready emotionally, psychologically and physically for surgery; (3) extend ERAS guidelines to the recovery period at home to avoid stressful situations for patients and families; (4) consider activating a programme where experienced patients can provide peer support; (5) one size does not fit all; personalised adaptations within the standardised pathway are required. Drawing upon these data, and through consultation with ERAS Alberta stakeholders, the ERAS team developed a matrix to guide sustained patient involvement and action throughout the surgical care continuum at three levels: individual, unit and ERAS system. CONCLUSION: This patient-led study generated new insights into the needs of ERAS patients and informed the development of a framework to improve patient experiences and outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5726093/ /pubmed/28647727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017002 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Gillis, Chelsia Gill, Marlyn Marlett, Nancy MacKean, Gail GermAnn, Kathy Gilmour, Loreen Nelson, Gregg Wasylak, Tracy Nguyen, Susan Araujo, Edamil Zelinsky, Sandra Gramlich, Leah Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title | Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title_full | Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title_fullStr | Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title_short | Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study |
title_sort | patients as partners in enhanced recovery after surgery: a qualitative patient-led study |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillischelsia patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT gillmarlyn patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT marlettnancy patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT mackeangail patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT germannkathy patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT gilmourloreen patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT nelsongregg patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT wasylaktracy patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT nguyensusan patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT araujoedamil patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT zelinskysandra patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy AT gramlichleah patientsaspartnersinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryaqualitativepatientledstudy |