Cargando…

A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) has been used to report caesarean section rates, but analysis of other outcomes is also recommended. We now aim to present the TGCS as a method to assess outcomes of labour and delivery using routine collection of perinatal infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossen, Janne, Lucovnik, Miha, Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, Tul, Natasa, Murphy, Martina, Vistad, Ingvild, Robson, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192
_version_ 1783285674849337344
author Rossen, Janne
Lucovnik, Miha
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Tul, Natasa
Murphy, Martina
Vistad, Ingvild
Robson, Michael
author_facet Rossen, Janne
Lucovnik, Miha
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Tul, Natasa
Murphy, Martina
Vistad, Ingvild
Robson, Michael
author_sort Rossen, Janne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) has been used to report caesarean section rates, but analysis of other outcomes is also recommended. We now aim to present the TGCS as a method to assess outcomes of labour and delivery using routine collection of perinatal information. DESIGN: This research is a methodological study to describe the use of the TGCS. SETTING: Stavanger University Hospital (SUH), Norway, National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and Slovenian National Perinatal Database (SLO), Slovenia. PARTICIPANTS: 9848 women from SUH, Norway, 9250 women from National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and 106 167 women, from SLO, Slovenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All women were classified according to the TGCS within which caesarean section, oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia, operative vaginal deliveries, episiotomy, sphincter rupture, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, maternal age >35 years, body mass index >30, Apgar score, umbilical cord pH, hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy, antepartum and perinatal deaths were incorporated. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the sizes of the groups of women and the incidences of events and outcomes within the TGCS between the three perinatal databases. CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS is a standardised objective classification system where events and outcomes of labour and delivery can be incorporated. Obstetric core events and outcomes should be agreed and defined to set standards of care. This method provides continuous and available observations from delivery wards, possibly used for further interpretation, questions and international comparisons. The definition of quality may vary in different units and can only be ascertained when all the necessary information is available and considered together.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57261122017-12-19 A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study Rossen, Janne Lucovnik, Miha Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe Tul, Natasa Murphy, Martina Vistad, Ingvild Robson, Michael BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) has been used to report caesarean section rates, but analysis of other outcomes is also recommended. We now aim to present the TGCS as a method to assess outcomes of labour and delivery using routine collection of perinatal information. DESIGN: This research is a methodological study to describe the use of the TGCS. SETTING: Stavanger University Hospital (SUH), Norway, National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and Slovenian National Perinatal Database (SLO), Slovenia. PARTICIPANTS: 9848 women from SUH, Norway, 9250 women from National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and 106 167 women, from SLO, Slovenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All women were classified according to the TGCS within which caesarean section, oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia, operative vaginal deliveries, episiotomy, sphincter rupture, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, maternal age >35 years, body mass index >30, Apgar score, umbilical cord pH, hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy, antepartum and perinatal deaths were incorporated. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the sizes of the groups of women and the incidences of events and outcomes within the TGCS between the three perinatal databases. CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS is a standardised objective classification system where events and outcomes of labour and delivery can be incorporated. Obstetric core events and outcomes should be agreed and defined to set standards of care. This method provides continuous and available observations from delivery wards, possibly used for further interpretation, questions and international comparisons. The definition of quality may vary in different units and can only be ascertained when all the necessary information is available and considered together. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5726112/ /pubmed/28706102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Rossen, Janne
Lucovnik, Miha
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Tul, Natasa
Murphy, Martina
Vistad, Ingvild
Robson, Michael
A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title_full A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title_fullStr A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title_short A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study
title_sort method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-group classification system: a quantitative descriptive study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192
work_keys_str_mv AT rossenjanne amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT lucovnikmiha amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT eggebøtorbjørnmoe amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT tulnatasa amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT murphymartina amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT vistadingvild amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT robsonmichael amethodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT rossenjanne methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT lucovnikmiha methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT eggebøtorbjørnmoe methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT tulnatasa methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT murphymartina methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT vistadingvild methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy
AT robsonmichael methodtoassessobstetricoutcomesusingthe10groupclassificationsystemaquantitativedescriptivestudy