Cargando…
Comparison between TG‐51 and TG‐21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers
A new calibration protocol, developed by the AAPM Task Group 51 (TG‐51) to replace the TG‐21 protocol, is based on an absorbed‐dose to water standard and calibration factor [Formula: see text] , while the TG‐21 protocol is based on an exposure (or air‐kerma) standard and calibration factor [Formula:...
Autores principales: | Cho, S. H., Lowenstein, J. R., Balter, P. A., Wells, N. H., Hanson, W. F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v1i3.2643 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS‐398 and AAPM TG‐51.
por: Castrillón, Silvia Vargas, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Validating k(Q)=1.0 assumption in TG51 with PTW 30013 farmer chamber for Varian TrueBeam's 2.5 MV imaging beam
por: Grzetic, Shelby, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Cylindrical coordinate‐based TG‐43U1 parameters for dose calculation around elongated brachytherapy sources
por: Awan, Shahid B., et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG‐21 protocol: Another reason to switch to TG‐51
por: Followill, David S., et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Characterization of cylindrical ionization chambers for patient specific IMRT QA
por: Fraser, Danielle, et al.
Publicado: (2009)