Cargando…

Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between degree of retinal abnormalities and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients with a small amount of refractive error. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 49 eyes (37 patients) of idiopathic ERM patients. We invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jang Hoon, Park, Sung Pyo, Kim, Yong-Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29022293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0021
_version_ 1783285778486394880
author Lee, Jang Hoon
Park, Sung Pyo
Kim, Yong-Kyu
author_facet Lee, Jang Hoon
Park, Sung Pyo
Kim, Yong-Kyu
author_sort Lee, Jang Hoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between degree of retinal abnormalities and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients with a small amount of refractive error. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 49 eyes (37 patients) of idiopathic ERM patients. We investigated the association between visual acuity and macular status (central macular thickness [CMT], outer retinal integrity score, and inner retinal irregularity index) that was assessed by optical coherence tomography using multiple linear regression analysis. We defined visual acuity difference (VAD) as the difference between UCVA and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We divided patients into two groups according to VAD size and compared clinical characteristics between the two groups. We also investigated factors associated with VAD using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: BCVA showed significant association with CMT and outer retinal integrity score, while UCVA showed significant association with CMT and inner retinal irregularity index. Patients with a large VAD showed a similar level of BCVA compared to the small VAD group (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], large VAD group 0.11 ± 0.11 vs. small VAD group 0.13 ± 0.12, p = 0.585). However, UCVA was worse (logMAR, large VAD group 0.44 ± 0.14 vs. small VAD group 0.18 ± 0.14, p < 0.001) and inner retinal irregularity was higher (large VAD group 1.06 ± 0.04 vs. small VAD group 1.04 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) in patients with a large VAD. On multiple linear regression analysis, the absolute value of spherical equivalent (standardized coefficient β 0.521, p < 0.001) and inner retinal irregularity index (standardized coefficient β 0.448, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with VAD. CONCLUSIONS: UCVA was associated with inner retinal irregularity in idiopathic ERM patients with a mild degree of refractive error. Inner retinal irregularity was also associated with degree of VAD, suggesting that the effect of refractive error correction is greater in patients with more distorted retina.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5726985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57269852017-12-13 Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients Lee, Jang Hoon Park, Sung Pyo Kim, Yong-Kyu Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between degree of retinal abnormalities and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients with a small amount of refractive error. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 49 eyes (37 patients) of idiopathic ERM patients. We investigated the association between visual acuity and macular status (central macular thickness [CMT], outer retinal integrity score, and inner retinal irregularity index) that was assessed by optical coherence tomography using multiple linear regression analysis. We defined visual acuity difference (VAD) as the difference between UCVA and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We divided patients into two groups according to VAD size and compared clinical characteristics between the two groups. We also investigated factors associated with VAD using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: BCVA showed significant association with CMT and outer retinal integrity score, while UCVA showed significant association with CMT and inner retinal irregularity index. Patients with a large VAD showed a similar level of BCVA compared to the small VAD group (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], large VAD group 0.11 ± 0.11 vs. small VAD group 0.13 ± 0.12, p = 0.585). However, UCVA was worse (logMAR, large VAD group 0.44 ± 0.14 vs. small VAD group 0.18 ± 0.14, p < 0.001) and inner retinal irregularity was higher (large VAD group 1.06 ± 0.04 vs. small VAD group 1.04 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) in patients with a large VAD. On multiple linear regression analysis, the absolute value of spherical equivalent (standardized coefficient β 0.521, p < 0.001) and inner retinal irregularity index (standardized coefficient β 0.448, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with VAD. CONCLUSIONS: UCVA was associated with inner retinal irregularity in idiopathic ERM patients with a mild degree of refractive error. Inner retinal irregularity was also associated with degree of VAD, suggesting that the effect of refractive error correction is greater in patients with more distorted retina. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017-12 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5726985/ /pubmed/29022293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0021 Text en © 2017 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jang Hoon
Park, Sung Pyo
Kim, Yong-Kyu
Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title_full Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title_fullStr Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title_short Correlation between Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Macular Distortion in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Patients
title_sort correlation between uncorrected visual acuity and macular distortion in idiopathic epiretinal membrane patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29022293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0021
work_keys_str_mv AT leejanghoon correlationbetweenuncorrectedvisualacuityandmaculardistortioninidiopathicepiretinalmembranepatients
AT parksungpyo correlationbetweenuncorrectedvisualacuityandmaculardistortioninidiopathicepiretinalmembranepatients
AT kimyongkyu correlationbetweenuncorrectedvisualacuityandmaculardistortioninidiopathicepiretinalmembranepatients