Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs

Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Gurmanik, Arora, Ajat Shatru, Jain, Vijender Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904
_version_ 1783285961704079360
author Kaur, Gurmanik
Arora, Ajat Shatru
Jain, Vijender Kumar
author_facet Kaur, Gurmanik
Arora, Ajat Shatru
Jain, Vijender Kumar
author_sort Kaur, Gurmanik
collection PubMed
description Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work described the use of principal component analysis- (PCA-) fused forward stepwise regression (FSWR), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) models for prediction of BP reactivity to crossed legs among the normotensive and hypertensive participants. The evaluation of the performance of the proposed prediction models using appropriate statistical indices showed that the PCA-based LS-SVM (PCA-LS-SVM) model has the highest prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 93.16%, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.27, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 5.71 for SBP prediction in normotensive subjects. Furthermore, R(2) = 96.46%, RMSE = 0.19, and MAPE = 1.76 for SBP prediction and R(2) = 95.44%, RMSE = 0.21, and MAPE = 2.78 for DBP prediction in hypertensive subjects using the PCA-LSSVM model. This assessment presents the importance and advantages posed by hybrid computing models for the prediction of variables in biomedical research studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5727829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57278292018-01-09 Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs Kaur, Gurmanik Arora, Ajat Shatru Jain, Vijender Kumar J Healthc Eng Research Article Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work described the use of principal component analysis- (PCA-) fused forward stepwise regression (FSWR), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) models for prediction of BP reactivity to crossed legs among the normotensive and hypertensive participants. The evaluation of the performance of the proposed prediction models using appropriate statistical indices showed that the PCA-based LS-SVM (PCA-LS-SVM) model has the highest prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 93.16%, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.27, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 5.71 for SBP prediction in normotensive subjects. Furthermore, R(2) = 96.46%, RMSE = 0.19, and MAPE = 1.76 for SBP prediction and R(2) = 95.44%, RMSE = 0.21, and MAPE = 2.78 for DBP prediction in hypertensive subjects using the PCA-LSSVM model. This assessment presents the importance and advantages posed by hybrid computing models for the prediction of variables in biomedical research studies. Hindawi 2017 2017-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5727829/ /pubmed/29317994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904 Text en Copyright © 2017 Gurmanik Kaur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaur, Gurmanik
Arora, Ajat Shatru
Jain, Vijender Kumar
Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title_full Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title_short Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
title_sort comparative analysis of hybrid models for prediction of bp reactivity to crossed legs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurgurmanik comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs
AT aroraajatshatru comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs
AT jainvijenderkumar comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs