Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs
Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work d...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904 |
_version_ | 1783285961704079360 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Gurmanik Arora, Ajat Shatru Jain, Vijender Kumar |
author_facet | Kaur, Gurmanik Arora, Ajat Shatru Jain, Vijender Kumar |
author_sort | Kaur, Gurmanik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work described the use of principal component analysis- (PCA-) fused forward stepwise regression (FSWR), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) models for prediction of BP reactivity to crossed legs among the normotensive and hypertensive participants. The evaluation of the performance of the proposed prediction models using appropriate statistical indices showed that the PCA-based LS-SVM (PCA-LS-SVM) model has the highest prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 93.16%, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.27, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 5.71 for SBP prediction in normotensive subjects. Furthermore, R(2) = 96.46%, RMSE = 0.19, and MAPE = 1.76 for SBP prediction and R(2) = 95.44%, RMSE = 0.21, and MAPE = 2.78 for DBP prediction in hypertensive subjects using the PCA-LSSVM model. This assessment presents the importance and advantages posed by hybrid computing models for the prediction of variables in biomedical research studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5727829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57278292018-01-09 Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs Kaur, Gurmanik Arora, Ajat Shatru Jain, Vijender Kumar J Healthc Eng Research Article Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work described the use of principal component analysis- (PCA-) fused forward stepwise regression (FSWR), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) models for prediction of BP reactivity to crossed legs among the normotensive and hypertensive participants. The evaluation of the performance of the proposed prediction models using appropriate statistical indices showed that the PCA-based LS-SVM (PCA-LS-SVM) model has the highest prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 93.16%, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.27, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 5.71 for SBP prediction in normotensive subjects. Furthermore, R(2) = 96.46%, RMSE = 0.19, and MAPE = 1.76 for SBP prediction and R(2) = 95.44%, RMSE = 0.21, and MAPE = 2.78 for DBP prediction in hypertensive subjects using the PCA-LSSVM model. This assessment presents the importance and advantages posed by hybrid computing models for the prediction of variables in biomedical research studies. Hindawi 2017 2017-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5727829/ /pubmed/29317994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904 Text en Copyright © 2017 Gurmanik Kaur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaur, Gurmanik Arora, Ajat Shatru Jain, Vijender Kumar Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title | Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs |
title_sort | comparative analysis of hybrid models for prediction of bp reactivity to crossed legs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2187904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaurgurmanik comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs AT aroraajatshatru comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs AT jainvijenderkumar comparativeanalysisofhybridmodelsforpredictionofbpreactivitytocrossedlegs |