Cargando…
Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4 |
_version_ | 1783285969678499840 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Il-Gyu Kim, Sung-Eun Chang, Bok Soon Kwak, Min Seob Yoon, Jin Young Cha, Jae Myung Shin, Hyun Phil Lee, Joung Il Kim, Sang Hyun Han, Jin Hee Jeon, Jung Won |
author_facet | Ko, Il-Gyu Kim, Sung-Eun Chang, Bok Soon Kwak, Min Seob Yoon, Jin Young Cha, Jae Myung Shin, Hyun Phil Lee, Joung Il Kim, Sang Hyun Han, Jin Hee Jeon, Jung Won |
author_sort | Ko, Il-Gyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. METHODS: Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. RESULTS: In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5727876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57278762017-12-18 Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding Ko, Il-Gyu Kim, Sung-Eun Chang, Bok Soon Kwak, Min Seob Yoon, Jin Young Cha, Jae Myung Shin, Hyun Phil Lee, Joung Il Kim, Sang Hyun Han, Jin Hee Jeon, Jung Won BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. METHODS: Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. RESULTS: In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results. BioMed Central 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5727876/ /pubmed/29233096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ko, Il-Gyu Kim, Sung-Eun Chang, Bok Soon Kwak, Min Seob Yoon, Jin Young Cha, Jae Myung Shin, Hyun Phil Lee, Joung Il Kim, Sang Hyun Han, Jin Hee Jeon, Jung Won Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title | Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_full | Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_short | Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_sort | evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koilgyu evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT kimsungeun evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT changboksoon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT kwakminseob evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT yoonjinyoung evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT chajaemyung evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT shinhyunphil evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT leejoungil evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT kimsanghyun evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT hanjinhee evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding AT jeonjungwon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding |