Cargando…

Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Il-Gyu, Kim, Sung-Eun, Chang, Bok Soon, Kwak, Min Seob, Yoon, Jin Young, Cha, Jae Myung, Shin, Hyun Phil, Lee, Joung Il, Kim, Sang Hyun, Han, Jin Hee, Jeon, Jung Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4
_version_ 1783285969678499840
author Ko, Il-Gyu
Kim, Sung-Eun
Chang, Bok Soon
Kwak, Min Seob
Yoon, Jin Young
Cha, Jae Myung
Shin, Hyun Phil
Lee, Joung Il
Kim, Sang Hyun
Han, Jin Hee
Jeon, Jung Won
author_facet Ko, Il-Gyu
Kim, Sung-Eun
Chang, Bok Soon
Kwak, Min Seob
Yoon, Jin Young
Cha, Jae Myung
Shin, Hyun Phil
Lee, Joung Il
Kim, Sang Hyun
Han, Jin Hee
Jeon, Jung Won
author_sort Ko, Il-Gyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. METHODS: Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. RESULTS: In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5727876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57278762017-12-18 Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding Ko, Il-Gyu Kim, Sung-Eun Chang, Bok Soon Kwak, Min Seob Yoon, Jin Young Cha, Jae Myung Shin, Hyun Phil Lee, Joung Il Kim, Sang Hyun Han, Jin Hee Jeon, Jung Won BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. METHODS: Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. RESULTS: In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results. BioMed Central 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5727876/ /pubmed/29233096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ko, Il-Gyu
Kim, Sung-Eun
Chang, Bok Soon
Kwak, Min Seob
Yoon, Jin Young
Cha, Jae Myung
Shin, Hyun Phil
Lee, Joung Il
Kim, Sang Hyun
Han, Jin Hee
Jeon, Jung Won
Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4
work_keys_str_mv AT koilgyu evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT kimsungeun evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT changboksoon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT kwakminseob evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT yoonjinyoung evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT chajaemyung evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT shinhyunphil evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT leejoungil evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT kimsanghyun evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT hanjinhee evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT jeonjungwon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding