Cargando…

Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments

The ratio of index finger length to ring finger length (2D:4D) is considered to be a putative biomarker of prenatal androgen exposure (PAE), with previous research suggesting that 2D:4D is associated with human behaviors, especially sex-typical behaviors. This study empirically examines the relation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bönte, Werner, Procher, Vivien D., Urbig, Diemo, Voracek, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00238
_version_ 1783286004966227968
author Bönte, Werner
Procher, Vivien D.
Urbig, Diemo
Voracek, Martin
author_facet Bönte, Werner
Procher, Vivien D.
Urbig, Diemo
Voracek, Martin
author_sort Bönte, Werner
collection PubMed
description The ratio of index finger length to ring finger length (2D:4D) is considered to be a putative biomarker of prenatal androgen exposure (PAE), with previous research suggesting that 2D:4D is associated with human behaviors, especially sex-typical behaviors. This study empirically examines the relationship between 2D:4D and individual competitiveness, a behavioral trait that is found to be sexually dimorphic. We employ two related, but distinct, measures of competitiveness, namely behavioral measures obtained from economic experiments and psychometric self-reported measures. Our analyses are based on two independent data sets obtained from surveys and economic experiments with 461 visitors of a shopping mall (Study I) and 617 university students (Study II). The correlation between behavior in the economic experiment and digit ratios of both hands is not statistically significant in either study. In contrast, we find a negative and statistically significant relationship between psychometric self-reported measures of competitiveness and right hand digit ratios (R2D:4D) in both studies. This relationship is especially strong for younger people. Hence, this study provides some robust empirical evidence for a negative association between R2D:4D and self-reported competitiveness. We discuss potential reasons why digit ratio may relate differently to behaviors in specific economics experiments and to self-reported general competitiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57280702017-12-22 Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments Bönte, Werner Procher, Vivien D. Urbig, Diemo Voracek, Martin Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The ratio of index finger length to ring finger length (2D:4D) is considered to be a putative biomarker of prenatal androgen exposure (PAE), with previous research suggesting that 2D:4D is associated with human behaviors, especially sex-typical behaviors. This study empirically examines the relationship between 2D:4D and individual competitiveness, a behavioral trait that is found to be sexually dimorphic. We employ two related, but distinct, measures of competitiveness, namely behavioral measures obtained from economic experiments and psychometric self-reported measures. Our analyses are based on two independent data sets obtained from surveys and economic experiments with 461 visitors of a shopping mall (Study I) and 617 university students (Study II). The correlation between behavior in the economic experiment and digit ratios of both hands is not statistically significant in either study. In contrast, we find a negative and statistically significant relationship between psychometric self-reported measures of competitiveness and right hand digit ratios (R2D:4D) in both studies. This relationship is especially strong for younger people. Hence, this study provides some robust empirical evidence for a negative association between R2D:4D and self-reported competitiveness. We discuss potential reasons why digit ratio may relate differently to behaviors in specific economics experiments and to self-reported general competitiveness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5728070/ /pubmed/29276479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00238 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bönte, Procher, Urbig and Voracek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bönte, Werner
Procher, Vivien D.
Urbig, Diemo
Voracek, Martin
Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title_full Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title_fullStr Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title_short Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments
title_sort digit ratio (2d:4d) predicts self-reported measures of general competitiveness, but not behavior in economic experiments
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00238
work_keys_str_mv AT bontewerner digitratio2d4dpredictsselfreportedmeasuresofgeneralcompetitivenessbutnotbehaviorineconomicexperiments
AT procherviviend digitratio2d4dpredictsselfreportedmeasuresofgeneralcompetitivenessbutnotbehaviorineconomicexperiments
AT urbigdiemo digitratio2d4dpredictsselfreportedmeasuresofgeneralcompetitivenessbutnotbehaviorineconomicexperiments
AT voracekmartin digitratio2d4dpredictsselfreportedmeasuresofgeneralcompetitivenessbutnotbehaviorineconomicexperiments