Cargando…

Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies

OBJECTIVES: To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Jennifer E, Wilenzick, Marc, Ritcey, Nolan, Ross, Joseph S, Mello, Michelle M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917
_version_ 1783286014295408640
author Miller, Jennifer E
Wilenzick, Marc
Ritcey, Nolan
Ross, Joseph S
Mello, Michelle M
author_facet Miller, Jennifer E
Wilenzick, Marc
Ritcey, Nolan
Ross, Joseph S
Mello, Michelle M
author_sort Miller, Jennifer E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies. DATA SOURCES: Data from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Trial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level. RESULTS: The FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%–100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%–100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%–100%) were published and 96% (80%–100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%–100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials.gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries. CONCLUSIONS: Among large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies’ transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57282662017-12-19 Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies Miller, Jennifer E Wilenzick, Marc Ritcey, Nolan Ross, Joseph S Mello, Michelle M BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: To define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies. DATA SOURCES: Data from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Trial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level. RESULTS: The FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%–100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%–100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%–100%) were published and 96% (80%–100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%–100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials.gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries. CONCLUSIONS: Among large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies’ transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5728266/ /pubmed/29208616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ethics
Miller, Jennifer E
Wilenzick, Marc
Ritcey, Nolan
Ross, Joseph S
Mello, Michelle M
Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title_full Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title_fullStr Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title_full_unstemmed Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title_short Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
title_sort measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917
work_keys_str_mv AT millerjennifere measuringclinicaltrialtransparencyanempiricalanalysisofnewlyapproveddrugsandlargepharmaceuticalcompanies
AT wilenzickmarc measuringclinicaltrialtransparencyanempiricalanalysisofnewlyapproveddrugsandlargepharmaceuticalcompanies
AT ritceynolan measuringclinicaltrialtransparencyanempiricalanalysisofnewlyapproveddrugsandlargepharmaceuticalcompanies
AT rossjosephs measuringclinicaltrialtransparencyanempiricalanalysisofnewlyapproveddrugsandlargepharmaceuticalcompanies
AT mellomichellem measuringclinicaltrialtransparencyanempiricalanalysisofnewlyapproveddrugsandlargepharmaceuticalcompanies