Cargando…

Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reder, Maren, Kolip, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29236722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148
_version_ 1783286037150171136
author Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
author_facet Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
author_sort Reder, Maren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation. METHODS: A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme’s invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ(2)-tests. RESULTS: 1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention. CONCLUSION: This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57285142017-12-22 Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation. METHODS: A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme’s invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ(2)-tests. RESULTS: 1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention. CONCLUSION: This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176. Public Library of Science 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5728514/ /pubmed/29236722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148 Text en © 2017 Reder, Kolip http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title_full Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title_short Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
title_sort does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? results from a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29236722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148
work_keys_str_mv AT redermaren doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kolippetra doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial