Cargando…
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29236722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148 |
_version_ | 1783286037150171136 |
---|---|
author | Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra |
author_facet | Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra |
author_sort | Reder, Maren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation. METHODS: A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme’s invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ(2)-tests. RESULTS: 1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention. CONCLUSION: This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5728514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57285142017-12-22 Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation. METHODS: A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme’s invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ(2)-tests. RESULTS: 1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention. CONCLUSION: This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176. Public Library of Science 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5728514/ /pubmed/29236722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148 Text en © 2017 Reder, Kolip http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title | Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? results from a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29236722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redermaren doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kolippetra doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial |