Cargando…

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors, reviewers and publishers has been undertaken. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, conducted for the OpenAIRE202...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Deppe, Arvid, Schmidt, Birgit
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29236721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Ejemplares similares

Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What is open peer review? A systematic review
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony
Publicado: (2017)

Guidelines for open peer review implementation
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The limitations to our understanding of peer review
por: Tennant, Jonathan P., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Ethics and Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers to the Authors, Readers, and Editors
por: Min, Seung-Kee
Publicado: (2021)

Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
por: Klebel, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor
por: Leung, Tiffany I, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Symbiotic Relationship between Authors, Medical Journals, Editors and the Peer Review System
por: Santini, Ario, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
por: D’Andrea, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Training and Experience of Peer Reviewers: Authors' Reply
por: Callaham, Michael
Publicado: (2007)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2017)

Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers
por: Cole, Nicki Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
por: Besançon, Lonni, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor
por: Agathokleous, Evgenios
Publicado: (2021)

From the Editor: Preprint or Not—The Role of Peer Review
por: Prucha, Thomas
Publicado: (2021)

Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The role of author identities in peer review
por: Shah, Nihar B.
Publicado: (2023)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Strategic priorities for reproducibility reform
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony
Publicado: (2023)

Peer Review, Confidential Comments to the Editor, and the Golden Rule
por: Swanson, Eric
Publicado: (2023)

The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process
por: Giordan, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer reviewers for JACEP Open
Publicado: (2020)

A community experiment with fully open and published peer review
por: Koonin, Eugene V, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

The experiences, attitudes and understanding of research amongst medical students at an Australian medical school
por: Muhandiramge, Jaidyn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Open access, open data and peer review
por: Ule, Jernej
Publicado: (2020)

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
por: Kowalczuk, Maria K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Peer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer’s opinion?
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors
por: O’Brien, Bridget C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science
por: Shanahan, Daniel R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

An Open Science Peer Review Oath
por: Aleksic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Open peer review: pros and cons
por: Sardanelli, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective
por: Huisman, Janine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Preprints versus peer-reviewed articles – Author's reply
por: Hutchins, B Ian
Publicado: (2023)

Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
por: Huber, Jürgen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_b1m8a45mrfepl7so6u4ulionra