Cargando…

Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections

BACKGROUND: The protective role (decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury) of ischemic preconditioning (IP) before continuous vascular occlusion in liver resection is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the advantages and any potential disadvantages of IP maneuver. METHODS: A systematic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xingjun, Liu, Gongpan, Zhang, Xiaobin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008217
_version_ 1783286059883298816
author Guo, Xingjun
Liu, Gongpan
Zhang, Xiaobin
author_facet Guo, Xingjun
Liu, Gongpan
Zhang, Xiaobin
author_sort Guo, Xingjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The protective role (decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury) of ischemic preconditioning (IP) before continuous vascular occlusion in liver resection is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the advantages and any potential disadvantages of IP maneuver. METHODS: A systematic search in the Embase, Medline, PubMed databases, and the Cochrane Library was performed using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, mortality, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and total bilirubin (TB) level. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using either the random effects model or fixed effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs involving 918 patients were analyzed to achieve a summated outcome. The patients have been divided into IP group (n = 455) and no IP group (n = 463) before continuous vascular occlusion. No significant difference was found in postoperative mortality between both groups (P = .30). Subgroup analysis revealed that the postoperative morbidity in the cirrhosis subgroup was significantly less for the IP group compared with the control group (P = .01). In the cirrhosis subgroup, the result was stable (P = .04), without heterogeneity (P = .59; I(2) = 0%). Meta-analysis of AST level on postoperative day (POD) 1 indicated lower postoperative AST level in the IP group (P = .04). The analysis of ALT level showed lower ALT level in the IP group versus control group (P = .02). However, there was no difference in postoperative AST and ALT level after excluding 1 study with statistical heterogeneity (all P > .05). With respect to postoperative TB level, there was no significant difference between 2 groups. CONCLUSION: IP cannot decrease the hospital mortality for patients undergoing hepatectomy. IP may be beneficial for patients with cirrhosis due to less morbidity in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, we cannot conclude that IP can decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury because it did not significantly decrease postoperative AST, ALT, and TB levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57287262017-12-20 Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections Guo, Xingjun Liu, Gongpan Zhang, Xiaobin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: The protective role (decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury) of ischemic preconditioning (IP) before continuous vascular occlusion in liver resection is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the advantages and any potential disadvantages of IP maneuver. METHODS: A systematic search in the Embase, Medline, PubMed databases, and the Cochrane Library was performed using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, mortality, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and total bilirubin (TB) level. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using either the random effects model or fixed effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs involving 918 patients were analyzed to achieve a summated outcome. The patients have been divided into IP group (n = 455) and no IP group (n = 463) before continuous vascular occlusion. No significant difference was found in postoperative mortality between both groups (P = .30). Subgroup analysis revealed that the postoperative morbidity in the cirrhosis subgroup was significantly less for the IP group compared with the control group (P = .01). In the cirrhosis subgroup, the result was stable (P = .04), without heterogeneity (P = .59; I(2) = 0%). Meta-analysis of AST level on postoperative day (POD) 1 indicated lower postoperative AST level in the IP group (P = .04). The analysis of ALT level showed lower ALT level in the IP group versus control group (P = .02). However, there was no difference in postoperative AST and ALT level after excluding 1 study with statistical heterogeneity (all P > .05). With respect to postoperative TB level, there was no significant difference between 2 groups. CONCLUSION: IP cannot decrease the hospital mortality for patients undergoing hepatectomy. IP may be beneficial for patients with cirrhosis due to less morbidity in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, we cannot conclude that IP can decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury because it did not significantly decrease postoperative AST, ALT, and TB levels. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5728726/ /pubmed/29310325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008217 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Guo, Xingjun
Liu, Gongpan
Zhang, Xiaobin
Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title_full Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title_short Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
title_sort meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (ip) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008217
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxingjun metaanalysisofischemicpreconditioningiponpostoperativeoutcomesafterliverresections
AT liugongpan metaanalysisofischemicpreconditioningiponpostoperativeoutcomesafterliverresections
AT zhangxiaobin metaanalysisofischemicpreconditioningiponpostoperativeoutcomesafterliverresections