Cargando…

The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy

To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hannan, Enda J., O’Leary, Donal P., MacNally, Stephen P., Kay, Elaine W., Farrell, Michael A., Morris, Patrick G., Power, Colm P., Hill, Arnold D.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404
_version_ 1783286060586893312
author Hannan, Enda J.
O’Leary, Donal P.
MacNally, Stephen P.
Kay, Elaine W.
Farrell, Michael A.
Morris, Patrick G.
Power, Colm P.
Hill, Arnold D.K.
author_facet Hannan, Enda J.
O’Leary, Donal P.
MacNally, Stephen P.
Kay, Elaine W.
Farrell, Michael A.
Morris, Patrick G.
Power, Colm P.
Hill, Arnold D.K.
author_sort Hannan, Enda J.
collection PubMed
description To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF mutations, BRAF V600E being most common. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has shown improvement in outcome in patients with melanoma. It has been demonstrated that not all metastatic lesions carry the same BRAF mutation status as the primary, but the frequency in which discordance occurs remains unclear. Establishing this may have implications in the use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Patients who underwent metastectomy for melanoma brain metastases were identified using our local histopathology database. A review of histology of the primary lesion and the metastasis was performed for each patient, assessing for BRAF mutation status discordance. Fourty-two patients who underwent a brain metastectomy following excision of a melanoma primary were identified over a 7-year period. Median survival was 9 months. The median Breslow thickness for the primary lesion was 3.4 mm. Six patients (14%) had discrepancy between the BRAF status of a melanoma primary and metastatic lesion. Of these 6 patients, 3 had a BRAF mutation positive primary with a BRAF mutation negative metastatic lesion, while the other 3 had a BRAF mutation negative primary with BRAF mutation positive metastasis. There is an important discordance rate in the BRAF mutation status of melanoma primaries versus brain metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57287292017-12-20 The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy Hannan, Enda J. O’Leary, Donal P. MacNally, Stephen P. Kay, Elaine W. Farrell, Michael A. Morris, Patrick G. Power, Colm P. Hill, Arnold D.K. Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF mutations, BRAF V600E being most common. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has shown improvement in outcome in patients with melanoma. It has been demonstrated that not all metastatic lesions carry the same BRAF mutation status as the primary, but the frequency in which discordance occurs remains unclear. Establishing this may have implications in the use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Patients who underwent metastectomy for melanoma brain metastases were identified using our local histopathology database. A review of histology of the primary lesion and the metastasis was performed for each patient, assessing for BRAF mutation status discordance. Fourty-two patients who underwent a brain metastectomy following excision of a melanoma primary were identified over a 7-year period. Median survival was 9 months. The median Breslow thickness for the primary lesion was 3.4 mm. Six patients (14%) had discrepancy between the BRAF status of a melanoma primary and metastatic lesion. Of these 6 patients, 3 had a BRAF mutation positive primary with a BRAF mutation negative metastatic lesion, while the other 3 had a BRAF mutation negative primary with BRAF mutation positive metastasis. There is an important discordance rate in the BRAF mutation status of melanoma primaries versus brain metastases. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5728729/ /pubmed/29310328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Hannan, Enda J.
O’Leary, Donal P.
MacNally, Stephen P.
Kay, Elaine W.
Farrell, Michael A.
Morris, Patrick G.
Power, Colm P.
Hill, Arnold D.K.
The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title_full The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title_fullStr The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title_full_unstemmed The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title_short The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
title_sort significance of braf v600e mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: the implications for braf inhibitor therapy
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404
work_keys_str_mv AT hannanendaj thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT olearydonalp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT macnallystephenp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT kayelainew thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT farrellmichaela thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT morrispatrickg thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT powercolmp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT hillarnolddk thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT hannanendaj significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT olearydonalp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT macnallystephenp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT kayelainew significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT farrellmichaela significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT morrispatrickg significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT powercolmp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy
AT hillarnolddk significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy