Cargando…
The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy
To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404 |
_version_ | 1783286060586893312 |
---|---|
author | Hannan, Enda J. O’Leary, Donal P. MacNally, Stephen P. Kay, Elaine W. Farrell, Michael A. Morris, Patrick G. Power, Colm P. Hill, Arnold D.K. |
author_facet | Hannan, Enda J. O’Leary, Donal P. MacNally, Stephen P. Kay, Elaine W. Farrell, Michael A. Morris, Patrick G. Power, Colm P. Hill, Arnold D.K. |
author_sort | Hannan, Enda J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF mutations, BRAF V600E being most common. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has shown improvement in outcome in patients with melanoma. It has been demonstrated that not all metastatic lesions carry the same BRAF mutation status as the primary, but the frequency in which discordance occurs remains unclear. Establishing this may have implications in the use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Patients who underwent metastectomy for melanoma brain metastases were identified using our local histopathology database. A review of histology of the primary lesion and the metastasis was performed for each patient, assessing for BRAF mutation status discordance. Fourty-two patients who underwent a brain metastectomy following excision of a melanoma primary were identified over a 7-year period. Median survival was 9 months. The median Breslow thickness for the primary lesion was 3.4 mm. Six patients (14%) had discrepancy between the BRAF status of a melanoma primary and metastatic lesion. Of these 6 patients, 3 had a BRAF mutation positive primary with a BRAF mutation negative metastatic lesion, while the other 3 had a BRAF mutation negative primary with BRAF mutation positive metastasis. There is an important discordance rate in the BRAF mutation status of melanoma primaries versus brain metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5728729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57287292017-12-20 The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy Hannan, Enda J. O’Leary, Donal P. MacNally, Stephen P. Kay, Elaine W. Farrell, Michael A. Morris, Patrick G. Power, Colm P. Hill, Arnold D.K. Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 To compare BRAF V600E status of primary melanoma and brain metastases to assess for discordance by cross-sectional study, and to evaluate clinical implications on BRAF inhibitor therapy. Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas demonstrate BRAF mutations, BRAF V600E being most common. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has shown improvement in outcome in patients with melanoma. It has been demonstrated that not all metastatic lesions carry the same BRAF mutation status as the primary, but the frequency in which discordance occurs remains unclear. Establishing this may have implications in the use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Patients who underwent metastectomy for melanoma brain metastases were identified using our local histopathology database. A review of histology of the primary lesion and the metastasis was performed for each patient, assessing for BRAF mutation status discordance. Fourty-two patients who underwent a brain metastectomy following excision of a melanoma primary were identified over a 7-year period. Median survival was 9 months. The median Breslow thickness for the primary lesion was 3.4 mm. Six patients (14%) had discrepancy between the BRAF status of a melanoma primary and metastatic lesion. Of these 6 patients, 3 had a BRAF mutation positive primary with a BRAF mutation negative metastatic lesion, while the other 3 had a BRAF mutation negative primary with BRAF mutation positive metastasis. There is an important discordance rate in the BRAF mutation status of melanoma primaries versus brain metastases. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5728729/ /pubmed/29310328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Hannan, Enda J. O’Leary, Donal P. MacNally, Stephen P. Kay, Elaine W. Farrell, Michael A. Morris, Patrick G. Power, Colm P. Hill, Arnold D.K. The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title | The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title_full | The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title_fullStr | The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title_short | The significance of BRAF V600E mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: The implications for BRAF inhibitor therapy |
title_sort | significance of braf v600e mutation status discordance between primary cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases: the implications for braf inhibitor therapy |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hannanendaj thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT olearydonalp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT macnallystephenp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT kayelainew thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT farrellmichaela thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT morrispatrickg thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT powercolmp thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT hillarnolddk thesignificanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT hannanendaj significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT olearydonalp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT macnallystephenp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT kayelainew significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT farrellmichaela significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT morrispatrickg significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT powercolmp significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy AT hillarnolddk significanceofbrafv600emutationstatusdiscordancebetweenprimarycutaneousmelanomaandbrainmetastasestheimplicationsforbrafinhibitortherapy |