Cargando…

Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may reduce the number of adverse events and improve patient outcomes compared with intravenous (IV) sedation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of volatile and IV sedation in adult ICU patients. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ha Yeon, Lee, Ja Eun, Kim, Ha Yan, Kim, Jeongmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29245269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008976
_version_ 1783286100299612160
author Kim, Ha Yeon
Lee, Ja Eun
Kim, Ha Yan
Kim, Jeongmin
author_facet Kim, Ha Yeon
Lee, Ja Eun
Kim, Ha Yan
Kim, Jeongmin
author_sort Kim, Ha Yeon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may reduce the number of adverse events and improve patient outcomes compared with intravenous (IV) sedation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of volatile and IV sedation in adult ICU patients. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science databases for all randomized trials comparing volatile sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device (ACD) with IV sedation in terms of awakening and extubation times, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and pharmacologic end-organ effects. RESULTS: Thirteen trials with a total of 1027 patients were included. Volatile sedation (sevoflurane or isoflurane) administered through an ACD shortened the awakening time [mean difference (MD), −80.0 minutes; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), −134.5 to −25.6; P = .004] and extubation time (MD, −196.0 minutes; 95% CIs, −305.2 to −86.8; P < .001) compared with IV sedation (midazolam or propofol). No differences in the lengths of ICU and hospital stay were noted between the 2 groups. In the analysis of cardiac effects of sedation from 5 studies, patients who received volatile sedation showed lower serum troponin levels 6 hours after ICU admission than patients who received IV sedation (P < .05). The effect size of troponin was largest between 12 and 24 hours after ICU admission (MD, −0.27 μg/L; 95% CIs, −0.44 to −0.09; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Compared with IV sedation, volatile sedation administered through an ACD in the ICU shortened the awakening and extubation times. Considering the difference in serum troponin levels between both arms, volatile anesthetics might have a myocardial protective effect after cardiac surgery even at a subanesthetic dose. Because the included studies used small sample sizes with high heterogeneity, further large, high-quality prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5728884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57288842017-12-20 Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis Kim, Ha Yeon Lee, Ja Eun Kim, Ha Yan Kim, Jeongmin Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may reduce the number of adverse events and improve patient outcomes compared with intravenous (IV) sedation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of volatile and IV sedation in adult ICU patients. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science databases for all randomized trials comparing volatile sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device (ACD) with IV sedation in terms of awakening and extubation times, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and pharmacologic end-organ effects. RESULTS: Thirteen trials with a total of 1027 patients were included. Volatile sedation (sevoflurane or isoflurane) administered through an ACD shortened the awakening time [mean difference (MD), −80.0 minutes; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), −134.5 to −25.6; P = .004] and extubation time (MD, −196.0 minutes; 95% CIs, −305.2 to −86.8; P < .001) compared with IV sedation (midazolam or propofol). No differences in the lengths of ICU and hospital stay were noted between the 2 groups. In the analysis of cardiac effects of sedation from 5 studies, patients who received volatile sedation showed lower serum troponin levels 6 hours after ICU admission than patients who received IV sedation (P < .05). The effect size of troponin was largest between 12 and 24 hours after ICU admission (MD, −0.27 μg/L; 95% CIs, −0.44 to −0.09; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Compared with IV sedation, volatile sedation administered through an ACD in the ICU shortened the awakening and extubation times. Considering the difference in serum troponin levels between both arms, volatile anesthetics might have a myocardial protective effect after cardiac surgery even at a subanesthetic dose. Because the included studies used small sample sizes with high heterogeneity, further large, high-quality prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5728884/ /pubmed/29245269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008976 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3900
Kim, Ha Yeon
Lee, Ja Eun
Kim, Ha Yan
Kim, Jeongmin
Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5728884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29245269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008976
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhayeon volatilesedationintheintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leejaeun volatilesedationintheintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimhayan volatilesedationintheintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjeongmin volatilesedationintheintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis