Cargando…

The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Decision delivery interval (DDI) is the time line between a decision to conduct an emergency caesarean section and actual delivery of the baby. Prolong DDI constitute a third phase delay in provision of emergency obstetric care. Intervention designed to minimize DDI are vital, in attempt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirani, Birjna A., Mchome, Bariki L., Mazuguni, Nicholaus S., Mahande, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x
_version_ 1783286128213753856
author Hirani, Birjna A.
Mchome, Bariki L.
Mazuguni, Nicholaus S.
Mahande, Michael J.
author_facet Hirani, Birjna A.
Mchome, Bariki L.
Mazuguni, Nicholaus S.
Mahande, Michael J.
author_sort Hirani, Birjna A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision delivery interval (DDI) is the time line between a decision to conduct an emergency caesarean section and actual delivery of the baby. Prolong DDI constitute a third phase delay in provision of emergency obstetric care. Intervention designed to minimize DDI are vital, in attempt to prevent maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The feasibility and practicability of the recommended DDI in recent studies have been questioned especially in limited resource setting and therefore the objective of our study was to determine the DDI and its associated fetalmaternal outcomes at a tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania. METHODS: This was a retrospectivecross-sectional study of inpatient cases who underwent emergency caesarean section from January to September 2014. Data were collected from birth registry and case files of patients. Data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 22.0. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval for maternal and fetal outcomes associated with DDI were estimated using Logistic regression models. A p-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 598 women who underwent emergency caesarean section were recruited. The median Decision Delivery Interval was 60 min [IQR 40–120]. Only 12% were operated within 30 min from decision time. Shortest DDI was seen in patients with Cephalopelvic Disproportion (CPD) and uterine rupture (40 min and 45.5 min) as compared to other conditions. Cases with impending uterine rupture, cord prolapse, APH and fetal distress showed to have shorter DDI. There was no significant association between DDI and neonatal transfer,1st and 5(th)minute Apgar score, maternal blood loss (OR: 5.79; 95% CI 0.63–1.64) and hospital stay (OR: 1.02; 95% 0.63–1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the recommended DDI by ACOG & AAP of 30 min is not feasible in our setting, time frame of 75 min could be acceptable but clinical judgment is required to assess on the urgency of caesarean section in order to prevent maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57290062017-12-18 The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study Hirani, Birjna A. Mchome, Bariki L. Mazuguni, Nicholaus S. Mahande, Michael J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision delivery interval (DDI) is the time line between a decision to conduct an emergency caesarean section and actual delivery of the baby. Prolong DDI constitute a third phase delay in provision of emergency obstetric care. Intervention designed to minimize DDI are vital, in attempt to prevent maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The feasibility and practicability of the recommended DDI in recent studies have been questioned especially in limited resource setting and therefore the objective of our study was to determine the DDI and its associated fetalmaternal outcomes at a tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania. METHODS: This was a retrospectivecross-sectional study of inpatient cases who underwent emergency caesarean section from January to September 2014. Data were collected from birth registry and case files of patients. Data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 22.0. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval for maternal and fetal outcomes associated with DDI were estimated using Logistic regression models. A p-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 598 women who underwent emergency caesarean section were recruited. The median Decision Delivery Interval was 60 min [IQR 40–120]. Only 12% were operated within 30 min from decision time. Shortest DDI was seen in patients with Cephalopelvic Disproportion (CPD) and uterine rupture (40 min and 45.5 min) as compared to other conditions. Cases with impending uterine rupture, cord prolapse, APH and fetal distress showed to have shorter DDI. There was no significant association between DDI and neonatal transfer,1st and 5(th)minute Apgar score, maternal blood loss (OR: 5.79; 95% CI 0.63–1.64) and hospital stay (OR: 1.02; 95% 0.63–1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the recommended DDI by ACOG & AAP of 30 min is not feasible in our setting, time frame of 75 min could be acceptable but clinical judgment is required to assess on the urgency of caesarean section in order to prevent maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. BioMed Central 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5729006/ /pubmed/29212457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirani, Birjna A.
Mchome, Bariki L.
Mazuguni, Nicholaus S.
Mahande, Michael J.
The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title_full The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title_short The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
title_sort decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern tanzania: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hiranibirjnaa thedecisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mchomebarikil thedecisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mazuguninicholauss thedecisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mahandemichaelj thedecisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT hiranibirjnaa decisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mchomebarikil decisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mazuguninicholauss decisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mahandemichaelj decisiondeliveryintervalinemergencycaesareansectionanditsassociatedmaternalandfetaloutcomesatareferralhospitalinnortherntanzaniaacrosssectionalstudy