Cargando…

Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them

We review several methods for computing kinetic isotope effects in chemical reactions including semiclassical and quantum instanton theory. These methods describe both the quantization of vibrational modes as well as tunneling and are applied to the ⋅H + H(2) and ⋅H + CH(4) reactions. The absolute r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karandashev, Konstantin, Xu, Zhen-Hao, Meuwly, Markus, Vaníček, Jiří, Richardson, Jeremy O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Crystallographic Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4996339
_version_ 1783286132370309120
author Karandashev, Konstantin
Xu, Zhen-Hao
Meuwly, Markus
Vaníček, Jiří
Richardson, Jeremy O.
author_facet Karandashev, Konstantin
Xu, Zhen-Hao
Meuwly, Markus
Vaníček, Jiří
Richardson, Jeremy O.
author_sort Karandashev, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description We review several methods for computing kinetic isotope effects in chemical reactions including semiclassical and quantum instanton theory. These methods describe both the quantization of vibrational modes as well as tunneling and are applied to the ⋅H + H(2) and ⋅H + CH(4) reactions. The absolute rate constants computed with the semiclassical instanton method both using on-the-fly electronic structure calculations and fitted potential-energy surfaces are also compared directly with exact quantum dynamics results. The error inherent in the instanton approximation is found to be relatively small and similar in magnitude to that introduced by using fitted surfaces. The kinetic isotope effect computed by the quantum instanton is even more accurate, and although it is computationally more expensive, the efficiency can be improved by path-integral acceleration techniques. We also test a simple approach for designing potential-energy surfaces for the example of proton transfer in malonaldehyde. The tunneling splittings are computed, and although they are found to deviate from experimental results, the ratio of the splitting to that of an isotopically substituted form is in much better agreement. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the potential-energy surface and based on our findings suggest ways in which it can be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Crystallographic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57290362017-12-27 Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them Karandashev, Konstantin Xu, Zhen-Hao Meuwly, Markus Vaníček, Jiří Richardson, Jeremy O. Struct Dyn Swiss National Center of Competence in Research: Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology We review several methods for computing kinetic isotope effects in chemical reactions including semiclassical and quantum instanton theory. These methods describe both the quantization of vibrational modes as well as tunneling and are applied to the ⋅H + H(2) and ⋅H + CH(4) reactions. The absolute rate constants computed with the semiclassical instanton method both using on-the-fly electronic structure calculations and fitted potential-energy surfaces are also compared directly with exact quantum dynamics results. The error inherent in the instanton approximation is found to be relatively small and similar in magnitude to that introduced by using fitted surfaces. The kinetic isotope effect computed by the quantum instanton is even more accurate, and although it is computationally more expensive, the efficiency can be improved by path-integral acceleration techniques. We also test a simple approach for designing potential-energy surfaces for the example of proton transfer in malonaldehyde. The tunneling splittings are computed, and although they are found to deviate from experimental results, the ratio of the splitting to that of an isotopically substituted form is in much better agreement. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the potential-energy surface and based on our findings suggest ways in which it can be improved. American Crystallographic Association 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5729036/ /pubmed/29282447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4996339 Text en © 2017 Author(s). 2329-7778/2017/4(6)/061501/19 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Swiss National Center of Competence in Research: Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology
Karandashev, Konstantin
Xu, Zhen-Hao
Meuwly, Markus
Vaníček, Jiří
Richardson, Jeremy O.
Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title_full Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title_fullStr Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title_full_unstemmed Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title_short Kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
title_sort kinetic isotope effects and how to describe them
topic Swiss National Center of Competence in Research: Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4996339
work_keys_str_mv AT karandashevkonstantin kineticisotopeeffectsandhowtodescribethem
AT xuzhenhao kineticisotopeeffectsandhowtodescribethem
AT meuwlymarkus kineticisotopeeffectsandhowtodescribethem
AT vanicekjiri kineticisotopeeffectsandhowtodescribethem
AT richardsonjeremyo kineticisotopeeffectsandhowtodescribethem