Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency in patients admitted to the hospital. Currently, there is a lack of large-scale evidence on the use of high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) in patients with ARF. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we...
Autores principales: | Zhu, Youfeng, Yin, Haiyan, Zhang, Rui, Wei, Jianrui |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0525-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Zhu, Youfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Children with Respiratory Distress
por: Sitthikarnkha, Punthila, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation
por: Luo, Meng-Si, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Le Pape, Sylvain, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation versus in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure
por: Coudroy, R, et al.
Publicado: (2015)