Cargando…
Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157 |
_version_ | 1783286174326980608 |
---|---|
author | Wilkinson, L L Rowe, A C Sheldon, C Johnson, A Brunstrom, J M |
author_facet | Wilkinson, L L Rowe, A C Sheldon, C Johnson, A Brunstrom, J M |
author_sort | Wilkinson, L L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N=34) and bariatric surgery recipients (BSR; N=15) would show higher levels of attachment insecurity (higher attachment anxiety and/or higher attachment avoidance) than a group of age and gender-matched lean controls (N=54). Mediation analyses showed that compared to lean controls (M=2.96, SE=0.1), both BSC (M=3.5, SE=0.2) and BSR (M=3.4, SE=0.2) groups had a more insecure attachment orientation. These relationships were significantly mediated by disinhibited eating (BSC: lower limit confidence interval (LLCI)=0.06 and upper limit confidence interval (ULCI)=0.62; BSR: LLCI=0.02 and ULCI=0.76). There was no such relationship when the BSC and BSR groups were compared (LLCI=−0.15 & ULCI=0.3). These observations suggest that attachment insecurity may be a risk factor for obesity and bariatric surgery because of associated disinhibited eating. Moreover, these factors may be important to consider when bariatric surgery results in poor outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5729341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57293412017-12-15 Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls Wilkinson, L L Rowe, A C Sheldon, C Johnson, A Brunstrom, J M Int J Obes (Lond) Short Communication Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N=34) and bariatric surgery recipients (BSR; N=15) would show higher levels of attachment insecurity (higher attachment anxiety and/or higher attachment avoidance) than a group of age and gender-matched lean controls (N=54). Mediation analyses showed that compared to lean controls (M=2.96, SE=0.1), both BSC (M=3.5, SE=0.2) and BSR (M=3.4, SE=0.2) groups had a more insecure attachment orientation. These relationships were significantly mediated by disinhibited eating (BSC: lower limit confidence interval (LLCI)=0.06 and upper limit confidence interval (ULCI)=0.62; BSR: LLCI=0.02 and ULCI=0.76). There was no such relationship when the BSC and BSR groups were compared (LLCI=−0.15 & ULCI=0.3). These observations suggest that attachment insecurity may be a risk factor for obesity and bariatric surgery because of associated disinhibited eating. Moreover, these factors may be important to consider when bariatric surgery results in poor outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2017-12 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5729341/ /pubmed/28676679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Wilkinson, L L Rowe, A C Sheldon, C Johnson, A Brunstrom, J M Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title | Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title_full | Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title_fullStr | Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title_full_unstemmed | Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title_short | Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
title_sort | disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilkinsonll disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols AT roweac disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols AT sheldonc disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols AT johnsona disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols AT brunstromjm disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols |