Cargando…

Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls

Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, L L, Rowe, A C, Sheldon, C, Johnson, A, Brunstrom, J M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157
_version_ 1783286174326980608
author Wilkinson, L L
Rowe, A C
Sheldon, C
Johnson, A
Brunstrom, J M
author_facet Wilkinson, L L
Rowe, A C
Sheldon, C
Johnson, A
Brunstrom, J M
author_sort Wilkinson, L L
collection PubMed
description Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N=34) and bariatric surgery recipients (BSR; N=15) would show higher levels of attachment insecurity (higher attachment anxiety and/or higher attachment avoidance) than a group of age and gender-matched lean controls (N=54). Mediation analyses showed that compared to lean controls (M=2.96, SE=0.1), both BSC (M=3.5, SE=0.2) and BSR (M=3.4, SE=0.2) groups had a more insecure attachment orientation. These relationships were significantly mediated by disinhibited eating (BSC: lower limit confidence interval (LLCI)=0.06 and upper limit confidence interval (ULCI)=0.62; BSR: LLCI=0.02 and ULCI=0.76). There was no such relationship when the BSC and BSR groups were compared (LLCI=−0.15 & ULCI=0.3). These observations suggest that attachment insecurity may be a risk factor for obesity and bariatric surgery because of associated disinhibited eating. Moreover, these factors may be important to consider when bariatric surgery results in poor outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57293412017-12-15 Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls Wilkinson, L L Rowe, A C Sheldon, C Johnson, A Brunstrom, J M Int J Obes (Lond) Short Communication Previous research has shown that attachment anxiety is a good predictor of body mass index. This relationship is significantly mediated by disinhibited (over-) eating and is likely to reflect a specific form of affect regulation. This study explored whether obese bariatric surgery candidates (BSC; N=34) and bariatric surgery recipients (BSR; N=15) would show higher levels of attachment insecurity (higher attachment anxiety and/or higher attachment avoidance) than a group of age and gender-matched lean controls (N=54). Mediation analyses showed that compared to lean controls (M=2.96, SE=0.1), both BSC (M=3.5, SE=0.2) and BSR (M=3.4, SE=0.2) groups had a more insecure attachment orientation. These relationships were significantly mediated by disinhibited eating (BSC: lower limit confidence interval (LLCI)=0.06 and upper limit confidence interval (ULCI)=0.62; BSR: LLCI=0.02 and ULCI=0.76). There was no such relationship when the BSC and BSR groups were compared (LLCI=−0.15 & ULCI=0.3). These observations suggest that attachment insecurity may be a risk factor for obesity and bariatric surgery because of associated disinhibited eating. Moreover, these factors may be important to consider when bariatric surgery results in poor outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2017-12 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5729341/ /pubmed/28676679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Short Communication
Wilkinson, L L
Rowe, A C
Sheldon, C
Johnson, A
Brunstrom, J M
Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title_full Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title_fullStr Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title_full_unstemmed Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title_short Disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
title_sort disinhibited eating mediates differences in attachment insecurity between bariatric surgery candidates/recipients and lean controls
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.157
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonll disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols
AT roweac disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols
AT sheldonc disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols
AT johnsona disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols
AT brunstromjm disinhibitedeatingmediatesdifferencesinattachmentinsecuritybetweenbariatricsurgerycandidatesrecipientsandleancontrols