Cargando…

Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample

OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent results have been found in prior studies investigating the accuracy of self‐reported waist circumference, and no study has investigated the validity of self‐reported waist circumference among Japanese individuals. This study used the diagnostic standard of metabolic syndrome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okamoto, N., Hosono, A., Shibata, K., Tsujimura, S., Oka, K., Fujita, H., Kamiya, M., Kondo, F., Wakabayashi, R., Yamada, T., Suzuki, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.122
_version_ 1783286210800648192
author Okamoto, N.
Hosono, A.
Shibata, K.
Tsujimura, S.
Oka, K.
Fujita, H.
Kamiya, M.
Kondo, F.
Wakabayashi, R.
Yamada, T.
Suzuki, S.
author_facet Okamoto, N.
Hosono, A.
Shibata, K.
Tsujimura, S.
Oka, K.
Fujita, H.
Kamiya, M.
Kondo, F.
Wakabayashi, R.
Yamada, T.
Suzuki, S.
author_sort Okamoto, N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent results have been found in prior studies investigating the accuracy of self‐reported waist circumference, and no study has investigated the validity of self‐reported waist circumference among Japanese individuals. This study used the diagnostic standard of metabolic syndrome to assess the accuracy of individual's self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample. METHODS: Study participants included 7,443 Japanese men and women aged 35–79 years. They participated in a cohort study's baseline survey between 2007 and 2011. Participants' height, weight and waist circumference were measured, and their body mass index was calculated. Self‐reported values were collected through a questionnaire before the examination. RESULTS: Strong correlations between measured and self‐reported values for height, weight and body mass index were detected. The correlation was lowest for waist circumference (men, 0.87; women, 0.73). Men significantly overestimated their waist circumference (mean difference, 0.8 cm), whereas women significantly underestimated theirs (mean difference, 5.1 cm). The sensitivity of self‐reported waist circumference using the cut‐off value of metabolic syndrome was 0.83 for men and 0.57 for women. CONCLUSIONS: Due to systematic and random errors, the accuracy of self‐reported waist circumference was low. Therefore, waist circumference should be measured without relying on self‐reported values, particularly in the case of women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57295012017-12-19 Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample Okamoto, N. Hosono, A. Shibata, K. Tsujimura, S. Oka, K. Fujita, H. Kamiya, M. Kondo, F. Wakabayashi, R. Yamada, T. Suzuki, S. Obes Sci Pract Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent results have been found in prior studies investigating the accuracy of self‐reported waist circumference, and no study has investigated the validity of self‐reported waist circumference among Japanese individuals. This study used the diagnostic standard of metabolic syndrome to assess the accuracy of individual's self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample. METHODS: Study participants included 7,443 Japanese men and women aged 35–79 years. They participated in a cohort study's baseline survey between 2007 and 2011. Participants' height, weight and waist circumference were measured, and their body mass index was calculated. Self‐reported values were collected through a questionnaire before the examination. RESULTS: Strong correlations between measured and self‐reported values for height, weight and body mass index were detected. The correlation was lowest for waist circumference (men, 0.87; women, 0.73). Men significantly overestimated their waist circumference (mean difference, 0.8 cm), whereas women significantly underestimated theirs (mean difference, 5.1 cm). The sensitivity of self‐reported waist circumference using the cut‐off value of metabolic syndrome was 0.83 for men and 0.57 for women. CONCLUSIONS: Due to systematic and random errors, the accuracy of self‐reported waist circumference was low. Therefore, waist circumference should be measured without relying on self‐reported values, particularly in the case of women. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5729501/ /pubmed/29259800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.122 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Okamoto, N.
Hosono, A.
Shibata, K.
Tsujimura, S.
Oka, K.
Fujita, H.
Kamiya, M.
Kondo, F.
Wakabayashi, R.
Yamada, T.
Suzuki, S.
Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title_full Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title_fullStr Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title_short Accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a Japanese sample
title_sort accuracy of self‐reported height, weight and waist circumference in a japanese sample
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.122
work_keys_str_mv AT okamoton accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT hosonoa accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT shibatak accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT tsujimuras accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT okak accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT fujitah accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT kamiyam accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT kondof accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT wakabayashir accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT yamadat accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample
AT suzukis accuracyofselfreportedheightweightandwaistcircumferenceinajapanesesample