Cargando…

Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding disparities in cardiovascular risk factor management between patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVE: Whether the goal achievement rates of cardiovascular risk factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Xia-qing, LI, Yanfang, Jiang, Zhi-li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267627
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170153
_version_ 1783286250002710528
author Gao, Xia-qing
LI, Yanfang
Jiang, Zhi-li
author_facet Gao, Xia-qing
LI, Yanfang
Jiang, Zhi-li
author_sort Gao, Xia-qing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding disparities in cardiovascular risk factor management between patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVE: Whether the goal achievement rates of cardiovascular risk factors were different between PCI and CABG patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data retrieved from a clinical record database of patients admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who underwent PCI or CABG. RESULTS: Compared with the CABG group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 1.8 mmol/L (28.6% vs. 24.7%; p < 0.01), LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (43.5% vs. 39.4%; p < 0.01) and blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg (85.6% vs. 77.7%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates were significantly higher in the PCI group. Compared with patients ≥ 60 years old: patients < 60 years old had better BP < 140/90 mm Hg goal achievement rates (87.7% vs. 84.4%; p < 0.01) in the PCI group, and better fasting blood-glucose (FBG) < 7 mmol/L (79.4% vs.72.0%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (79.4% vs. 70.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the CABG group. Compared with females: males had better LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (24.7% vs. 28.5%; p < 0.01), FBG < 7 mmol/L (71.8% vs.75.2%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (70.4% vs. 74.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the PCI group. CONCLUSION: Patients in the PCI group were generally more likely than those in the CABG group to achieve LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and BP goals. The control of cardiovascular risk factors differed between patients ≥ 60 years old and < 60 years old. Female patients were less likely to achieve LDL-C, FBG and HbA1c goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57297832017-12-18 Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients Gao, Xia-qing LI, Yanfang Jiang, Zhi-li Arq Bras Cardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding disparities in cardiovascular risk factor management between patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVE: Whether the goal achievement rates of cardiovascular risk factors were different between PCI and CABG patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data retrieved from a clinical record database of patients admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who underwent PCI or CABG. RESULTS: Compared with the CABG group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 1.8 mmol/L (28.6% vs. 24.7%; p < 0.01), LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (43.5% vs. 39.4%; p < 0.01) and blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg (85.6% vs. 77.7%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates were significantly higher in the PCI group. Compared with patients ≥ 60 years old: patients < 60 years old had better BP < 140/90 mm Hg goal achievement rates (87.7% vs. 84.4%; p < 0.01) in the PCI group, and better fasting blood-glucose (FBG) < 7 mmol/L (79.4% vs.72.0%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (79.4% vs. 70.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the CABG group. Compared with females: males had better LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (24.7% vs. 28.5%; p < 0.01), FBG < 7 mmol/L (71.8% vs.75.2%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (70.4% vs. 74.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the PCI group. CONCLUSION: Patients in the PCI group were generally more likely than those in the CABG group to achieve LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and BP goals. The control of cardiovascular risk factors differed between patients ≥ 60 years old and < 60 years old. Female patients were less likely to achieve LDL-C, FBG and HbA1c goals. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5729783/ /pubmed/29267627 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170153 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gao, Xia-qing
LI, Yanfang
Jiang, Zhi-li
Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title_full Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title_short Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients
title_sort comparison of secondary prevention status between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267627
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170153
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoxiaqing comparisonofsecondarypreventionstatusbetweenpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypasspatients
AT liyanfang comparisonofsecondarypreventionstatusbetweenpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypasspatients
AT jiangzhili comparisonofsecondarypreventionstatusbetweenpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypasspatients